EFFECT OF EXTRAORAL AGING CONDITIONS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FACIAL SILICONE ELASTOMER REINFORCED WITH TITANIUM-OXIDE NANOPARTICLES (IN VITRO STUDY) | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 6, Volume 45, Issue 3, December 2020, Page 29-36 PDF (1.04 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.82693 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Nayera S. Radey  1; Ahmed M. Al Shimy2; Dawlat M. Ahmed3
| ||||
| 1Bachelor of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Professor of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Assistant Professor of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Investigators have been searching for ideal maxillofacial prosthetic materials in order to gain patient acceptance and can be fabricated easily in the dental setting. Objectives: To evaluate the influence of adding different concentrations of titanium oxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) on the mechanical properties of facial silicone elastomer (SE) after different extra-oral aging methods. Materials and methods: TiO2 nanoparticles were mixed with MED-4210 maxillofacial silicone elastomer at 1.5 %, 2% and 2.5 % weight percentage (w/w). Unmodified silicone was served as control group. Each of the above groups were evaluated to mechanical properties before aging conditions. Control & 2.5% nano-TiO2 silicone elastomers groups were subjected to six equal aging conditions groups as follow. Dry storage in dark for 6 months, storage in simulated sebum solution for 6 months, storage in simulated acidic perspiration for 6 months, accelerated artificial daylight weathering for 360 hours, storage in antimicrobial silicone-cleaning solution for 30 hours and mixed aging of sebum under UV light for 360 hours. After aging exposures, they were evaluated to the mechanical properties. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, F-test (ANOVA) and Post-hoc pair-wise test. Results:TiO2 nanoparticles addition improved the mechanical properties in terms of tensile strength and percentage elongation, tear strength and shore A hardness of MED-4210 maxillofacial silicon elastomer before and after extra-oral aging conditions (P < 0.05). Pair-wise comparison between control group and 2.5% nano-TiO2 silicone elastomers composite exhibited significant differences according to the mechanical properties after aging. Conclusions: Reinforcement of MED-4210 maxillofacial silicon elastomer with TiO2 nanoparticles introduces a favorable material with physical and anti-ageing properties in our in vitro study. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Nano-TiO2; Silicone elastomer; mechanical properties; artificial ageing | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1-Fouad M, Moudhaffer M. Effect of Disinfection on Some Properties of Heat - Vulcanized Maxillofacial Silicone Elastomer Reinforced by Nano Silicone Dioxide. J Bagh Coll Dentistry. 2016; 325:1-6.
2-Goiato MC, Fernandes AU, dos Santos DM, Barão VA. Positioning Magnets on a Multiple/Sectional Maxillofacial Prosthesis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;7:101-7.
3-Wang L, Liu Q, Jing D, Zhou S, Shao L. Biomechanical properties of nano-TiO2 addit ion to a medical silicone elastomer: The effect of artificial ageing. J Dent. 2014;42:475-83.
4-Hatamleh MM, Polyzois GL, Silikas N, Watts DC. Effect of extraoral aging conditions on mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:439-46.
5-Han Y, Kiat-amnuay S, Powers JM, Zhao Y. Effect of nano-oxide concentration on the mechanical properties of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:465-73.
6-Cochran BW. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical considerations. Toronto: MDMI; 1996.
7-Karthikeyan I. A Review on Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Maxillofacial Region. Anaplastology. 2014;3:2161-1173.
8-Wolfaardt JF, Cleaton‐Jones P, Lownie J. Biocompatibility testing of a silicone maxillofacial prosthetic elastomer: soft tissue study in primates. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:331‐8.
9-Hatamleh MM, Watts DC. Effects of Accelerated Artificial Daylight Aging on Bending Strength and Bonding of Glass Fibers in Fiber-Embedded Maxillofacial Silicone Prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2010;19:357-63.
10-Kiat-amnuay S, Mekayarajjananonth T, Powers JM, Chambers MS, Lemon JC. Interactions of pigments and opacifiers on color stability of MDX4-4210/type A maxillofacial elastomers subjected to artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:249-57.
11-Rahman AM, Jamayet NB, Nizami MMUI, Johari Y, Husein A, Alam MK. Effect of Aging and Weathering on the Physical Properties of Maxillofacial Silicone Elastomers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:36-48.
12-Eleni PN, Katsavou L, Krokida MK, Polyzois GL. Color Stability of Facial Silicone Prosthetic Elastomers after Artificial Weathering. Dent Res J. 2008;5:71-9.
13-Mohite UH, Sandrik JL, Land MF, Byrne G. Environmental factors affecting mechanical properties of facial prosthetic elastomers. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7:479‐ 86.
14-Gopinadh A, Prakash M, Lohitha K, Kishore KK, Chowdary AS, Dev JR. The changing phase of prosthodontics: Nanotechnology. J Dent Allied Sci. 2015;4:78-83.
15-Goiato MC, Andreotti AM, Moreno A, Nóbrega AS, Pesqueira AA, dos Santos DM. Influence of nanoparticles on color stability, microhardness, and flexural strength of acrylic resins specific for ocular prosthesis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:5779-87.
16-Mirabedini SM, Mohseni M, Pazokifard SH, Esfandeh M. Effect of TiO2 on the mechanical and adhesion properties of RTV silicone elastomer coatings. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2008;317:80-6.
17-Nobrega AS, Andreotti AM, Moreno A, Sinhoreti MAC, dos Santos DM, Goiato MC. Influence of adding nanoparticles on the hardness, tear strength, and permanent deformation of facial silicone subjected to accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:623-9.
18-Shakir DA, Abdul-Ameer FM. Effect of nano-titanium oxide addition on some mechanical properties of silicone elastomers for maxillofacial prostheses. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2018;13:281-90.
19-Eltayyar NH, Alshimy AM, Abushelib MN. Evaluation of intrinsic color stability of facial silicone elastomer reinforced with different nanoparticles. ADJ. 2016;41:50- 4.
20-Zayed SM, Alshimy AM, Fahmy AE. Effect of Surface Treated Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles on Some Mechanical Properties of Maxillofacial Silicone Elastomer. Int J Biomater. 2014;2014:750398.
21-ASTM D1349. Standard temperature for testing. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2014.
22-ASTM D2240-05. Standard test method for rubber property durometer hardness. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2010.
23-ASTM D412,Standard test methods for conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers- Tension, West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2002.
24-ASTM D624-00. Standard test method for tear strength of conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2013
25-Hatamleh MM, Watts DC. Mechanical properties and bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers. Dent Mater J. 2010;26:185-91.
26-Al-Dharrab AA, Tayel SB, Abodaya MH. The Effect of Different Storage Conditions on the Physical Properties of Pigmented Medical Grade I Silicone Maxillofacial Material. ISRN Dent. 2013;2013:582051.
27-ASTM G155-13 standard practice for operating xenon Arc light apparatus for exposure of non-metallic materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.
28-IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; Released 2012.
29-Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. London, California, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013.
30-Lemon JC, Chambers MS, Jacobsen ML, Powers JM. Color stability of facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:613-8.
31-Ahmed B, Butt AM, Hussain M, Amin M, Yazdanie N. Rehabilitaton of Nose Using Silicone Based Maxillofacial Prosthesis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010;20:65-7.
32-Montgomery PC, Kiat-Amnuay S. Survey of Currently Used Materials for Fabrication of Extraoral Maxillofacial Prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. J Prosthodont. 2009;19:482-90.
33-Al-Harbi FA, Ayad NM, Saber MA, ArRejaie AS, Morgano SM. Mechanical behavior and color change of prosthetic elastomers after outdoor weathering in a hot and humid climate. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:146-51.
34-Bangera BS, Guttal SS. Evaluation of varying concentrations of nano-oxides as ultraviolet protective agents when incorporated in maxillofacial silicones: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1567-72.
35-Cevik P, Eraslan O. Effects of the Addition of Titanium Dioxide and Silaned Silica Nanoparticles on the Mechanical Properties of Maxillofacial Silicones. J Prosthodont. 2016;26:611-5.
36-Yu R, Koran A, Craig RG. Materials Science. J Dent Res. 1980;59:1041-7.
37-Manjula N. Effect of denture cleansers and accelerated aging on the color stability of maxillofacial silicone: An in vitro study. Indian J Multidiscip Dent. 2017;7:110-5.
38-Shihab NM, Abdul-Ameer FM. Studying some mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer before and after incorporation of intrinsic pigments and artificial aging. FDJ. 2018;4:244-52.
39-Zhu AJ, Sternstein S. Nonlinear viscoelasticity of nanofilled polymers: interfaces, chain statistics and properties recovery kinetics. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:1113-26.
40-Xia L, Xu Z, Sun L, Gaveney PM, Zhang MJ. Nano-fillers to tune Young’s modulus of silicone matrix. J Nanoparticle Res. 2013;15:1-11.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 439 PDF Download: 736 |
||||
