COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BIOACTIVE DENTIN SUBSTITUTE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN
Barakat, O., Samman, M. (2018). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BIOACTIVE DENTIN SUBSTITUTE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN. EKB Journal Management System, 64(Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)), 4049-4056. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.79522
Ola Barakat; Muhammad A Samman. "COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BIOACTIVE DENTIN SUBSTITUTE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN". EKB Journal Management System, 64, Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), 2018, 4049-4056. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.79522
Barakat, O., Samman, M. (2018). 'COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BIOACTIVE DENTIN SUBSTITUTE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN', EKB Journal Management System, 64(Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)), pp. 4049-4056. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.79522
Barakat, O., Samman, M. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BIOACTIVE DENTIN SUBSTITUTE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN. EKB Journal Management System, 2018; 64(Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics)): 4049-4056. doi: 10.21608/edj.2018.79522

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BIOACTIVE DENTIN SUBSTITUTE AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 55, Volume 64, Issue 4 - October (Fixed Prosthodontics, Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics), October 2018, Page 4049-4056  XML PDF (728.37 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2018.79522
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ola Barakat1; Muhammad A Samman2
1Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Oral and Dental Surgery, Misr University For Science and Technology. Egypt
2Associate Professor Dental Biomaterials Department , Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al Azher University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: In clinical practice, the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions is a challenge, because most of the time the cervical margin is located in cementum or dentin. This characteristic makes the cervical margin more susceptible to microleakage, causing marginal stains, postoperative sensitivity and recurrent caries.
Aim: To compare the microleakage and bond strength for teeth restored with Activa Bioactive restorative and nanohybrid composite resin
Materials and methods: Twenty permanent premolars were selected with class V cavities for microleakage, and 20 permanent premolars were selected for shear bond strength. Microleakage was checked using dye penetration method under digital microscope Universal testing device was used to assess the shear bond strength. Leakage scores, mean and standard deviation values for shear bond strength were calculated from the recorded values. For numerical data student t-test was performed to detect the significance between both groups. For categorical data analysis Chi square test was done.
Results; There was non-significant difference between ACTIVA bioactive restorative group and nanohybrid composite resin group in both parameters; leakage and bond strength
Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, the type of restorative material did not appear to have a significant influence on microleakage or bond strength
Keywords
Active Bioactive; Non-Curious Cervical Lesions; Microleakage
Statistics
Article View: 200
PDF Download: 482