Best Interactivity practices for effective packaging design; "multiple case studies." | ||||
| International Design Journal | ||||
| Article 19, Volume 9, Issue 3 - Serial Number 31, July 2019, Page 201-208 PDF (497.95 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/idj.2019.82825 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Mervat Medhat Ali Mohamed Youssef | ||||
| Associate Professor Graphic Design program, College of Mass communication, Ajman University, UAE Associate Professor Art and Design Academy, Higher Institute of Applied Arts 6th October, Cairo, Egypt D.mervatmedhat@gmail.com | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| With the tremendous technological boom we are experiencing today, which naturally led to the rapid change in the nature of consumers, recipients of advertising messages and their desire for more control and participation, consumer experience has played an effective role in packaging design and the emergence of innovative ideas for attractive and interactive packaging that affects the final purchasing decision of the consumer. Packaging design is the latest promotional tool affecting the consumer before the purchase process immediately. The interactive packaging is a new concept that enables designers to create direct advertising messages that are not only more targeted and integrated to suit the rush lifestyle of the consumer, but also provide a range of options in a fun interactive experience, this experience could either with the packaging or the product inside or with the advertising message to enable them learn more about the product and brand and enhance the recognition image of the producing company.The experience between consumer and interactive packaging goes through several stages start from attracting attention and arousing his curiosity, that drives him to select the package and carry it to start interact and identify its advantages. In this time experience creates a aesthetics relationship between package and consumer. The aesthetics of the package design greatly affect our perception of the product’s value. The research aims to study different forms or interactive levels in package design includes the simple interactive structure shape and die cut of the package itself and the possibility of interact with it in an innovative and enjoyable experience, or by using the interactive functionality of the package, such as preservation and protection in active and smart package, this could provide important information about the validity of the product and its interaction with the surrounding context. or by using of new techniques and technology like using of multimedia, 2D, 3D design and augmented reality (AR), which adds a dimension interaction in deeper level with the consumer, enable package to start promote to itself. The importance of research is in conducting an analytical study of the different forms of interaction in package design and study the extent of their impact on the purchasing decisions of the consumer and how it leads to enhance the recognition image of the product and producing company. In spite of the importance and modernity of this topic, interactive package has not been addressed and studied at its various levels adequately in many studies. The study has followed the analytical descriptive method through an analytical study of different models of interactive packaging. The study concluded that adopting interactive design ideas and utilizing different technologies helps the designer to develop and create new advertising ideas with a distinctive experience in packaging design. enhance Consumer purchasing decisions, the relationship between producer and producer, strength the recognition image of the company and loyalty of the expected consumers. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Costumer experience; smart package; active package; interactive package; augmented reality AR | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. أﺣﻣد ﺑرﻗﺎوی. 30 ﻣﺎﯾو، (2016)، ﺑﯾن ﺛﻘﺎﻓﺔ اﻟﺗﻔﻛﯾر وﺛﻘﺎﻓﺔ اﻟﺗﺳﻠﯾﺔ. ﺟرﯾدة اﻟﺑﯾﺎن. 2. بسنت مصطفى أمین ، ٢٠١٨، استخدام الإعلان التفاعلی فی مجالات التسویق الاجتماعی مجلة التصمیم الدولیة ، العدد ٨ الإصدار ٤ 3. ﺑﺳﯾوﻧﻲ, ع. ا ،(1994)، ﻣﻘدﻣﺔ اﻟذﻛﺎء اﻻﺻطﻧﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﻠﻛﻣﺑﯾوﺗر ، اﻟﻘﺎھرة : دار اﻟﻧﺷر اﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺎت اﻟﻣﺻرﯾﺔ، ﻣﻛﺗﺑﺔ اﻟوﻓﺎء. 4. ﺧﺑراء اﻟﻣﺟﻣوﻋﺔ اﻟﻌرﺑﯾﺔ ﻟﺗدرﯾب واﻟﻧﺷر، (2012)، اﻻﺗﺻﺎل اﻟﻠﻔظﻲ واﻟﻐﯾر ﻟﻔظﻲ .اﻟﻘﺎھرة: اﻟﻣﺟﻣوﻋﺔ اﻟﻌرﺑﯾﺔ ﻟﻠﻧﺷر واﻟﺗوزﯾﻊ. 5. د.ﻋﺑد اﻟرﺣﻣن ﻣﺣﻣد ﺳﻌﯾد اﻟﺷﺎﻣﻲ .)(2015 .ﻣﻌﺿﻠﺔ اﻟﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ وﺳﺎﺋل اﻷﺗﺻﺎل اﻟﺟدﯾدة .اﻟﻘﺎھرة: ﻧﮭﺿﺔ ﻣﺻر ﻟﻠﻧﺷر واﻟﺗوزﯾﻊ. 6. عائشة مصطفى المنیاوی، سلوک المستهلک المفاهیم والاسترارتیجیات، مکتبة عین شمس، القاهرة، مصر، الطبعة الثانیة،1998 ،†ص†163 7. شفیق, ح . (2010) .اﻻﻋﻼم اﻟﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﻲ وﻣﺎ ﺑﻌد اﻟﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﯾﺔ .اﻟﻘﺎھرة: دار ﻓﻛر وﻓن ﻟﻠطﺑﺎﻋﺔ. 8. . ﻓﺿﯾﻠﺔ, ت ، (2011)، ﺗﻛﻧوﻟوﺟﯾﺎ اﻻﺗﺻﺎل"اﻟﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﯾﺔ وﻋﻼﻗﺗﮭﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺣﺑث اﻟﻌﻠﻣﻲ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻟﺟزاﺋرﯾﺔ ."ﻣﺟﻠﺔ اﻟﻌﻠوم اﻻﻧﺳﺎﻧﯾﺔ واﻻﺟﺗﻣﺎﻋﯾﺔ ,ﻋدد ﺧﺎص) اﻟﺣﺎﺳوب وﺗﻛﻧوﻟوﺟﯾﺎ اﻟﻣﻌﻠوﻣﺎت ﻓﻲ اﻟﺗﻌﻠﯾم اﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ .499 , 9. ﻣﺣﻣد اﻟﺑری. )20 ﻓﺑراﯾر, 2017(. اﻟﺑری- دراﺳﮫ ﻣﺗﻛﺎﻣﻠﮫ ﻋن اﻟﺗﺳوﯾق واﻟدﻋﺎﯾﺔ واﻻﻋﻼن. ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ اﻻﺳﺗرداد 2 April, 2017، ﻣن ﻣوﻗﻊ ﻧﺎب ﻟﻠدﻋﺎﯾﺔ واﻻﻋﻼن: https://www.nabadv.com/articles-ar/ﻣﻘﺎﻻت-اﻟﻣﺗﺧﺻﺻﯾن/416-advertising-study.htm 10. محمد محمود أحمد شحاتة، إینٌاس محمود محمد ، إلهام رشدی شطا، 2018،الأسالیبٌ التفاعلیةٌ اللاإلکترونیةٌ ودورها فی تصمیمٌ الإعلان التفاعلی ، مجلة العمارة والفنون، العدد الحادی عشر – الجزء الثانی 11. محمد فرید الصحن، اﻟﺘﺴﻮﯾﻖ اﻟﻤﻔﺎھﯿﻢ واﻻﺳﺘﺮاﺗﯿﺠﯿﺎت، اﻟﺪار اﻟﺠﺎﻣﻌﯿﺔ، رﻣﻞ، اﻻﺳﻜﻨﺪرﯾﺔ، 1998 12. نصر, ح. م ، (2015) .اﺗﺟﺎھﺎت اﻟﺑﺣث واﻟﺗﻧظﯾر ﻓﻲ وﺳﺎﺋل اﻻﻋﻼم اﻟﺟدﯾدة .ﻣؤﺗﻣر وﺳﺎﺋل اﻟﺗواﺻل اﻻﺟﺗﻣﺎﻋﻲ .)(p. 13اﻟرﯾﺎض: ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ اﻻﻣﺎم ﻣﺣﻣد ﺑن ﺳﻌود اﻻﺳﻼﻣﯾﺔ. المراجع الأجنبیة 13. Ahmad, N., MohibBillo & Asad Lakhan, A., (2012), Effect of Product Packaging in Consumer Buying Decision, Journal of Business Strategies, Vol.6, No. 2, 2012. 14. Amin Asadollahi, Mojtaba Givee , 2011, The role of graphic design in packaging and sales of production in Iran, Contemporary Marketing Review Vol.1(5), pp. 30 – 34, Available online at: http://wwww.businessjournalz.org/cmr 15. and the internet of things? Retrieved from. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ 16. and-the-internet-of-things/#309bf6e078a4 17. Arens, W. (2007), Contemporary Advertising, European journal of Marketing , 25 (3). 18. Bloch, P.H. (1995), “Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, July. 19. Caudell, T., Mizell, D.: “Augmented Reality: An Application of Heads-Up Display Technology to Manual Manufacturing Process”, Proceedings of Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, volume 2, (Kauai, HI, USA, 1992) 659 – 669. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317 20. Gary R. Holmes, Audhesh Paswan, 2012, Consumer reaction to new package design, April 2012, Journal of Product & Brand Management 21(2):109-116, DOI: 10.1108/10610421211215553 21. Heer vyas , Bhuvanesh v,2015, packaging design elements and users perception: a context in fashion branding and communication, Journal of Applied Packaging Research, 22. Jugger, S. (2008) The power of packaging, Admap Magzine, October 2008. 23. Klaus G Grunert, Food Quality and Safety: Consumer Perception and Demand, February 2005, European Review of Agricultural Economics 32(3):369-391, DOI: , 10.1093/eurrag/jbi01 24. Kuvykaite, R., Dovaliene, A. and Navickiene, L. (2009) 'Impact of Consumer Package Communication on Consumer Decision Making Process', Economics & Management 25. Louw, A., Kimber, M. (2007), The Power of Packaging: The Customer Equity Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of TNS (UK), available at: www.tnsglobal.com/_assets/files/The_power_of_packaging.pdf 26. McCabe, D.B. and Nowlis, S.M. (2003), “The effect of examining actual products or product descriptions on consumer preference”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 13 No. 4. 27. Mersid Poturak, 2014, Influence of Product Packaging on Purchase Decisions, European Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 2014,Vol.(3), No 3 28. Miguel A. Cerqueira, Maristiina Nurmi , Diana Gregor-Svetec, INTELLIGENT PACKAGING 29. Moorinsights/2015/10/01/what-does-food-packaging-have-to-do-with-bigdata- 30. Murphy, I.P. (1997), “Study: packaging important in trial purchase”, Marketing News, 3 February. 31. NG., W. X. (2011). A Study of Interactivity in Art and Design. Journal of Textile andApparel, 15(3), 139. 32. Nelson, P. (1974), “Advertising as information”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 78. 33. Pilditch, J. (1973), The silent salesman: How to Develop Packaging That Sells, London: Business Books Ltd. 34. Ratneshwar, S. and Chaiken, S. (1991), “Comprehension’s role in persuasion: the case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18, June, 35. Silayoi, P (2006). Packaging and Purchase Decisions, British Food Journal, Vol.106 No 8, 2006, pp. 607-608. 36. Smith, P (2006). Marketing Communications: an Integrated Approach (4th edition). London: Kogan Page. 37. Steenkamp, J.E.M. (1990), “Conceptual model of the quality perception process”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 21. 38. Stewart, B. (2004) Packaging Design Strategy, 2nd edn., Leatherhead: Pira International. 39. Sylvie Martin, Jean Pierre Védrine, Marketing- les concepts clés, édition CHIHAB, Alger, 1996. 40. Wilder, C. (2015, October 1). What does food packaging have to do with big data 41. https://www.tpgint.com/packaging-sectors/design-innovation-and-awards/ 42. http://brandcheck.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Brandcheck_Augmented-Reality-for-Packaging_Final.pdf 43. http://brandcheck.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Brandcheck_Augmented-Reality-for-Packaging_Final.pdf 44. http://www.swedbrand-group.com/blog/augmented-reality-revolutionizing-packaging-industry 45. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2011/10/27/heinz-launches-ketchup-augmented-reality-trial-blippar 46. http://www.swedbrand-group.com/blog/augmented-reality-revolutionizing-packaging-industry 47. ID TechEx. (2004). Intelligent and smart packaging conference 2004. Retrieved April 30, 2007, | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 637 PDF Download: 510 |
||||
