COMPARISON OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION AND CENTERING ABILITY OF XP SHAPER, WAVEONE AND ONESHAPE: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF CURVED ROOT CANALS
Hassan, R., Roshdy, N., Issa, N. (2018). COMPARISON OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION AND CENTERING ABILITY OF XP SHAPER, WAVEONE AND ONESHAPE: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF CURVED ROOT CANALS. EKB Journal Management System, 64(Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)), 1845-1853. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78443
Reham Hassan; Nehal Roshdy; Noha Issa. "COMPARISON OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION AND CENTERING ABILITY OF XP SHAPER, WAVEONE AND ONESHAPE: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF CURVED ROOT CANALS". EKB Journal Management System, 64, Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), 2018, 1845-1853. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78443
Hassan, R., Roshdy, N., Issa, N. (2018). 'COMPARISON OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION AND CENTERING ABILITY OF XP SHAPER, WAVEONE AND ONESHAPE: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF CURVED ROOT CANALS', EKB Journal Management System, 64(Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)), pp. 1845-1853. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78443
Hassan, R., Roshdy, N., Issa, N. COMPARISON OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION AND CENTERING ABILITY OF XP SHAPER, WAVEONE AND ONESHAPE: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF CURVED ROOT CANALS. EKB Journal Management System, 2018; 64(Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)): 1845-1853. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.78443

COMPARISON OF CANAL TRANSPORTATION AND CENTERING ABILITY OF XP SHAPER, WAVEONE AND ONESHAPE: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY OF CURVED ROOT CANALS

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 49, Volume 64, Issue 2 - April (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), April 2018, Page 1845-1853  XML PDF (391.84 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2018.78443
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Reham Hassan1; Nehal Roshdy2; Noha Issaorcid 3
1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University
2Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
3Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Abstract
This study investigated the shaping abilities of XP Shaper and compared it with other single file NiTi systems using full rotation and reciprocation motion by cone beam computed tomography. Mesiobuccal canal of forty-five mandibular first molars, were divided into three equal groups, using WaveOne, OneShape and XP shaper. Pre-and post instrumentation images were obtained at 3mm, 5mm and 7mm from the apex and were assessed to determine canal transportation and centering ability. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing the three systems, while Friedman’s test was used to compare between the root levels. WaveOne and OneShape showed the highest mean amount of transportation with no statistically significant difference between them. XP Shaper showed the lowest statistically significantly mean amount of transportation. There was a statistically significant difference in the canal centring ability among the three instruments used. It was concluded that XP shaper preserved the original canal shape better than WaveOne and OneShape.
Keywords
Canal transportation; Centering ability; Cone beam computed tomography; OneShape; WaveOne; XP Shaper
Statistics
Article View: 480
PDF Download: 602