استخدام القراءة بالمحاکاة لتحسين الفهم القرائي لدي دارسات اللغة الانجليزية کلغة أجنبية بالمملکة العربية السعودية Shadow-Reading Strategy for Developing Saudi English as a Foreign Language University Students' Reading Comprehension | ||||
| التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 34, 163 جزء5, April 2015, Page 469-494 PDF (391.97 K) | ||||
| Document Type: بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2015.92552 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| منال محمد خضري محمد | ||||
| استاذ المناهج وطرق التدريس المساعد بکلية التربية بالإسماعلية | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| هدفت الدراسة الحالية إلى فحص اثر استخدام القراءة بالمحاکاة في تحسين الفهم القرائي لدي دارسات اللغة الانجليزية کلغة أجنبية بالمملکة العربية السعودية. تمثلت مجموعة الدراسة من طالبات المستوي الثاني بقسم اللغات والترجمة بکلية التربية والآداب بعرعر بجامعة الحدود الشمالية بالمملکة العربية السعودية. بلغ عدد الطالبات بمجموعة الدراسة 40طالبة. أستخدم المنهج شبه التجريبي بتصميم المجموعة الواحدة. تم إجراء اختبار قبلي لمجموعة الدراسة باستخدام اختبار الفهم القرائي القبلي. تم تطبيق التجربة بتدريب مجموعة الدراسة علي استخدام القراءة بالمحاکاة في تحسين الفهم القرائي لديهن. بعد انتهاء التجربة تم إجراء اختبار بعدي لمجموعة الدراسة باستخدام اختبار الفهم القرائي البعدي. تم حساب الفروق بين متوسطي درجات اختبار الفهم القرائي القبلي والبعدى باستخدام اختبار (ت). وتم رصد النتائج وتفسيرها وأظهرت النتائج وجود فروق دالة إحصائيا في متوسط الفروق بين اختبار الفهم القرائي القبلي والبعدى لصالح اختبار الفهم القرائي البعدى. تشير النتائج إلى فاعلية استخدام القراءة بالمحاکاة في تحسين الفهم القرائي لدى طالبات قسم اللغات والترجمة بکلية التربية والآداب بعرعر. تضمن البحث مجموعة من التوصيات والمقترحات لبحوث مستقبلية. This study was designed to examine the effect of using shadow-reading strategy on developing Saudi English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students' reading comprehension. It was a quasi-experimental study which was based on a one group design.The participants were 40 second level Languages and Translation Department at Arar faculty of education and arts, Northern Border University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. They were pre-tested before the treatment by using the Reading Comprehension Test (RCT). They were post-tested after the treatment by using the post-RCT. The researcher taught the participants during the treatment which was based on doing shadow-reading strategy to develop reading comprehension. Difference between the pre-RCT and the post-RCT was calculated by using the t-test. The result showed that a statistically significant difference was found between the pre-RCT and the post-RCT in favor of the post-RCT. The result revealed the effectiveness of using shadow-reading strategy in developing second level students' reading comprehension. Therefore, it can be concluded that shadow-reading strategy helped the participants develop their reading comprehension on the post-RCT. Some recommendations and suggestions for further research were included. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| القراءة بالمحاکاة- الفهم القرائي. Shadow-reading strategy; reading comprehension | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Al-Nafisah, K.(2015). The effectiveness of an extensive reading program in developing Saudi EFL university students’ reading comprehension. Arab World English Journal, 6(2),98-109. http://awej.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=676:khalid-ibrahim-al-nafisah&catid=57&Itemid=167
Alsamadani, H. (2009). The Relationship between Saudi EFL College-Level Students’ Use of Reading Strategies and Their EFL Reading Comprehension. Unpublished dissertation: Ohio University, USA.
Alsamadani, H. (2011). The effects of the 3-2-1 reading strategy on EFL reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 184-191.
Appel, G., &Lantolf, J. (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 texts recall tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 437-452.
Berk, L., &Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington. D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Brown, H. (2014). Principles of language learning & teaching (6th ed.). White Plains, NY:Pearson.Centeno-Cortés.
Buck, G. (2003). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills (3rd Ed.). Chicago: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich publishers.
Chau, J., Wu, W., Chen, J., &Lughmani, Sh. (2012). ESL readers’ comprehension performance: the Chinese secondary context. Oxford ELT Journal, 66(3), 304-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr088Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Commander, M., & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (2013). Reading as a social interactive process: The impact of shadow-reading in L2 classrooms. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 170-191.
Davydov, V. (1997). Introduction to L.S. Vygotsky Educational Psychology. Boca Raton , Fl.: St. Lucie Press.
Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching them to read (6th Ed.). Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
Guerrero, M. C. M. de, & Commander, M. (2013). Shadow-reading: Affordances for imitation in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 433-453.
Huggins, G., & Edwards, R. (2011). Scaffolding to improve reading comprehension and to write scholarly research sciences. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 1(16), 30-36.
Huong, L. (2003). The meditational role of language teachers in sociocultural theory. English Teaching Forum, 14(3),31-35.
Hurley S., &Chater N. (2005). Introduction. In Hurley S., Chater N. (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: Volume 2: From neuroscience to social science: Imitation, human development, and culture (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kozulin, A. (2004). Vygotsky’s theory in the classroom: Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIX(1), 3-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173233
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J., &Poehner, M. (2008). Introduction to sociocultural theory and the teaching of second language. In P. J. Lantolf, & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second language (pp. 1-30). London: Equinox.
Levine, A., Ferenzo, O., &Reves, T. (2000). EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers? TESLEJ, 4(4), 75-91.
Murphey, T. (2000). Shadowing and summarizing (NFLRC Video #11). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. http://www.divx.com/en/products/software/windows/divx
Murphey, T. (2001). Exploring conversational shadowing. Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 128-155.
Nakanishi, T.,& Ueda, A. (2011). Extensive reading and the effect of shadowing. Reading in a Foreign Language. 23(1), 1-16.
Ogle, D., & Correa-Kovtun, A. (2010). Supporting English-language learners and struggling readers in content literacy with the “Partner Reading and Content, Too” routine. The Reading Teacher, 63(7), 532-542.
Ou, F. (2006). The effects of the summarization strategy on reading comprehension of non-proficient Taiwanese university English as a Foreign Language Learners. The Faculty of Graduate School, University of Kansas. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 82-83.
Pani, S. (2004). Reading strategy instruction through mental modeling. ELT Journal, 58(4), 355-362.
Remi, A., & Lawrence, W. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423340
Reza, Gh., &Mahmood, D. (2012). Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context. International Journal of Research studies in Language Learning, 2(3), 67-80.
Roebuck, R. (1998). Reading and Recall in L1 and L2: a Sociocultural Approach. Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Saito, Y., Nagasawa, Y., & Ishikawa, S. (2011). Effective instruction of shadowing using a movie. In A. Stewart (Ed.), JALT2010 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding. Pittsburg: Rand Education.
Stern, H. (1970). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tamai, K. (2005). Strategic effect of shadowing on listening ability. In J. White (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on foreign language education and technology (FLEAT IV). Association for Language Education and Technology (pp. 620 – 625). Kobe: Japan.
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices. Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Toda, T., & Liu, J. (2007). Basic research forth establishment of a shadowing course. Japanese language education methods, 14(1), 8-9.
Van den Broek, P., &Espin, C. (2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment:Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School Psychology Review, 41(3), 315-325.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1996). Anthology of humanistic pedagogy. Moskva: SmyslVygotsky, L.S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
Wiltshier, J. (2007). Fluency through shadowing–What, why, and how? In K. Bradford-Watts (Ed.), JALT2006 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oralreading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(3), 4-12.
Zakeri, E. (2014). The effect of shadowing on EFL learners’ oral performance in terms of fluency. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 21-26.
Zhang, L. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge aboutEFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 320-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352
Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two Parallel SLSworlds?. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 35- 58. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264510
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 204 PDF Download: 216 |
||||
