Socket- shield technique versus guided bone regeneration technique for ridge preservation with immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 64, Issue 3 - July (Oral Surgery), July 2018, Page 2047-2055 PDF (1.11 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2018.76748 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Hesham Fattouh | ||||
| Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objectives: To evaluate the socket shield technique and compare the survival, stability, esthetic outcome and complication rates of immediate implants in the esthetic zone placed using this technique with the traditional guided bone regeneration technique. Patients and Methods: 20 Patients were enrolled in this study, they were randomized into two equal groups, after receiving a post extraction implant in the esthetic zone; Group I patients were managed with guided bone regeneration technique, while group II patients were treated with socket shied technique. Functional and esthetic outcomes of the treatment in term of implant survival and marginal bone level were evaluated. Results: Implant survival rate after 1 year was 100% in both groups. Implants inserted with the socket shield technique demonstrated better values of marginal bone level and were statistically significant. Conclusions: Socket shield technique is a highly promising addition to dental implantlogy that seems to be a feasible surgical option characterized by better esthetic outcomes when compared to guided bone regeneration technique. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Immediate implant- esthetic zone; socket shield; guided bone regeneration; alveolar bone preservation | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 405 PDF Download: 688 |
||||
