Sustaining Nubian Symbols through Textile Design | ||||
| International Design Journal | ||||
| Article 16, Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 30, April 2019, Page 197-205 PDF (406.48 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/idj.2019.83488 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Nahed Baba | ||||
| ,Assistant Professor, Faculty of Specific Education, Ain Shams University, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Digital textile design facilitates the transformation of textile surfaces, allowing designers to explore new ways to perfect their craft. The aim of this study is to investigate how the creation of modern designs inspired by Nubian symbols can retain a special appeal to contemporary audience while preserving the wealth of symbolic meanings associated with the old Nubian heritage. To that end, the research is employing Nubian symbols in the designs and a qualitative methodology through questionnaires. The latter was also used to showcase twenty-four designs and contact participants with specialization and from different cultural backgrounds/ citizenship (i.e. Nubians, non-Nubian), in an attempt to assess whether there is a difference of opinions among experts as far as succeeding to sustain the Nubian symbols by using textile design and computer graphic software is concerned. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Nubian heritage; Semiotics; Textile Design | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Barnard, M. (2001). Approaches to Understanding Visual Culture. New York: Palgrave. 2. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Translated by A. Lavers. London: Jonathan Cape. 3. Curtin, B. (2006). Semiotics and visual representation. International Program in Design and Architecture, 51-62. 4. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e106/68409de8b1ab9b1965fee0a94432699e074d.pdf. 5. Deni, M., & Zingale, S. (2017). Semiotics in Design Education. Semiotics by Design. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1293-S1303. 6. Fiske, J. (2010). Introduction to communication studies. Routledge. 7. Guiraud, P. (1975) Semiology. Translated by G. Gross. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 8. Häberle, J. (2013). The Meticulous Way of Design Thinking. http://janinehaeberle.ch/wp-janine/wpcontent/uploads/2013/12/Paper_HaeberleHSLU_DigitalFashionConference_2013.pdf. 9. Kleinitz, C. (2013). Between valorisation and devaluation: making and unmaking (world) heritage in Sudan. Archaeologies, 9(3), 427-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-013-9249-9 10. O’Sullivan, T., et al., (1994) Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural 11. Studies. London: Routledge. 12. Peirce, C. S. (1986) ‘Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs’ in Innis, R. E. (eds.), Semiotics: An Introductory Reader. London: Hutchinson. 13. Rose, G. (2002). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage. 14. Rowan, K. (2017). Flooded lands, forgotten voices: Safeguarding the indigenous languages and intangible heritage of the Nubian Nile valley. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 12, 175-187. 15. Russell, A. P. (2015, April). Repeatless: transforming surface pattern with generative design. In Shapeshifting: A Conference on Transformative Paradigms of Fashion and Textile Design. 16. Tamborrino, R., & Wendrich, W. (2017). Cultural heritage in context: the temples of Nubia, digital technologies and the future of conservation. Journal of the Institute of Conservation, 40(2), 168-182. 17. Ujiie, H. (2006). Design and workflow in digital ink-jet printing. Digital Printing of Textiles, Woodhead Publishing, 337-56 18. Vladimir, P., & Ludmila, M. (2018). Semiotic Models in Museum Communication. Muzeológia a Kultúrne Dedičstvo, 6(1), 2 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 422 PDF Download: 1,114 |
||||
