Rare Mule Dinar in the Name of the Abbasid Caliph al-Qahir bi-llah Minted in Sana’a in 314 A.H. | ||||
مجلة مرکز المسکوکات الإسلامية - مصر | ||||
Article 11, Volume 2, Issue 2, 2019, Page 5-14 PDF (894.78 K) | ||||
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jince.002.11 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Author | ||||
Eman Mahmoud Arafa | ||||
Faculty of Archeology, Cairo University- Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Abstract: Since the fourth century A.H., Yemen has become virtually independent of Baghdad. It slipped out of the Abbasid control into the hands of local rulers. One of these rulers was a member of the Yufirids ‘Banu Yu’fir’, that held power between 225 AH / 839 AD till 393 AH / 972 AD and whose center of power was Sana’a. Coinciding with a part of that period, the caliphate in Baghdad was under the power of caliph al-Qahir bi’llah (320-322 AH / 932-943 AD). This research presents a study of a rare dinar which represents a specimen that holds the date of minting that dates back to the Abbasid caliph al-Muqtadir but under the name of al-Qahir. Therefore, this specimen is considered as a mule dinar. الملخص: منذ القرن الرابع الهجري، بدأت اليمن بالاستقلال عن سيطرة الخلافة العباسية في بغداد، حيث خرجت عن السيطرة العباسية، لتصبح في أيدي الحکام المحليين، أحد هؤلاء الحکام کان من جماعة "بنو يعفر"، التي تولت السلطة بين 225هـ/ 839م حتى 393هـ/ 972م والتي کان مرکز سلطتها صنعاء، ويتزامن مع جزء من تلک الفترة، فترة حکم الخليفة القاهر بالله (320-322 هـ/ 932-943 م) في بغداد، ويقدم هذا البحث دراسة لدينار نادر يحمل تاريخ سک يعود الى عهد الخليفة العباسي المقتدر بالله بينما يحمل اسم الخليفة العباسي القاهر بالله، لذلک، يعتبر هذا الدينار بمثابة دينار هجين. | ||||
Highlights | ||||
The specimen under study combines an obverse and a reverse from two distinct and distinguishable series of dinars with al-Qahir’s name on the field of the reverse and the date 314 AH that dates back to al-Muqtadir’s period on the marginal inscriptions of the obverse, forming one unique mule. Due to this unique combination in form, it is considered as one of the mule coins prototypes that were struck as a result of an incorrect combination of a new die with another one that had erroneously remained in use. Thus, it might have been accidentally minted by a confused mint employee. Another possible hypothesis to be put into consideration is that this dinar was minted in two different dies intentionally. These unofficial mules are very common and teach us nothing about the chronology of the official coinage. As for comparing the dinar under study (PI.2), with the other two dinars of both al-Qahir bi-llah (PI.1) and al-Muqtadir bi-llah (PI.3), in terms of size and weight, they are found to be in the same average measures. Besides, the Kufic script used in the inscriptions of the specimen under study is remarkably sophisticated which distinguished the coins of this era. However, regarding the date of mint, by comparing the date of the dinar under study (PI.2), with the dinar of al- Muqtadir bi-llah (PI.3), it is obvious that the date of mint (FIG.1) on the specimen under study is typically the same as the date of the dinar of al-Muqtadir bi-llah (FIG.2), as the last word of the date in hundreds came incomplete as “thuluth”, unlike the way it was struck on al-Qahir’s coins as it came complete as “thultheen”. Therefore, it is conclusive evidence that the mule dinar was undoubtedly struck from two separate and distinct dies. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Mule Dinar Al; Qahir bi’llah Al; Muqtadir bi’llah Sana’a Dies. دينار هجين القاهر بالله المقتدر بالله صنعاء قالب ضرب | ||||
References | ||||
Bibliography;
| ||||
Statistics Article View: 141 PDF Download: 214 |
||||