ADAPTATION OF RESIN COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL SURFACE PREPARED BY DIFFERENT CUTTING TOOLS - SEM STUDY ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 16, Volume 64, Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), July 2018, Page 2545-2550 PDF (674.51 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2018.78468 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Majed Amin Ashi1; Yasser El-Bouhi2 | ||||
1Dental Intern, Faculty of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia | ||||
2Consultant, Alexandria Dental Research Center, Semouha, Alexandria, Egypt - Assistant professor, Department of Conservative and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Aim: To investigate the effect of four different cutting tools on the adaptation of resin composite to enamel. Materials and methods: Twenty extracted sound human premolar teeth were used. Occlusal surfaces were ground flat and four random groups were formed according to the received surface treatment as follow, 600-grit silicon-carbide paper (control), carbide-bur, diamond-stone and air abrasion. Two successive layers of self-etch bonding agent were applied followed by composite build-up. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally, the interface between composite and enamel was examined by SEM and micrographs were obtained. Results: the best adaptation and least surface roughness were seen in the control group while the roughest surface was observed in the air abrasion group with presence of scanty microgaps. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
adaptation; Composite; cutting tools; enamel | ||||
Statistics Article View: 180 PDF Download: 214 |
||||