COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY) | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 6, Volume 66, Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery), January 2020, Page 113-122 PDF (1.3 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.77522 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Omar N. El-Prince1; Hala R. Ragab2 | ||||
1Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, MUST University, Egypt. | ||||
2Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: The current study assessed the success of infiltration anesthesia versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) anesthesia during (mobile and non-vital) teeth extraction in posterior mandible. Materials and methods: In a prospective study, 120 patients were included to extract one tooth for each patient in the posterior mandible under local anesthesia either by local infiltration = 60 (18 males, 42 females); or IANB = 60 (32 males, 28 females). Comparing anesthetic success rate of the two techniques and time until onset of anesthetic action (min). Results: IANB was successful in 100% of the patients, where infiltration anesthesia succeeded in 85%. In addition, duration until onset of action was found to be equal with p =(0.7) Conclusion: Infiltration technique offers a simpler substitute with less complication compared to IANB in establishing effective anesthesia for mandibular mobile and non-vital posterior teeth during intra-alveolar dental extractions. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
IANB; infiltration; Extraction; Lidocaine; mandibular molars | ||||
Statistics Article View: 218 PDF Download: 367 |
||||