Phase Transformation, Surface Topography and Mechanical Properties of Hydrothermal Aged Laser treated Cubic Versus Tetragonal Zirconia Ceramics | ||||
Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls | ||||
Article 8, Volume 7, 2-C, April 2020, Page 213-227 PDF (1.58 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2020.14226.1189 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Shahenda A. Abdallah 1; Inas T. Motawea2; Mostafa M. Abdel Ghany3; Rania A. Amin4 | ||||
1Assistant Lecturer of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Egypt. | ||||
2Professor of Dental Biomaterial, and Vice Dean of Post Graduated studies and Researches, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
3Professor of Removable Prosthodontics, and Dean of Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
4Assistant Professor of Crowns and Bridges, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Purpose: This study was carried out to compare the effect of laser surface treatment on cubic and tetragonal zirconia ceramics regarding; phase transformation tetragonal-monoclinic (T-M), surface topography, mechanical properties and biaxial flexural strength before and after low thermal degradation (LTD) aging. Materials and Methods: sixty discs (N=60) of CAD/CAM zirconia were used in this study. These specimens were divided into two main groups according to type of zirconia. Group I: (n=30) Cubic Zirconia (DD cubeX2), while Group II: (n=30) Tetragonal zirconia (Superfect-Zir). Then each group further subdivided into two subgroups according to surface treatment, subgroup (1): control without surface treatment, subgroup (2): laser surface treatment .Specimens form each subgroups were tested for the following; Phase transformation, surface topography, and mechanical properties before and after Low Thermal Degradation (LTD) aging test. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that there was a statistical significant difference between the two tested groups regarding the surface topography, biaxial flexural strength, and surface hardness. Also there was a statistical significant difference regarding the surface treatment and before/after LTD and laser among the tested zirconia ceramics. Conclusions: laser surface treatment improved the properties of tetragonal / cubic zirconia, and increases their resistance to low thermal degradation LTD aging. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Cubic Zirconia; Thermal Degradation; Laser Surface Topography; Biaxial Flexural Strength | ||||
Statistics Article View: 240 PDF Download: 454 |
||||