EFFECT OF BONE REGENERATION WITH PLATELETS RICH FIBRIN VERSUS MINERALIZED PLASMATIC MATRIX FOR IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 63, Issue 4 - October (Oral Surgery), October 2017, Page 3057-3067 PDF (2.1 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2017.76098 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Nader Nabil Elbokle1; Omnia Ibrahim Sultan2; Ingy Mohamed Chehata2; Ahmed Mohamed Hossam3 | ||||
| 1Assistant professor of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Faculty of Oral and Dental medicine, Cairo University, Egypt | ||||
| 2Lecturer of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. October University of Modern Sciences and Art. Egypt | ||||
| 3Lecturer of Radiology. October University of Modern Sciences and Art.Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objectives: This study was conducted to assess and compare the effect of platelets rich fibrin (PRF) versus mineralized plasmatic matrix (MPM) as bone regenerative materials during immediate implant placement. Material and Methods: A total of 10 patients with 12 implants have been included in this study, patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I received Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM), and group II received Platelets Rich Fibrin (PRF) as bone regenerative materials for immediate implant placement. The treatment outcome was evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3 and 6 months of implant placement. Also bone height and bone density were measured radiographically preoperatively, immediate post operatively, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and statistically analysed. Results: Statistical analysis showed that bone density increased significantly (p≤0.05) at 3, and 6 months postoperatively in both groups. By comparing the two groups, Group I had statistically significant (p≤0.05) higher bone density scores than Group II at all of the follow up intervals. Regarding the bone height, there was no statistically significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) between the two groups at all of the follow up intervals except that group I showed a statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05) higher mesial bone height level at 3and 6 months postoperatively accompanied by a statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05) higher distal bone level as well at 6 months postoperatively than that of group II. Conclusion: The use of MPM was more superior to PRF as bone regenerative material for immediate implant placement regarding bone height and bone density. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Immediate implant; PRF; MPM; bone regeneration; osteointegration; growth factors; and platelet concentrates | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 145 PDF Download: 251 |
||||
