THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT MODEL TECHNIQUES ON THE MARGINAL GAP OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 39, Volume 64, Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), April 2018, Page 1745-1755 PDF (986.42 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2018.78431 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Maged Zohdy1; Andy Gabra2 | ||||
| 1Associate professor of fixed prosthodontics ain shams university and british university | ||||
| 2Lecturer of fixed prosthodontics ain shams university | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Statement of problem: The conventional model fabrication methods have multiple error-introducing steps such as impression, stone setting, waxing and casting; therefore a more reliable and quality controlled method of model fabrication is required Objective: This research was designed to evaluate the effect of different model fabrication techniques: Conventional stone cast, Rapid Prototyping-3D printing and CAD/CAM on the marginal gap of implant supported fixed partial denture. Materials and methods: An epoxy resin cast simulating a clinical case with missing lower first mandibular molar was fabricated that served as a master cast from which an optical impression was done to fabricate a 3D printed model and a milled model , and another rubber base impression was done to fabricate a conventional cast, upon these three casts, five three units bridge was fabricated on each model, then marginal gap of implant supported fixed partial denture was evaluated using stereomicroscope. Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences were found between the model manufacturing techniques. 3D-printing showed the lowest marginal gap value among all groups | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 118 PDF Download: 402 |
||||
