DATE PALM LEAVES DISINTEGRATION USING DRUM CHIPPER MACHINE | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 34, Issue 1, January 2017, Page 53-64 PDF (867.63 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2017.96879 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Z. E. Ismail,1; M. I. Ghazy2 | ||||
| 1Prof. of Power Technology and Machinery, Agric. Eng. Dept., fac. of Agric., Mansoura Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Literature of Agric. Eng., Agric. Eng. Dept., fac. of Agric., Mansoura Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The drum chipper prototype investigated as a tray for chipping the date palm leaves and to solve the residues problem according to pruning palm tree. Because of there are about 1.5 thousand trees scattering in the green garden areas at Mansoura University. It mean that about 45±7.83Mg per year of leaves residues must be take advantage of them by converting to benefit material (such as pellet bedding, livestock bedding, composter, or etc….) and on the other hand, to get rid of pests and rodents that live in them. The outdoor experiments conducted on the available chipper machine under five PTO revolution convert to relative five feeding and chipping drum speeds. The results indicated that, if need a homogeneous samples with pieces lengths from 5.0 to 22mm it is attributed to moving the chipping drum at 1961.40rpm (2717.5m/s). And if want to get out samples with pieces width ranged from 1.0 to 7.0mm must regulate the machine to chipping at drum revolution of 2194.90rpm (3101.4m/s) Also, if require to get the pieces with thickness ranged from 2.0-3.0mm must adjust the chipping drum revolution at 877.96rpm (1240.6m/s). Following the previous instructions lead to reduction chipping drum speeds, which would lead to conservation energy. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| palm leaves - drum speed - chip length - chipper machine - chipper productivity; feeding speed | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Alessio Facello and Eugenio Cavallo (2014). Some parameters that affect the wood chipping machines efficiency. International Conference of Agricultural Eng., CNR - IMAMOTER, Strada delle Cacce 73, Torino – Italy.
Goldstein N. and L. Diaz (2005). Size reduction equipment review. BioCycle 46: 41–48.
Ismail Z .E. and M. M. Abou Habaga (2008). Theoretical approach to determine the share dimensions of uproot palm date. Misr. J. Ag. Eng., 25(3): 746-757. Ismail Z. E. and M. I. Ghazy (2016). Influence of drum chipper setting on the wood chips performance. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 33 (4): 1293 – 1312.
Kärhä K. (2011). Industrial supply chains and production machinery of forest chips in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy 35: 3404–3413. Krajnc M. and Dolšak, B. (2014). The influence of drum chipper configuration on the quality of wood chips. Biomass and Bioenergy, 64, 133-139. Pottie M. and D. Guimier (1985). Preparation of forest biomass for optimal conversion. FERIC Special Report SR-32. Pointe Claire, Canada. 112 p. Spinelli R. and B. R. Hartsough (2001). A survey of Italian chipping perations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 21, 433-444.
Spinelli R., N. Magagnotti, G. Paletto and C. Preti (2011). Determining the impact of some wood characteristics on the performance of a mobile chipper. Silva Fennica 45: 85–95
Wegener J. and T. Wegener (2012). The principles of helical chipping – observations based on the construction and use of different prototypes. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. [Accepted for publication]. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 165 PDF Download: 214 |
||||
