EFFECT OF OPEN WOUND CARE PROTOCOL ON NURSES’ KNOWLEDGE AND PATIENTS WOUND HEALING | ||||
Port Said Scientific Journal of Nursing | ||||
Article 3, Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2020, Page 133-146 PDF (896.21 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/pssjn.2020.95717 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Manal Tharwat AbouZaid* 1; Labiba Abd El-Kader Mohamed2; Mossad Mahmud Morshed3; Eman Saleh Shahin4; Amal Bakr Abo-El-Ata4 | ||||
1Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University | ||||
2Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Caire University | ||||
3Surgery, Faculty of Medicine - Mansoura University | ||||
4Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty Of Nursing – Port Said Universityegypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background:Surgical wounds are of the most devastating injuries. They produce a dramatic change in the patient’s life. Nurses are the key persons in directing successful rehabilitation effort to assure patients attain functional capabilities, avoid further disabilities, and prevent complications. Aim:to assess nurses' knowledge regardingopen wound care in the surgical unit, evaluate the effect of a wound care protocol on nurses' knowledge in the surgical unit, and assess patients' wound healing pre- and post-applying wound care protocol in surgical units at Mansoura University and emergency hospitals. Subject and methods: A descriptive exploratory research study were carried out. Study sample:includes two groups first group, consisted of 55nurses from the two hospitals, second group consist 53 adult patients with openwounds, Data collection was accomplished utilizing three tools; Astructured interview for the nurses, wound care observational checklist,Bates-Jensen, Data was collected from both nurses and patients three times; one time before implementing the wound care protocol, and a second time after its implementationthiredthird time after 12 weeks follow up. The result of this study revealed a statistically significant improvement in nurses' knowledge after implementing wound care protocol (P-value = 0.014 and 0.000 respectively). Additionally, wound degeneration decreased in post-protocol implementation and during follow-up. The wound regeneration significantly improved (P-value = 0.000) after implementing the wound care protocol. Conclusion: the study concluded the presence of an improvement in nurses'knowledge after implementing the wound care protocol. Also, the wound healing improved significantly. Recommendations: nurses’ knowledge about surgical wound care and infection control in general needs to be updated, through in-service training programs. The hospital should have policies regarding infection control measures, to be reviewed periodically. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Open Surgical Wounds; Patients; Knowledge; Wound Regeneration; Wound Degeneration; and Assess; Complications; Bates-Jensen | ||||
References | ||||
Allen D.B., Maguire J.J., Mahdavian M., Wicke C., Marcocci L., and Scheuenstuhl H. (2013). Wound Hypoxia and Acidosis Limit Neutrophil Bacterial Killing Mechanisms. Arch Surg; 132: 991-996Australian Medicines Handbook (Internet) (2015). Monitoring pressure ulcer healing in persons with disabilities. RehabilNurs; 30(3):92-9.Bates-Jensen BM. (2011).The pressure sore status tool: a few thousand assessments later. Adv Wound Care. 10:65-73Bonham M.A. (2014).Report of the task force on the implications for darkly pigmented intact skin in the prevention of pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care; 8:34-35Canadian Association of Wound Care (2014): Evaluation of Blunt Suture Needles in Preventing Percutaneous Injuries Among Health-Care Workers during Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, New York City, March 2014-June 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 46(2): 25-9.Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC (2010). National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 2000-April 2001, issued May 2001. Am J Infect Control; 25: 477-487Chicano S.G., Drolshagen C. (2015). Reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2015; 36:45-50.Chou & Conifer (2012).Post surgical Infections Associated with Nonsterile Implantable Devices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 41(15): 263.Falanga M.S. (2015): Is Eliminating Flash Sterilization Practical? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 14(8): 479-80.Johnny et al. (2014). A prospective evaluation of emergency department bedside ultrasonography for the detectionof acute cholecystitis. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;pp 115-121.
Lazarus W.T., Talbot T.L., Norton J.A. (2016). Preoperative or postoperative doxorubicin hydrochloride (Adriamycin): which is better for wound healing? Surgery 100:9-13 [Pub Med],McDermott-Scales et al. 2014).Acute calculous cholecystitis. NEngl JMed.;358:2804-2811.
Nichols R.L. (2014). The Operating Room. In: Bennett J.V., and Brachman P.S. (Eds.): Hospital Infections. 3rd ed., Boston: Little, Brown and Co. pp. 461-73. O’Brien et al. (2016).diagnosis of bile duct calculi. Results of a prospective study of 222 cases of choledocholithiasis. Ultrachall Med;8: pp 116.243
Schultz et al. (2013). Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook fornurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US. pp 121-130 | ||||
Statistics Article View: 285 PDF Download: 468 |
||||