Utilizing the integration between digital technology and interactive design to create contemporary jewelry | ||||
| International Design Journal | ||||
| Article 39, Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 26, April 2018, Page 427-437 PDF (629.45 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/idj.2018.86143 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Salwa Abdel Naby1; Amira Fouad Anwar2; Nahla Hasan Ali3 | ||||
| 1Professor of Jewelry, Department of Metal Products & Jewelry, Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University | ||||
| 2Lecturer, Department of Metal Products & Jewelry – Faculty of Applied Arts, Benha University | ||||
| 3Assistant Lecturer, Department of Metal Products & Jewelry, Faculty of Applied Arts, Benha University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The enormous technological development has made the computerized gadgets wearable and enhanced them with special and distinct functional abilities. The robotic, molecules and Nano technologies scientific development in recent years; which produced intelligent, simulating and invisible materials among other elements; has helped in developing electronics and in minimizing their sizes to the extent that allows them to be integrated in all wearables. Jewelry is one of the distinctive wearables, due to its various sizes, their intimacy and close proximity to the human body, which allow more interaction with its wearer. Although jewelry has a simple and limited function as adornments; it also symbolizes special life events or parts of our history. Wedding rings, memorable pendants or inherited pieces of jewelry which we may never wear, remind us of their previous owners, the events during which they have worn them and our feelings towards them. The combination between micro-computers and increased computerized power has allowed many enterprises to start producing contemporary, creative, interactive and intelligent jewelry; known as the digital jewelry. The integration between both concepts of jewelry design and interactive design; can enhance the processes of contemporary jewelry design, as well as discovering substitutes to the traditional applications of technology. Research problem: The research seeks to alter the traditional approaches used by jewelry designers; and make them depend more on the ideas and concepts appropriate with interactive design and digital technology, in order to make jewelry design a real equivalent to the rapid changes that are a major feature of our time. There are also obvious differences between the digital jewelry prototypes designed by electrical engineers and industrial designers and those designed by jewelry designers, although both have some shortages and disadvantages. This is why the research attempts to study the usage and sensory demands of the jewelry wearer to standardize them artistically and structurally. Research objective: The research aims to find an integrated relation between digital technology and the art of jewelry design within the range of the novel demands of the user. Research significance: - Utilizing digital technology and interactive design concepts in creating new approaches that can be used to design jewelry. - Unfolding new horizons that lead to different life and usable applications of contemporary jewelry design. Research themes: - Identification of digital technology and interactive design. - Terminology concerned with digital jewelry. - Requirements of digital jewelry design. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Interactive Design; Digital Technology; Digital Jewelry; Wearable technology | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Bhat, A., Badri, P., & Reddi, U. S. (2014, December). Wearable Devices: The Next Big Thing in CRM. Cognizant 20-20 Insights. Teaneck, USA: Cognizant. 2. Body Design. (2016, July 15). Retrieved from IDEO: https://www.ideo.com/news/body-design 3. ÇİÇEK, M. (2015, April). WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES AND ITS FUTURE APPLICATIONS. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Data Communication, 3(4), pp. 45-50. 4. Fortmann, J., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2015). User Requirements for Digital Jewellery. British HCI Conference (pp. 119-125). Lincoln: ACM. 5. Fortmann, J., M¨uller, H., Boll, S., & Heuten, W. (2013). Illumee: Aesthetic Light Bracelet as a Wearable Information Display for Everyday Life. UbiComp 2013 (pp. 393-396). Zurich, Switzerland: ACM. 6. Hännikäinen, J. (2006, November 24). Electronic intelligence development for wearable applications. Doctoral dissertation. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology. 7. Jain, A. (2015). DIGITAL JEWELRY A ‘Fashionable’ leap in the field of wireless networking. International Conference on “Computing for Sustainable Global Development” (pp. 388-392). New Delhi: IEEE. 8. Jary, S. (2017, July 10). Fitbit Flex 2 review. Retrieved from Tech Advisor: https://www.techadvisor.co.uk/review/activity-trackers/fitbit-flex-2-review-3468264/ 9. Jhajharia, S., S K Pal, & Verma, S. (2014, july). Wearable Computing and its Application. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(4), pp. 5700-5704. 10. Kalinauckas, A. (2015, july 9). Wearable technology. Engineering & Technology, 10(4), pp. 36-43. 11. leaf SMART JEWELRY. (2016, june). Retrieved from Bellabeat: https://webshop.bellabeat.com/ 12. Ledger, D. (2014, July). Inside Wearables - Part 2. Endeavour Partners. 13. LUDVIGSSON, M. (2005). Reflection through interaction. MSc Thesis. Göteborg, Sweden: Department of Computer Science, IT UNIVERSITY OF GÖTEBORG. 14. Miner, C., Chan, D., & Campbell, C. (2001). Digital jewelry: wearable technology for everyday life. Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 45-46). Seattle: ACM. 15. Molina-Markham, A., A. Peterson, R., Skinner, J., J. Halter, R., Sorber, J., & Kotz, D. (2014). Poster: Enabling computational jewelry for mHealth applications. MobiSys Mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 374-375). New York: ACM New York. 16. Niemantsverdriet, K., & Versteeg, M. (2016). Interactive Jewellery as Memory Cue: Designing a Sound Locket for Individual Reminiscence. TEI '16 Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 532-538). Eindhoven, Netherlands: ACM. 17. P. O., & J. W. (2009). Digital technologies and the emotional family. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, pp. 204–214. 18. Perrault, S., Lecolinet, E., Eagan, J., & Guiard, Y. (2013). Watchit: simple gestures and eyes-free interaction for wristwatches and bracelets. CHI '13 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1451-1460). Paris, France: ACM. 19. Popat, K., & Sharma, P. (2013, July). Wearable Computer Applications A Future Perspective. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 3(1). 20. preece, H., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design : beyond human- computer interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 21. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2015). INTERACTION DESIGN beyond human–computer interaction (4th Edition ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 22. RINGLY LUXE. (2017, 4 28). Retrieved from RINGLY: https://ringly.com/products/smart-ring 23. Salmela, E., Happonen, A., Hirvimäki, M., & Vimm, I. (2015). Is Time Pressure an Advantage or a Disadvantage for Front End Innovation – Case Digital Jewelry. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(4), pp. 42-69. 24. Seymour, S. (2008). Fashionable Technology: The Intersection of Design, Fashion, Science, and Technology. Walter de Gruyter & Co. 25. Silina, Y., & Haddadi, H. (2015). “New Directions in Jewelry”: a Close Look at Emerging Trends & Developments in Jewelry-like Wearable Devices. ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 49-56). Osaka: ACM. 26. Tsaknaki, V., Fernaeus, Y., & Jonsson, M. (2015). Precious Materials of Interaction – Exploring Interactive Accessories as Jewellery Items. Nordes 2015: Design Ecologies. Stockholm: Nordic Design Research. 27. Versteeg, M., van den Hoven, E., & Hummels, C. (2016). Interactive Jewellery: a design exploration. TEI '16 Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 44-52). Eindhoven, Netherlands: ACM. 28. Wallace, J. (2007, July). Emotionally charged: A practice-centred enquiry of digital jewellery and personal emotional significance. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Hallam University, doctoral thesis. 29. Wallace, J., & Dearden, A. (2005). Digital jewellery as experience. In A. Pirhonen, P. Saariluoma, H. Isoma¨ki, & C. Roast, Future Interaction Design (pp. 193-216). Springer. 30. Wallace, J., Dearden, A., & Fisher, T. (2007, April 6). The significant other: the value of jewellery in the conception, design and experience of body focused digital devices. AI & SOCIETY, pp. 53-62. 31. أیمن محمد محمد. (2010). تکنولوجیا المعلومات واستخداماتها فى مجال عرض التصمیم. رسالة ماجستیر غیر منشورة. القاهرة، مصر: کلیة الفنون التطبیقیة جامعة حلوان. 32. جورج وجیه عزیز. (1 یولیو, 2015). التصمیم التفاعلى والتقنیات الحدیثة لأسالیب التعلم والمساهمة فى رفع جودة التعلیم. مجلة الفنون والعلوم التطبیقیة، الصفحات 201-212. 33. جیهان فؤاد محمد محمود. (بلا تاریخ). مستقبل التصمیم لذوی الاحتیاجات الخاصة فی ضوء التصمیم التفاعلی. المؤتمر الدولى الثالث عشر لکلیة الفنون التطبیقیة التصمیم بین الابتکاریة والاستدامة. القاهرة: کلیة الفنون التطبیقیة. 34. محمد حسن الخشاب، یاسر سعید بنداری، رشا محمد زینهم، و مروة عبد الله حمزاوی. (1 اکتوبر, 2016). اثر التصمیم التفاعلى للزجاج فى إعادة تأهیل واستخدام المنشأت الأثریة "سبیل قایتبای-القاهرة- نموذج". مجلة العمارة والفنون والعلوم الإنسانیة. 35. محمود علم الدین. (1990). تکنولجیا المعلومات وصناعة الإتصال الجماهیرى. القاهرة: العربی للنشر والتوزیع. 36. می سمیر کامل. (1 ینایر, 2015). ارجونومیة. تصمیم الموضة التفاعلیة باستخدام تکنولوجیا SCB. مجلة التصمیم الدولیة، الصفحات 163-155. 37. هایدى ودیع وهبه. (2011). تصمیم العاطفة کمدخل لتصمیم المنتج. رسالة ماجستیر غیر منشورة. القاهرة، مصر: جامعة حلوان کلیة الفنون التطبیقیة. 38. وائل رأفت. (2008). التفاعلیة کنموذج لتکامل الفراغ الداخلى الإلکترونی. مؤتمر الفنون الجمیلة فى مصر 100 عام من الابداع. القاهرة. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 351 PDF Download: 368 |
||||
