Trends in Designing the Administrative Workplaces
Hassan, S., El Aidi, D., habib, H. (2020). Trends in Designing the Administrative Workplaces. EKB Journal Management System, 10(1), 209-222. doi: 10.21608/idj.2020.81524
Sumaya Hassan; Doaa El Aidi; Heba habib. "Trends in Designing the Administrative Workplaces". EKB Journal Management System, 10, 1, 2020, 209-222. doi: 10.21608/idj.2020.81524
Hassan, S., El Aidi, D., habib, H. (2020). 'Trends in Designing the Administrative Workplaces', EKB Journal Management System, 10(1), pp. 209-222. doi: 10.21608/idj.2020.81524
Hassan, S., El Aidi, D., habib, H. Trends in Designing the Administrative Workplaces. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 10(1): 209-222. doi: 10.21608/idj.2020.81524

Trends in Designing the Administrative Workplaces

International Design Journal
Article 17, Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2020, Page 209-222  XML PDF (3.11 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/idj.2020.81524
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Sumaya Hassan1; Doaa El Aidi2; Heba habib3
1Prof. of Color theories, Interior Design and Furniture Department, Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University, Egypt.
2Lecturer, Interior Design and Furniture Department, Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University, Egypt.
3Master Student, Interior Design and Furniture Department, Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University, Egypt.
Abstract
As a result of many political, economical and social conditions over the past decades, design of the administrative workplaces have been through many changes and different phases of developments: ups and downs, negatives and positives. The dynamics of technological changes have led to immediate effects on changing the nature of administrative workspaces, which in turn has led to direct changes in designing of the interior of workspaces. Research problem lies, thus, in the lack of clear criteria for designing administrative workplaces, which should support interior designers to keep up with the rapid development in this field. In addition, recognizing the fact that design has a pivotal role to play in the comprehensive economic and sustained growth. In this context, designers will participate positively in pushing the development process and the achievement of the eighth goal of sustainable development Agenda (SDGs): To promote sustained, inclusive and stainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all. Research aims at exploring the changes occurred in designing the administrative workspaces from 1950 to 2000, then followed by an analytical study of contemporary design trends in order to extract clear criteria that support the design process. This means that the research will follow the inductive approach first. This approach relies on the collection of visual facts in a manner that captures the essence of the subject while considering the timeframe, historical context and the cultural dimension to achieve a logical and a scientific interpretation. Afterwards, the deductive approach will be adopted to choose clear criteria for accommodating the ongoing changes and adopting them in the design process in an effective and a constructive manner.  Research results will be presented to show how to overcome the negative points, as well as, how to create diversity in the design of workplaces, which will facilitate communication and smooth interaction between employees. This in turn will achieve the required sustainability.
Keywords
التصميم الداخلي; Interior Design; أهداف التنمية المستدامة; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); التصميم المسئول اجتماعيا; Socially Responsible Design; المسئولية الأجتماعية للشرکات; Corporate Social Responsibility; الرفاهية في بيئة العمل; Workplaces Wellbeing
References
  1. Attaran, M., Attaran, S. & Kirkland, D.  (2019) “The Need for Digital Workplace: Increasing Workforce Productivity in the Information Age” International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, Volume 15,  Issue 1, P. 1
  2. Neufeind, M., O’reilly, J. & Ranft, F.  (2018) “Work In The Digital Age Challenges Of The Fourth Industrial Revolution” Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd,  London, UK, P. 1, 119
  3. Zamenopoulos, T. & Alexiou, K.  (2018) “CO-DESIGN AS COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH” University of Bristol/ AHRC Connected Communities Programme, P. 10,11
  4. Arundell, L., Sudholz, B. & Teychenne, M (2018) “The Impact of Activity BasedWorking (ABW) on Workplace Activity, Eating Behaviours, Productivity, and Satisfaction”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, P. 1,2
  5. Udomiaye, E., Okon, I., Uzodimma, O.& Patrick, N (2018) “ECO-FRIENDLY BUILDINGS: THE ARCHITECT’S PERSPECTIVES”, Department of Architectural technology, International Journal of Civil Engineering, Construction and Estate Management, Vol.6, P. 24, 25
  6. Metayer, S. (2017) “2017 Global Workplace Trends” the Sodexo Institute for Quality of Life, P. 56, 57
  7. Rothe, P. (2017) “The Rise And Rise Of Activity Based Working - Reshaping The Physical, Virtual And Behavioural Workspace” Leesman, Sweden, P. 18
  8. Odeku, O. & Odeku, K. (2015) “Importance Of The Welfare Facilities In The Workplace: Issues In Perspectives” The Scientific Journal for Theory and Practice of Socio-economic Development, P. 23
  9. Browning, B. & Cooper, C. (2015) “The Global Impact of Biophilic Design in the Workplace”, Human Spaces, P. 7
  10. Andrew, P., Ip, J., Worthington, J., Brooke, C. (2014) “Fast Forward 2030 - The Future of Work And The Workplace” Genesis Research Report, P. 2,5,6
  11. Browning,, w.,  Ryan, c., & Clancy, j., (2014) “14 Patterns Of Biophilic Design Improving Health & Well-Being In The Built Environment” Journal of the American Medical Association, P. 12
  12. Yun, R., Scupelli, P. Aziz, A. & Loftness, V (2013) “Sustainability in the Workplace: Nine Intervention Techniques for Behavior Change”, Intelligent Workplace, Carnegie Mellon University, P. 253, 262
  13. Saiful, W. (2006) “Defining corporate social responsibility” Journal of Public Affairs, Volume(6), P. 177
  14. Davey, C.,  Wootton, A., Thomas, A., Cooper, R., & Press, M., (2005) “Design for the Surreal World? A New Model of Socially Responsible Design” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, University of the Arts Bremen, German, P. 3,4
  15. Burkett, I. (2002) “Co-designing for Social Good: The Role of Citizens in Designing and Delivering Social Services” Centre for Social Impact, University of NSW, P.3

المواقع الألکترونیة:

  1. Criterion (2015). Office Design Trends Part 1: : Throughout The Decades. https://www.criterionindustries.com.au/blogs/blog/office-design-trends-throughout-the-decades . Accessed 17 sept. 2017
  2. Morganlovell . The Evolution Of Office Design. https://www.morganlovell.co.uk/articles/the-evolution-of-office-design/ . Accessed 26 oct. 2017
  3. SOM. One Chase Manhattan Plaza. http://www.som.com/projects/one_chase_manhattan_plaza . Accessed 21 sept. 2019
  4. Sourceable. Was Frank Lloyd Wright Wrong?. https://sourceable.net/was-frank-lloyd-wright-wrong/ . Accessed : 10 sept. 2018
  5. Hermanmiller. The office as facility based on change. https://www.hermanmiller.com/products/workspaces/workstations/action-office-system/design-story/ . Accessed : 10 sept. 2019
  6. Officeprinciples. What Is Agile Working. https://officeprinciples.com/agile-working/what-is-agile-working . Accessed : 25 may 2019
  7. Spacestor. (2019) Top 8 Workplace Trends for 2019. https://spacestor.com/insights/top-8-workplace-trends-for-2019/. Accessed : 4 Jan 2019
  8. Haynesgroupinc. (2019) Making the Modern Office. https://www.haynesgroupinc.com/haynesdigest/makingthemodernoffice. Accessed : 4 may 2019
  9. Designcouncil. (2019) The principles of inclusive design. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/resources/guide/principles-inclusive-design. Accessed : 12 oct. 2019
Statistics
Article View: 391
PDF Download: 1,459