SHEAR BOND STRENGTH FOR IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED REPAIR OF COMPOSITE WITH MICROHYBRID AND NANOHYBRID RESINS USING DIFFERENT BONDING AGENTS
Kholief, E., Mahmoud, E., El Chabrawy, S. (2020). SHEAR BOND STRENGTH FOR IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED REPAIR OF COMPOSITE WITH MICROHYBRID AND NANOHYBRID RESINS USING DIFFERENT BONDING AGENTS. EKB Journal Management System, 45(2), 104-110. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88446
Eman A. Kholief; El Sayed M. Mahmoud; Sonia M. El Chabrawy. "SHEAR BOND STRENGTH FOR IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED REPAIR OF COMPOSITE WITH MICROHYBRID AND NANOHYBRID RESINS USING DIFFERENT BONDING AGENTS". EKB Journal Management System, 45, 2, 2020, 104-110. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88446
Kholief, E., Mahmoud, E., El Chabrawy, S. (2020). 'SHEAR BOND STRENGTH FOR IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED REPAIR OF COMPOSITE WITH MICROHYBRID AND NANOHYBRID RESINS USING DIFFERENT BONDING AGENTS', EKB Journal Management System, 45(2), pp. 104-110. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88446
Kholief, E., Mahmoud, E., El Chabrawy, S. SHEAR BOND STRENGTH FOR IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED REPAIR OF COMPOSITE WITH MICROHYBRID AND NANOHYBRID RESINS USING DIFFERENT BONDING AGENTS. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 45(2): 104-110. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88446

SHEAR BOND STRENGTH FOR IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED REPAIR OF COMPOSITE WITH MICROHYBRID AND NANOHYBRID RESINS USING DIFFERENT BONDING AGENTS

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 17, Volume 45, Issue 2, August 2020, Page 104-110  XML PDF (348.11 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.88446
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Eman A. Kholief email 1; El Sayed M. Mahmoud2; Sonia M. El Chabrawy3
1Master student of Operative Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
2Professor of Operative Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
3Professor of Dental Biomaterials, Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
Introduction: Repair is indicated mainly in the event of localized short­comings that are clinically unsatisfactory and no longer acceptable; it implies in any case the addition of a restorative material.



Objectives:Shear bond strength for immediate and delayed repair of composite with microhybrid and nanohybrid resins using different bonding agents.
Materials and methods: One hundred sixty nanohybrid composite discs were prepared. They were divided into 16 groups (10 each) according to 3 factors: Factor 1: Repair time, Factor 2: Repair protocol and Factor 3: Repair composite material. For immediate repair (I), discs (n=80) were divided into 4 subgroups 20 discs each. Each subgroup was divided into 2 groups as follows Group 1 (a): no conditioning with nanohybrid composite, Group 1 (b): no conditioning with microhybrid composite, Group 2 (a) Adhese Universal bond with nanohybrid composite, Group 2 (b) Adhese Universal bond with microhybrid composite, Group 3 (a) All-Bond Universal with Nano-hybrid composite ,Group 3 (b) All-Bond Universal with microhybrid composite, Group 4 (a) Scotchbond™ Universal with nanohybrid composite, and Group 4 (b) Scotchbond™ Universal with microhybrid composite. After 3 months of storage for delayed repair (II), the repair procedures were performed similar to the immediately repaired groups. After 1000 thermal cycles, all specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test.
Results:repair time and surface treatment revealed statistically significant effect on the shear bond strength values of all groups (p ≤ 0.05). Highest shear bond strength value was recorded in group I4b (21.97 ± 1.19) MPa and the lowest value was recorded in group II1a (4.42 ± 0.88 MPa)
Conclusions: Time of repair, bonding agent and repair material affected repair bond strength of composite.
Keywords
Immediate and delayed repair; adhesion; bonding agent; repair bond strength
References
  1. Ástvaldsdóttir Á, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken JW, NaimiAkbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranæus S. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults – A systematic review. J Dent. 2015; 43:934-54.
  2. Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations-- criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:28-50.
  3. Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite after Different Surface, and Bonding Treatments. Materials. 2016; 9:547.
  4. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al. FDI World Dental Federation – clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010; 12:259-72.
  5. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent. 2010; 38:29-38.
  6. Ozcan M, Pekkan G. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex. Oper Dent. 2013; 38:63-72.
  7. Atalay C, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G. Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018; 32:921-30.
  8. Özcan M, Koc-Dundar B. Composite–composite adhesion in dentistry: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014; 28:2209-29.
  9. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:17-28.
  10. Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 2006; 85:941-4.
  11. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res. 2008; 87:757- 61.
  12. El-Askary FS, Salah M, Anwar MN, Özcan M. Immediate and delayed repair bond strength of a new ormocer resin restorative material as a function of mechanical and chemical surface conditioning methods. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017; 31:310-26.
  13. de Jesus Tavarez RR, Almeida Júnior LJDS, Guará TCG, Ribeiro IS, Maia Filho EM, Firoozmand LM. Shear bond strength of different surface treatments in bulk fill, microhybrid, and nanoparticle repair resins. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2017; 9:61-6.
  14. Spyrou M, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Koulaouzidou E, Dionysopoulos P. The reparability of contemporary composite resins. Eur J Dent. 2014; 8:353-9.
  15. Koç-Vural U, Kerimova L, Baltacioglu İH, Kiremitçi A. Bond strength of dental nanocomposites repaired with a bulkfill composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9: e437-42.
  16. Abo El Naga A, Zahran R. The Microshear Bond Strength of Repaired Resin Composite after Different Surface and Bonding Treatments. J Am Sci. 2017; 13:79-86.
  17. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77:122-6.
  18. Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Ritter AV, Swift EJ. Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7:159–64.
  19. Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, Brum RT, Souza EM. Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs. Oper Dent. 2017; 42:367-74.
  20. Eliasson ST, Tibballs J, Dahl JE. Effect of different surface treatments and adhesives on repair bond strength of resin composites after one and 12 months of storage using an improved microtensile test method. Oper Dent. 2014; 39: E206-16.
  21. Tantbirojn D, Fernando C, Versluis A. Failure Strengths of Composite Additions and Repairs. Oper Dent. 2015; 40:364-71.
  22. Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17:601-8.
  23. El-Deeb HA, Ghalab RM, Elsayed Akah MM, Mobarak EH. Repair bond strength of dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials. J Adv Res. 2016; 7:263-9.
  24. El-Askary FS, El-Banna AH, van Noort R. Immediate vs delayed repair bond strength of a nanohybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14:265-74.
  25. Kashi TJ, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, Aghabaigi N, Tabatabaei FS. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent. 2011; 36:608-17.
  26. Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017; 3:21-9.
  27. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J. Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7:41-9.
  28. El namsi NM. Effect of some repair protocols on the repair bond strength to strength to a nanocomposite. Egypt Dent J. 2013; 61:1-9.
  29. Oskoee PA, Kimyai S, Talatahari E, Rikhtegaran S, Pournaghi-Azar F, Oskoee JS. Effect of mechanical surface treatment on the repair bond strength of the silorane-based composite resin. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014; 8:61-6.
  30. Tabatabaei MH, Alizade Y, Taalim S. Effect of various surface treatment on repair strength of composite resin. J Dent (Tehran). 2004; 1:5-11.
  31. Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36:15-26.
  32. Ayar MK, Guven ME, Burduroglu HD, Erdemir F. Repair of aged bulk-fill composite with posterior composite: Effect of different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31:246-52.
  33. Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dent Mater. 2011;27: e20–7.
  34. Özcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, Barbosa SH, Bottino MA. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17:1751-8.
  35. Bociong K, Szczesio A, Sokolowski K, Domarecka M, Sokolowski J, Krasowski M, et al. The influence of water sorption of dental lightcured composites on shrinkage stress. Materials (Basel). 2017; 10:1142.
  36. Sadaghiani M, Rahbar M, Saati K, Kokabi H, Amini S. Comparison of the Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin Restoration in Micro-and Nano-hybrid Composite Resins using Different Interfacial Materials. JRMDS. 2018; 6:436-44.
  37. Nagano D, Nakajima M, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Hosaka K, Sato K, et al. Effect of Water Aging of Adherend Composite on Repair Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composites. J Adhes Dent. 2018; 20:425-33.
  38. Ahmadizenouz G, Esmaeili B, Taghvaei A, Jamali Z, Jafari T, Amiri Daneshvar F, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016; 10:9-16. 
Statistics
Article View: 529
PDF Download: 1,047