DEVELOPMENT OF THE MECHANICAL CULTIVATION-OPERATION FOR SUGAR-BEET CROP | ||||
Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
Article 24, Volume 34, Issue 4, October 2017, Page 1949-1970 PDF (944.64 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2017.96235 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Y. A. El-Hini1; I. Yehia2; A. M. El-Lithy3; A. Faisal4 | ||||
1Prof. of Ag. Eng., Fac. of Eng., Assuit Univ., Egypt. | ||||
2Prof. and Head of Mech. Sys. of Ag. Mechanization, Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
3Prof. of Ag. Eng., Fac. of Ag. Eng., Al-Azhar Univ., Assuit, Egypt. | ||||
4Eng., Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
The aim of this study is to develop the mechanical inter-row cultivation operation for sugar-beet crop at big-scale projects. The investigated parameters were inter-row cultivator forward speed (4, 5, 6 and 7 km/h), number of shares (1, 2, 3) and weed intensity (without, low “< 20 weed/m2”, moderate “20 - 30 weed/m2”, high “30 - 40 weed/m2”, and very high “> 40 weed/m2”). The main results were:The maximum cultivation-efficiency of 100 % was obtained using forward speed of 4 km/h, number of shares of 3 and at low weed intensity (< 20 weed/m2). Meanwhile, the minimum cultivation-efficiency of 58.7 % was obtained using forward speed of 7 km/h, number of shares of 1 and at very high weed intensity (> 40 weed/m2). The maximum sugar-beet root yield of 35.5 ton/fed was obtained using forward speed of 4 km/h, number of shares of 3 and without weed. Meanwhile, the minimum sugar-beet root yield of 22.39 ton/fed was obtained using forward speed of 7 km/h, number of shares of 1 and at very high weed intensity (> 40 weed/m2). | ||||
References | ||||
Bulletin of Estimates Agricultural Income, 2015, The 25th, Economic Affair Sector, Arab Republic of Egypt, Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation.
Ghersa, C.,. Benech-Arnold, R. L, Satorre, E. H. and Martinez-Ghersa. M. A., 2000, Advances in weed management strategies, Field Crops Research, 67 (2): 95- 104.
Gianessi, L. P., and Reigner. N. P., 2007, The value of herbicides in U.S. crop production, Weed Technology 21 (2): 559-566.
Hunt, D., 1983, Farm power and machinery management, 8th Ed. Iowa state Univ., Press Ames, USA. Ames, Iowa, USA: 364-368. Tekade, M. and Dhaliwal, I. S., 2007, Performance of power operated rotary weeder in sugarcane and maize, Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, 44 (3): 230-233.
Weerasooriya, G. V., Jayatissa1, D. N. and Rambanda, M., 2016, Practical field test on newly designed burial type lowland power cultivator for effective weed control in North-Central Province of Sri Lanka, Tropical Agricultural Research, 28 (1): 107 – 114 .
Weide, R. Y., Bleeker, P. O., Achten, V. T., Lotz, L. A., Fogelberg, F. and Melander, B., 2008, Innovation in mechanical weed control in crop rows, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00629.x., Weed Research 48 (3): 215-224. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 119 PDF Download: 248 |
||||