Risk management strategies of cultural heritage case study: Tel Basta archaeological site | ||||
| International Design Journal | ||||
| Article 26, Volume 9, Issue 3 - Serial Number 31, July 2019, Page 281-292 PDF (1.25 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/idj.2019.82832 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Doaa Mohamed Tahoon1; Yasmine Sabry Hegazi2 | ||||
| 1Assistant lecturer- Architecture department- Zagazige university- Egypt | ||||
| 2Associate Professor- Architecture department- Zagazige university- Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The List of World Heritage in Danger is funded by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1972. The list is an essential element in protecting world heritage and in increasing international awareness with the importance of risk management. The list includes 38 cultural world heritage sites all over the world. They are suffering from many risks which may lead to loss their historical and cultural values, that require a study to classify and analysis those risks from information presented to the World Heritage Bureau and World Heritage Committee, and within ICOMOS Mission and Evaluation Reports, between 1980 and 2018, then identifying suitable strategies to address the various types of risks and place them within a specific classification which will be applied on the study area: Tel Basta archaeological site in Sharkia Governorate in Egypt. The region is suffering from many threats and risks that may cause huge deterioration to it. The research based on combined strategy between analytical method and case study method, to reach a good understanding of various types of risks and strategies and placed them within a specific classification, in addition to help professionals and stakeholders to choose the suitable strategies to manage risk effectively, and to conserve cultural property to next generations. Research Objective: The main objective of the research is “producing risk management strategies to address the various types of risks and place them within a specific classification for helping professionals and stakeholders to choose the suitable strategies to manage risk effectively”. Research problem : Cultural heritage is suffering from many threats and risks that may cause huge deterioration to it, in addition to historical and cultural values loss, So there is a need to understand and analysis the various types of risks to give the ability to choose the suitable risk management strategies. Research Methodology: Analytical method to classify and analysis those risks from information presented to the World Heritage Bureau and World Heritage Committee, and within ICOMOS Mission and Evaluation Reports, between 1980 and 2018, then identifying suitable strategies to address the various types of risks and place them within a specific classification. case study method by using Linear Analytic to apply the proposed classification on the case study area. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| list of world heritage in danger; cultural property; risk classification; risk management strategies; Tel Basta archaeological site | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1) AS/NZS. (2004). Risk management, 3rd Edition. Sydney, Australia and Standards New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand: Standards Australia International Ltd.
2) PMI. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)5th. Pennsylvania ,USA: Project Management Institute.
3) APM. (2010). Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide, 2nd Edition. Buckinghamshire, UK: APM Risk Management Specific Interest Group, The Association for Project Management.
4) Demas, M. (2002). Planning for conservation and management of archaeological sites: a valuesbased approach. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
5) H Stovel. (1998). Risk Preparedness: A Management Manual for World Heritage. Roma: International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM).
6) HM Treasury. (2004). The Orange Book: Management of Risk - Principles. london, UK: HM Treasury.
7) ICCORM. (2016). A Guide to Risk Management of Cultural Heritage. Government of Canada: Canadian Conservation Institute.
8) ICOMOS. (2014). Heritage at risk: world report 2011-2013 on monumnetnts and sites in danger. berlin: hendrik Bäßler verlag.
9) Lange , E. (2011, January 7). the EES Amelia Edwards ProjectFund: Tell Basta. Research Gate, pp. 1-3.
10) Lange, E., & Baumahauer, R. (2016, January). Remote sensing in the Nile Delta: Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Bubastis/ tell Basta. Resarch Gate, pp. 377-392.
11) M Demas. (2002). Planning for conservation and management of archaeological sites: a valuesbased approach. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
12) Marta Quaranta. (2012). Cultural heritage and Risk Assessment: An European Overview. International Conferenence on Cultural Heritage Preservation. Split, Croatia.
13) Muhammad Thaheem . (2014). Project Risk Management for Sustainable Restoration of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Lessons from Construction Industry and Formulation of a Customized PRM Model. POLITECNICO DI TORINO.
14) PMI. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)5th. Pennsylvania ,USA: Project Management Institute.
15) Quaranta, M. (2012). Cultural heritage and Risk Assessment: An European Overview. International Conferenence on Cultural Heritage Preservation. Split, Croatia.
16) R Waller. (2003). Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model: Development and Application to Preventive Conservation at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute.
17) Rosenow, D. (2008, april 4). The Great temple of Bastet at Bubastis. Research Gate, pp. 11-13.
18) Salah, A. Z. (2014). The Disaster Risk management plan for the krak des chevaliers (Alhosn Castle) in syria. Kyoto, Japan: Ritsumeikan univerisity.
19) Stovel, H. (1998). Risk Preparedness: A Management Manual for World Heritage. Roma: International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM).
20) Thaheem , M. (2014). Project Risk Management for Sustainable Restoration of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Lessons from Construction Industry and Formulation of a Customized PRM Model. POLITECNICO DI TORINO.
21) The MITRE Institute. (2014). MITRE Systems Engineering Guide. MITRE Corporate Communications and Public Affairs.
22) The UK Office of Government Commerce (OCG). (2010). Management of Risk: Guidance for Practitioners, 3rd Edition. UK: APMG in conjunction with the Cabinet Office (part of HM Government).
23) UNESCO WHC. (1972). World heritage convention. Paris: UNESCO.
24) UNESCO WHC. (2007). The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention.
25) UNESCO WHC. (2010). Managing Disaster Risks for World Heritage: World Heritage Resource Manual. Paris: UNESCO WHC.
26) UNESCO WHC. (2012). Risk Management AT Heritage Sites: Acase Study of the Petra World Heritage Site. UNESCO and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Engineering, Raymond Lemaire International Centre for Conservation..
27) UNESCO WHC. (2019, 2 1). whc.unesco.org. Retrieved 1 3, 2019, from https://whc.unesco.org/en/danger.
28) UNESCO World Hertiage Committee. ( 2018). Decisions adopted during the 42nd session of the World Heritage Committee. Manama, Bahrain: UNESCO WHC.
29) UNESCO World Hertiage Committee. (1972). Report of the Rapporteur sixth session. Paris: UNESCO.
30) Unisdr. (2009). Risk and Poverty in a Changing Climate. International Strategy for disaster reduction Sec.
31) Waller, R. (2003). Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model: Development and Application to Preventive Conservation at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Ottawa: Canadian Conservation Institute.
32) ابراهیم خلیل بظاظو. (2014). إدارة المخاطر فی المواقع التراثیة والأثریة :دارسة حالة موقع أم الرصاص للتراث العالمی. الاردن: جامعة الشرق الاوسط. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 427 PDF Download: 1,201 |
||||
