Evaluating Dimension accuracy of three differently fabricated denture base materials | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 20, Volume 65, Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), July 2019, Page 2635-2640 PDF (855.42 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2019.72626 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ahmed Mohamed El-Sayed1; Amr Salah El Din2; Inass Abdel Rahman AbuElmagd3 | ||||
1Associate Professor of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. | ||||
2Lecturer of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University. | ||||
3Associate Professor of of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Fayoum University. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: to compare the accuracy of three different denture base materials used in maxillary edentulous arch Materials and Methods: ten patients were selected, with completely edentulous arches, for each patient three finial PMMA denture bases were done using different construction technique pack and press, computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing CAD/CAM milled and selective laser sintering (SLS) PMMA denture base All denture bases in this study were submitted for CBCT scanning for dimension accuracy and volume linear evaluation. Results: The mean and standard deviation values were calculated for each group in each test. Data were explored for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests, data showed parametric (normal) distribution. A statistically significant difference was found between (Heat cure acrylic denture), (CAD/CAM denture) and (Laser sintering denture) Conclusion: also press and pack technique is more time consuming regarding number of visits but less dimensional changes than CAD/CAM and (SLS) selective laser sintering. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
denture base; dimension accuracy; CAD/CAM; SLS& dimension accuracy | ||||
Statistics Article View: 204 PDF Download: 277 |
||||