Determination of the optimum technological criteria under different spinning systems affecting the yarn hairiness
Mahmoud, H. (2019). Determination of the optimum technological criteria under different spinning systems affecting the yarn hairiness. EKB Journal Management System, 9(4), 31-43. doi: 10.21608/idj.2019.82546
Haitham Ahmed Abdel Daim Mahmoud. "Determination of the optimum technological criteria under different spinning systems affecting the yarn hairiness". EKB Journal Management System, 9, 4, 2019, 31-43. doi: 10.21608/idj.2019.82546
Mahmoud, H. (2019). 'Determination of the optimum technological criteria under different spinning systems affecting the yarn hairiness', EKB Journal Management System, 9(4), pp. 31-43. doi: 10.21608/idj.2019.82546
Mahmoud, H. Determination of the optimum technological criteria under different spinning systems affecting the yarn hairiness. EKB Journal Management System, 2019; 9(4): 31-43. doi: 10.21608/idj.2019.82546

Determination of the optimum technological criteria under different spinning systems affecting the yarn hairiness

International Design Journal
Article 2, Volume 9, Issue 4 - Serial Number 32, October 2019, Page 31-43  XML PDF (754.55 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/idj.2019.82546
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Haitham Ahmed Abdel Daim Mahmoud
Lecturer-Spinning, Weaving, and knitting Department, Faculty of Applied Arts, Damietta University, Egypt.
Abstract
Yarn hairiness is reflected the amount of free fibers protruding from the spun yarn body towards the outer yarn surface. From a spinning point of view, studying this phenomenon is considered essential step because it influences the post spinning operation and the characteristics of the end textile structure. Many spinning factors are affecting the yarn hairiness.The main objective of this search is to examine the effect of yarn count and twist multiplier on yarn hairiness under six different spinning systems. Accordingly, three yarn counts (40's, 50's and 60's Ne) and three twist multipliers (4, 4.4 and 4.8) were applied. The used spun systems were carded, combed, carded compact, combed compact, jetring carded and jetring combed systems. Three-dimensional response surface graphs were used to easy and faster understand the results. Results indicated that the lowest hairy yarn was spun by jetring combed spinning system with significant differences compared to the other spinning systems. Jetring carded and combed compact ring spinning systems occupied the second order regarding the production of the least hairy yarns with significant differences than the others. Overall the used spun systems, it is indicated that the hairy yarns may be dramatically decreased with increasing yarn count to a certain extent and then slightly decreased while the hairiness was gradually decreased with increasing twist multiplier. However, the percentage of decrease % of hairy yarn with increasing yarn count was greater than that observed by increasing twist multiplier under all spun systems. Multiple regression analysis exhibited that yarn count and twist multiplier explained the most variation of hairiness expressed as high values of coefficient of determination (R2 %). Also, it is presented that the relative importance % of yarn count toward yarn hairiness was greater than that observed by twist multiplier overall applied spun systems.
Keywords
Compact; Ring Spinning Systems; Hairiness; Twist Multiplier; Jetring
References
  1. Abdel-Ghaffar, Entsar A.F.; G.Y.M. Hammam; A.A.A. El-Hosary; E.M.M. El-Gedwy and A.A. Hassan (2019). Influence of some commercial blends between the imported cotton and the upper Egyptian varieties on technological properties. Annals of Agric. Sci., Moshtohor, Vol. 57 (1): 31 – 38.
  2. Ahmed, S.; M. Syduzzaman; S. Mohmud and M.M. Rahman (2015). Comparative study on ring, rotor and jetring spun yarn. European Scientific Journal, Vol.11: 411-424.
  3. Al Mamun, R; R. Repon; M. Abdul Jalil and A. Jalal Uddin (2017). Comparative study on card yarn properties produced from conventional ring and compact spinning. Universal Journal of Engineering Science, 5(1): 5-10.
  4. Almetwally, A.A. and Salem Mona. M. (2010). Comparison between mechanical properties of fabrics woven from compact and ring spun yarns. AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 10 (1): 35-40.
  5. Altaş, S. and H. Kadoğlu (2006) . Determining fiber properties and linear density effect on cotton yarn hairiness in ring spinning. Fibers & Textile in Eastern Europe, 14 (3): 48-51.
  6. Altas, S. and H. Kadoğlu (2012). Comparison of conventional ring, mechanical compact and pneumatic compact yarn spinning systems. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, Vol. 7, Issue 1: 87-100.
  7. Draper, N.R. and R. Smith (1981). Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and sons, Inc. New York. 704 pp.
  8. El-Sayed, A.M.M., Suzan .H. Sanad and Abeer .S. Arafa (2011). Spinning performance of ELS Egyptian cotton. African Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 4 (11):1276-1283.
  9. El-Sayed, M.A.M. and Suzan H. Sanad (2007). The impact of new spinning technologies on the Egyptian cottons. Autex Res. Journal, Vol.8, No.4: 231-238.
  10. Hager M.A. and A.A. Hassan (2016). Use of correlation and regression analysis in estimating relative importance of fiber properties affecting yarn hairiness in some egyptian cotton genotypes. Int. J. Adv. Res., 4(8): 1274-1284.
  11. Hussein, Kh.M.M.; M.H. Mahmoud and A.A. Hassan (2009). Relative importance of fiber properties affecting yarn hairiness in some Egyptian cotton varieties. Arab Univ. J. Agric. Sci., Ain Shams Univ., 17 (2): 323-332.
  12. Krupincová, G. and M. Meloun (2013). Yarn hairiness versus quality of yarn. The Journal of The Textile Institute, Vol. (104): 1-8.
  13. Mirzaei, M.; A.A.Gharehaghaji and M. Zarrebini (2012). A new method of yarn hairiness reduction by air suction during carding. Textile Research Journal, 82 (20): 2128–2136.
  14. Sanad, S.H.; H.E.M. Mahmoud and M.A.M. El-Sayed (2011). Production of carded compact cotton yarn of comparable quality to the combed conventional ring yarn. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 89 (1): 203-212.
  15. Shad S. S.; M.I. Javed and M. Azam (2004). Imperfections and hairiness of 24s cotton yarn affected by air jet nozzle pressures and winding speeds at autocone. Pak. j. life soc. sci., 2 (2): 118-123.
  16. Skenderi, Z.; D. Kopitar; Z. Vrljičak and G. Iveković (2018). Unevenness of jetring spun yarn in comparison with ring and rotor spun yarn made from micro modal fibers. Tekstil,67 (1-2): 14-26.
  17. Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochron (1989). Statistical Methods. 8th Ed., Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames Iowa, USA.
  18. Türksoy, H.G.; T. Akkaya; D. Vuruşkan and S. Üstüntağ (2018). A comparative analysis of jetring yarn properties with the properties of ring spun yarns. Industria Textila, Vol. 69 (1): 11-16.
  19. Yilmaz, D. and M.R. Usal (2012). Effect of nozzle structural parameters on hairiness of compact-jet yarns. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, Volume 7, Issue 2: 56-65.
Statistics
Article View: 611
PDF Download: 552