TWO YEARS CLINICAL EVALUATION OF A BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPARED WITH A NANOHYBRIDE INCREMENTAL FILL COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS ΙΙ CAVITIES
Attia, R. (2018). TWO YEARS CLINICAL EVALUATION OF A BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPARED WITH A NANOHYBRIDE INCREMENTAL FILL COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS ΙΙ CAVITIES. EKB Journal Management System, 64(Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)), 1547-1559. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78098
Reham M. Attia. "TWO YEARS CLINICAL EVALUATION OF A BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPARED WITH A NANOHYBRIDE INCREMENTAL FILL COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS ΙΙ CAVITIES". EKB Journal Management System, 64, Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), 2018, 1547-1559. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78098
Attia, R. (2018). 'TWO YEARS CLINICAL EVALUATION OF A BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPARED WITH A NANOHYBRIDE INCREMENTAL FILL COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS ΙΙ CAVITIES', EKB Journal Management System, 64(Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)), pp. 1547-1559. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78098
Attia, R. TWO YEARS CLINICAL EVALUATION OF A BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPARED WITH A NANOHYBRIDE INCREMENTAL FILL COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS ΙΙ CAVITIES. EKB Journal Management System, 2018; 64(Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)): 1547-1559. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78098

TWO YEARS CLINICAL EVALUATION OF A BULK FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPARED WITH A NANOHYBRIDE INCREMENTAL FILL COMPOSITE RESIN IN CLASS ΙΙ CAVITIES

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 18, Volume 64, Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), April 2018, Page 1547-1559  XML PDF (389.57 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2018.78098
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Reham M. Attia
Lecturer of Operative Dentistry, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Zagazig University
Abstract
Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the two years clinical performance of a bulk fill composite and conventional nanohybride incremental fill composite in class II cavities.
Materials and methods: A total of 60 class Π cavities were restored with either bulk fill material (Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill) and self-etch adhesive (AdheSE adhesive) or an incremental resin composite (Tetric N-Ceram Nano-hybrid) and self-etch adhesive (AdheSE adhesive). In group Ι: The restorative material Tetric EvoCeram Bulk-Fill was applied in one bulk. In group Π: Tetric N-Ceram Nano-hybrid was applied using an incremental filling technique starting at the gingival wall. All restorations were clinically evaluated at periods of 1 week (initial recall), after six months, after one year, after eighteen months and at the end of two years. Assessment was done according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using Friedman test and Fisher’s exact at P<0.05 level of significance.
Results: There was no significant difference between group Ι and group Π regarding all tested criteria at different follow up periods; where P > 0.05.
Conclusion: Bulk fill composite (Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill) and incremental fill composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram Nano-hybrid) exhibited comparable acceptable clinical performance after two years of evaluation
Keywords
Bulk fill composite; Clinical evaluation; Incremental fill
Statistics
Article View: 275
PDF Download: 776