APICAL CLEANLINESS AFTER REMOVAL OF TOTALFILL BIOCERAMIC SEALER VERSUS AH-PLUS EPOXY-RESIN SEALER | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 15, Volume 63, Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), October 2017, Page 3463-3472 PDF (2.58 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2017.76265 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Mohammed Hamdi Atteia | ||||
| Associate Professor of Endodontics, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the apical cleanliness following canal enlargement after removal of canal obturating material containing TotalFill bioceramic Sealer as compared to AH-Plus epoxy-resin sealer. Materials & Methods: 40 obturated single-canal roots were divided into 2 groups; AH-Plus (Gp-I) and TotalFill (Gp-II) 15 specimen each. 5 specimens were kept as control for each group. Canal filling was removed and canals were enlarged. According to the file size used for canal enlargement, each group was divided into 3 sub-groups; A, B, and C (#30-0.04%, #35-0.04, and #35-0.04%, respectively). Roots were split and the apical third was examined under SEM. Digital image analysis was done for the photomicrographs. Results: SEM images of the control groups revealed more condensed and widely spread particles of TotalFill in comparison to AH-Plus. In AH-Plus subgroups: The recorded means (in a descending order) of remnants for subgroups I_A, I_B, and I_C were 27.3, 24.23, and 0.94, respectively. There was a significant statistical difference (P≤0.05) between the test subgroups, except for subgroups I_A/I_B where the difference was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05). In TotalFill subgroups: The recorded means (in a descending order) of remnants for subgroups II_A, II_B, and II_C were 48.16, 39.3, and 30.42, respectively. There was a statistically insignificant difference (P > 0.05) between the test subgroups, except for subgroups II_A/II_C, where the difference was statistically significant (P≤0.05). In file #40 sub-groups: There was a statistically significant difference (P≤0.01) between the recorded amount of remnants between AH-Plus and TotalFill subgroups. TotalFill recorded higher amount of remnants. Conclusions: Within the parameters of this study - after canal desobturation -, increasing the size of the apical preparation – within limits – improves the cleanliness of canal walls at the apical third area. TotalFill sealer leaves more remnants on the dentin surface of the apical third when compared to AH-Plus sealer. It’s better to enlarge the apical third of the canal two or three sizes larger than the master apical file (in case of desobturation of bioceramic-sealer-containing canal filling) to ensure better cleanliness of the area. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Apical preparation; apical cleaning; bioceramic sealer; epoxy resin sealer; TotalFill; AH-plus; retreatment | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 111 PDF Download: 215 |
||||
