Directions of design solutions for Administration Buildings | ||||
| International Design Journal | ||||
| Article 15, Volume 7, Issue 3 - Serial Number 23, July 2017, Page 171-185 PDF (3.42 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.12816/0044134 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Sahar Ezz EL Arab Ramadan | ||||
| Lecture, Decore department, Interior Architectural Section, Al Shorouk Academy | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The administration buildings is a distinctive and important types of building classification Because of its importance stems from its areas , and the number of occupants ,whether from employees or public works intended for these buildings . The administration buildings deal with a large number of employees who differ in the scientific levels , between administrative staff ,reception staff, and staff performing specific tasks and think about each level individually , which is certainly reflected in the choice of the direction of the solution appropriate to design him , and found that through our study of administration buildings that trends in design solutions are divided into two grounds :First slit , design of the treatment of the building itself, whether this stretch horizontally or vertically ,Second, prong design which is directly related to the internal design is a direct reflections ,which leads us to study the appropriate administrative buildings projections that donot come out three patterns ,while open plan or closed or semi closed . The objective of this study that the administration buildings are classified among the buildings most dealing with furniture and office supplies , which depends on the distribution of a number of factors , which affects the architectural design of the building mainly ,and therefore there is a direct connection between the same treatment and treatment its horizontal plans . Problem: There are many administration building in Egypt , but we must ask ourselves this question ,Did the administration buildings in Egypt achieve the minimum required functional and utilitarian purposes required of them ? Aims: - Evaluate the design level of the administration buildings through a detailed study from the historical point of view to know their patterns of development work in a manner that meets the requirements of the age and meet all of its functional needs . Methodology : This study is based on two main approaches , The first approach is a descriptive approach that relates to the historical facts about the establishment of administration buildings , the second approach is analytical approach based on analysis of the design bases of the administration buildings and then draw conclusion and recommendations that designers can benefit from it . Results: - The architectural product achieved by the function and beauty is the final outcomes of the design process, and the novelty is still between the initial giving of the form or the functions( functional activities ) , all this led to the thinking and diversity in the form of spaces for administration buildings and how to contact them . - The social relations in the administration buildings between the working people and the vacuum users are affected by the horizontal plans and nature of the connection of the internal spaces together . - Thinking about raising the efficiency of the administration building by thinking about ways of communication and communication within the spaces of the administration building . - The closed design of the internal spaces in the administration buildings is uncomfortable for the self and works in an atmosphere of monotony and doesn`t achieve good social communication between the staff . | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Design solutions; administration buildings; horizontal extension of the building – vertical extensions of buildings – treatment of the plans – open plans- closed plans- semi closed plans | ||||
| References | ||||
|
- إیمان الجوفی :- ( العلاقات الاجتماعیة النفسیة والوظیفیة وعلاقتها بالأداء الوظیفی) کلیة الآداب جامعة صنعاء. 2- د/عبد الرحیم الشراح -2000 -الهندسة الداخلیة للمکاتب الإداریة – مکتبة زهراء الشرق . 3- زیتون صلاح -1993- ( عمارة القرن العشرین )- مطابع قلیوب التجاریة- القاهرة . 4-حسن نوبى -1997-( التفکیر الأبداعى فى عملیة التصمیم المعمارى ) _ رسالة دکتوراه- قسم عمارة – کلیة الهندسة –جامعة أسیوط . 5- خورى بولا- 1991- نورمان فوستر –( سلسلة مشاهیر الفکر الهندسى المعمارى ) –دار قابس للطباعة والنشر والتوزیع . 6- سامى عرفان-1978 –نظریات العمارة - ( مقرر السنة الأولى لطلبة عمارة ) - طبعة جدیدة لیست للبیع –دار نافع للطباعة والنشر – القاهرة . 7- سامى عرفان- 1976 – نظریات العمارة –(مقرر السنة الثالثة لطلبة عمارة )- طبعة خاصة- دار نافع للطباعة والنشر – القاهره . 8- سامى عرفان – ( عمارة القرن العشرین الجزء الرابع ) – دار نافع للطباعة والنشر – القاهره -1978 . 9- على عبد الرؤف – ( النقد المعمارى ودوره فى تطویر العمارة المصریة المعاصرة – دراسة تحلیلیة ) – رسالة ماجستیر – قسم الهندسة المعماریة –کلیة الهندسة جامعة القاهره . 10- محسن عبد الکریم حسن – 2004- (الأبداع فى التصمیم المعمارى ) – رسالة دکتوراه فى العمارة- کلیة الهندسة –جامعة الأزهر . 11- محمد ماجد خاوصى –المبانى الإداریة –ج 5- (الموسوعة المعماریة الهندسیة )- المطبعة الحدیثه -1998 . 12- محسن عبد الکریم حسن -2004 –المبانى الإداریة –ج 5- (الموسوعة المعماریة الهندسیة )- المطبعة الحدیثه -1998 . 13- محمد رغد مفید -2000- ( النقد والنظریة فى العمارة نحو إطار عمل لنقد نظریات العمارة وقیاس درجة تأییدها )- رسالة دکتوراة – کلیة الهندسة – جامعة القاهره . 14- محمد محمود عویضه -1984- طور الفکر المعمارى فى القرن العشرین – دار النهضة العربیة – بیروت . 15-Alexi Marmot & Jonnaeley : Office space planning – copy 2000.. 16- Allan, Phillips, The Best in office Interior Design, Rotovision, New York 1991. 17- Becker, F. Offices That Work: Balancing Cost, Flexibility, and Communication. New York: Cornell University International Workplace Studies Program (IWSP), 2000. 18-Brennan, A., Chugh, J.S. and Kline, T. Traditional versus open office design: A longitudinal Field Study, Journal of Environment and Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 3, pages 279-299, May 2002. 19-Demarco, T. Slack: Getting past burnout, busywork and the myth of total efficiency. Random House, New York, NY, 2002. 20-Heerwagen, J., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K. and Loftness, V. Building Research & Information, 2004, 32(6): 510-528. 21-Maher, A. and von Hippel, C. Individual Differences in Employee Reactions to Open-Plan Offices, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 5, pages 219-229, 2005. 22-Majchrzak, A. and Wang, Q. Breaking the Functional Mind-Set in Process Organizations, Harvard Business Review, September 1996. 23-Majchrzak,A., Malhotra, A., Stamps, J and Lipnack, J. Can Absence Make a Team Grow Stronger? Harvard Business Review, May 2004. 24-O’Neill, M. Ergonomic Design for Organizational Effectiveness, CRC Press, New York, NY, 1998. 25-O’Neill, M. Measuring Workplace Performance, 2nd Ed. Taylor and Francis, New York, NY., 2007b 26-Santa Raymond and Roger Cunliffe, Tomorrow.s office, London -1997.p 173 27- Schmertz,M.F.,Office Building Design, McGraw-Hill,New York, 1975 Pg 22, 237) Stephen Bailey,The Working Office, CIP Data, London,1979- PP 28 . 28-Veitch, J. Charles, K., Kelly, Farley K. and Newsham, G. A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 3, pages 177-189, 2007. 29-Venezia, C. and Allee, V. Supporting mobile worker networks: components for effective workplaces, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, (9)2, 2007. 30-Wymer, T. A Map for the Emerging Workplace: The Y in the Road, Knoll research white paper, 2008. 31-Vischer, J. C. Workspace Strategies: Environment as a Tool for Work, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1996. 32-Yildirim, K., Akalin-Baskaya, A. and Celebi, M. The effects of window proximity, partition height, and gender on perceptions of open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 2, pages 154-165, 2007 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 991 PDF Download: 4,182 |
||||
