MICRO SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL DENTAL ADHESIVES TO DENTIN USING DIFFERENT ETCHING MODES (IN VITRO STUDY)
Morsy, S., Moustafa, E., Elsharkawy, M. (2020). MICRO SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL DENTAL ADHESIVES TO DENTIN USING DIFFERENT ETCHING MODES (IN VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 45(2), 84-90. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88443
Samaa M. Morsy; El Sayed Moustafa; Mahmoud Elsharkawy. "MICRO SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL DENTAL ADHESIVES TO DENTIN USING DIFFERENT ETCHING MODES (IN VITRO STUDY)". EKB Journal Management System, 45, 2, 2020, 84-90. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88443
Morsy, S., Moustafa, E., Elsharkawy, M. (2020). 'MICRO SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL DENTAL ADHESIVES TO DENTIN USING DIFFERENT ETCHING MODES (IN VITRO STUDY)', EKB Journal Management System, 45(2), pp. 84-90. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88443
Morsy, S., Moustafa, E., Elsharkawy, M. MICRO SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL DENTAL ADHESIVES TO DENTIN USING DIFFERENT ETCHING MODES (IN VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 45(2): 84-90. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88443

MICRO SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF UNIVERSAL DENTAL ADHESIVES TO DENTIN USING DIFFERENT ETCHING MODES (IN VITRO STUDY)

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 14, Volume 45, Issue 2, August 2020, Page 84-90  XML PDF (388.78 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88443
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Samaa M. Morsy email 1; El Sayed Moustafa2; Mahmoud Elsharkawy2
1Bachelor of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
2Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
Introduction:Patient demand for tooth colored restorations have made composites an important part of the restorative process. An important factor affecting the intraoral performance of composite restorations is bonding. Therefore, a strong bond at the tooth-restoration interface is necessary for long-term success of a composite restoration.
Objectives: To compare the micro shear bond strength of a resin composite (Filtek Z250) to dentin using three universal adhesives in self-etching and total-etching modes and perform fractographic analysis using scanning electron microscope.
Materials and methods:60 dentin specimens were used in this study. They were divided into two main groups (self-etch mode & total-etch mode). Each group was subdivided into three subgroups according to the bonding agent used (Tetric N bond universal, All bond universal and Single bond universal). Bonding of adhesives and composite buildups were done according to manufacturer’s instructions. All specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles from 5 to 55°C. The micro shear bond strength was measured using universal testing machine. Specimens were further sectioned, gold sputtered and evaluated fractographically using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data obtained were analyzed using F-test (ANOVA), two-way ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation tests.
Results: In self-etch mode, the micro shear bond strength of the three tested adhesives didn’t show a significant difference. Meanwhile, etching significantly improved the micro shear bond strength of Single bond universal, while Tetric N bond universal and All bond universal showed no significant difference.
Conclusions: An etching step prior to the application of the universal adhesives didn’t significantly affect their micro shear bond strength, except for Single bond universal.
Keywords
Adhesives; dentin; bonding agents; etch mode; micro shear bond strength; fractographic analysis
References
  1. Mandava D, Ajitha P, Narayanan LL. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strengths of total-etch adhesives and self-etch adhesives with single and multiple consecutive applications: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12:55–9.
  2. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: Present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:213–24.
  3. Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azevedo CL, de Carvalho RM, da Julio Singer M, Grande RH. Moisture spectrum of demineralized dentin for adhesive systems with different solvent bases. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:183–92.
  4. Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent. 2015;40:282–92.
  5. Hashimoto M, Nagano F, Endo K, Ohno H. A review: Biodegradation of resin dentin bonds. Jap Dent Sci Rev. 2011;47:5–12.
  6. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Torii Y, Osaka A, et al. Self-etch monomer calcium salt deposition on dentin. J Dent Res. 2011;90:602–6.
  7. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:618–31.
  8. Ozok AR, Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total etch versus an all-in-one adhesive. Dent Mater. 2004;20:479–86.
  9. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014;42:800–7.
  10. Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Oper Dent. 2015;40:55–62.
  11. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Suzuki T, Scheidel DD, Erickson RL. Influence of different preetching times on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124:210–8.
  12. Martinez LIV, Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014;30:1126–35.
  13. Salem-Milani A, Zand V, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, ZakeriMilani P, Banifatemeh A. The effect of protocol for disinfection of extracted teeth recommended by center for disease control (CDC) on micro hardness of enamel and dentin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7:e552–6.
  14. Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, Suryakanth MB. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of dental adhesives -An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e892–6.
  15. Holiel A, Abdel-fattah W. Bonding and Morphological evaluation of a Multi-mode Adhesive resin to enamel and dentin. J Dent Res. 2018;97:1432.
  16. Ahmed AA, Hassan MM, Abdalla AI. Microshear bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin used in total‑etch and self-etch modes. Tanta Dent J. 2018;15:93.
  17. Meerbeek VB, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Ende VA, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:e100–21.
  18. Technical specification ISO/TS 11405. Dental materials - testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Second ed. Switzerland; 2003.
  19. Perdiago J, Lambrechts P, Meerbeek VB, Vanherle G, Lopes AL. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:1111–20.
  20. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016;32:e9–21.
  21. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res. 2012;91:376–81.
  22. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:765–76.
  23. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paterliquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater. 2009;25:459–66.
  24. McDdonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, et al. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin–polymer interfaces. Biomaterials. 2002;23:3603–8.
  25. De Munck J, Meerbeek VB, Yudhira R, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium: YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002; 110:322–9.
  26. Martinez LIV, Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014;30:1126–35.
  27. Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013;41:404–11.
  28. Firat E, Gurgan S, Gutknecht N. Microtensile bond strength of an etch and rinse adhesive to enamel and dentin after Er: YAG laser pretreatment with different pulse durations. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 27:15–21.
  29. Sabatini C. Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013; 21:56–62.
  30. Della Bona A. Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: the relationship of microstructure, composition, properties and fractography. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005; 13:1–9.
  31. Levrini L, Di Benedetto G, Raspanti M. Dental wear: A scanning electron microscope study. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014:340425.
  32. Elkaffas AA, Hamama HH, Mahmoud SH. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor Dent Endod. 2018; 43:e29.
Statistics
Article View: 665
PDF Download: 1,795