Effect of Thermo-mechanical Aging on the Surface Roughness and Micro-hardness of Four CAD/CAM Materials | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 65, Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), April 2019, Page 1451-1461 PDF (2.27 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2019.72884 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Rania A Amin1; Dalia A Saba2; Mostafa A Abdellatif3 | ||||
| 1Assistant Professor in Crowns and Bridges Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University (Girls’ branch), Egypt | ||||
| 2Associate Professor of Dental Materials Science, Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Associate Professor of Dental Materials Science, Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt, FUE. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in surface roughness and micro-hardness of four CAD/CAM materials after thermo-mechanical aging. Materials and methods: Four commercially available CAD/CAM materials were investigated in this study; two ceramic materials; CEREC Blocs, Celtra Duo, and two hybrid ceramics; CERASMART and VITA ENAMIC. The materials’ blocks were cut into 5 disks each and were subjected to thermo-mechanical aging through 250,000 thermocycles in a mechanical chewing simulator. Surface roughness and micro-hardness were evaluated for each material pre and post thermo-mechanical aging using digital image processing technology and Vickers hardness testing machine, respectively. Results were statistically analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bonferroni Post Hoc test and paired t test (P≤0.05). Results: Regarding surface roughness; there was no significant difference between all investigated materials before thermo-mechanical aging. After aging, all materials showed insignificant difference between them and insignificant change between pre and post aging with exception of CERASMART that showed significant increase in surface roughness. Regarding surface micro-hardness, the tested materials showed significant difference pre aging in the ascending order of Cerasmart < Enamic < Cerec Blocks < Celtra Duo. But after aging, all materials showed insignificant difference in surface micro-hardness between them and insignificant change between before and after the test. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the current study, it can be concluded that although within the clinical acceptable range, the surface roughness of Cerasmart was significantly affected by the thermo-mechanical aging. The composition is still the most important parameter affecting the surface roughness and micro-hardness of CAD/CAM ceramic and hybrid ceramic materials | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| CEREC; Celtra Duo; CERASMART; Vita Enamic; aging; Chewing simulation | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 222 PDF Download: 361 |
||||
