COMMON BEAN GROWTH, WATER USE EFFICIENCY AND SOIL SALINITY AS EFFECT TO DEFICIT IRRIGATION AND MULCHING MATERIALS UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 14, Volume 34, Issue 1, January 2017, Page 241-258 PDF (695.02 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2017.97084 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| M. Abd El-Wahed1; G. A. Baker2; M. M. Ali; Fatma A. Abd El- Fattah1 | ||||
| 1Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| This study investigated the combined effects of deficit irrigation and mulches on beans yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and soil salinity under drip irrigation. The treatments of the study comprised different combinations of three irrigation treatments (I100% =100%, I85% =85% and I70% = 70% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and three mulching materials (no mulch (NM), rice straw mulch (RSM) and farmyard manure mulch (FYM). The results obtained that the irrigation treatments and mulching materials on yield and WUE were significant. The greatest value of bean yield (941.5and 925.7kg fed-1) were obtained under (I100%) in the first and second season, respectively, while the lowest ones (706.4 and 710.6kg fed-1) were obtained from (I70%) in the first and second season, respectively. 39.6 and 11.1 % than NM and RSM in 2014 seasons, respectively increased the average GY of FYM treatment. The corresponding values in 2015 season were 39.6 and 9.3 % in the same order. The average ofsoil salinity value (I70%) was increased by 28.26and 13.50% than those of I100% and I85%, respectively. 21.9 and 19.7 % than those of FYM and RSM treatments, respectively increased the average EC value of NM. The greatest WUE (0.74 and 0.75 kg m−3) value was obtained under I70% compared to (0.69 and 0.68 kg m−3) under I100%, in two seasons, respectively. 40.3 and 10.6 % than those of NM and RSM, respectively increased the average WUE values of FYM. It could be considered as a suitable under environmental conditions of study area and similar areas, the treatment (I100 × FYM) is the most suitable for producing high bean crop yield. Under limited irrigation water supply, application of (I85 ×FYM) treatment was found to be favorable to save 15% of the applied irrigation water, with reduction in bean crop yield. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Drip irrigation; mulch; WUE; bean crop; soil salinity | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abd El-Mageed, T. A., Semida, W. M. and Abd El-Wahed, M. H., 2016.Effect of mulching on plant water status, soil salinity and yield of squash under summer-fall deficit irrigation in salt affected soil. Agric. Water Manage. 173:1–12.
Abou El-Magd, M.M., Zaki, M.F. and Abou-Hussein, S.D., 2008.Effect of organic manure and different levels of saline irrigation water on growth, green yield and chemical content of sweet fennel. Aust. J. Bas. App. Sci, 2, pp.1-90.
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998.Crop evapotranspiration.In:Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO, Rome.
Chattopadhyaya, N. and Mukherjee, D., 1990. Effect of mulching on the changes in the microbial population in soil and nodulation of lentil (Lens culinarisMedik CV B-77).Environment and Ecology, 8(1B), pp.435-437.
Dabney, S.M., Delgado, J.A. and Reeves, D.W., 2001. Using winter cover crops to improve soil and water quality. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32(7-8), pp.1221-1250.
Doorenbos, J. and W.O. Pruitt. 1992. Crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage.Paper, No. 24, FAO, Rome, 144 pp.
FAO. 2013. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics. FAO Statistics Division 2014 / 21 May 2014.
Fereres, E. and Soriano, M.A., 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use.Journal of experimental botany, 58(2), pp.147-159.
FerrerTalón, P.J., VillalbaBuendía, D., GarcíaTarín, A., 2004. Efectos en el cultivo de los cítricosdelacolchado del suelo con plástico negro. FruticulturaprofesionalEnero/Febrero.
Geerts, S., and Raes, D., 2009. Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric. Water Manage. 96, 1275-1284.
Hartkamp, A.D., White, J.W., Rossing, W.A.H., Van Ittersum, M.K., Bakker, E.J. and Rabbinge, R., 2004. Regional application of a cropping systems simulation model: crop residue retention in maize production systems of Jalisco, Mexico. Agricultural systems, 82(2), pp.117-138.
Igbadun, H.E., Ramalan, A.A. and Oiganji, E., 2012. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation and mulch on yield, water use and crop water productivity of onion in Samaru, Nigeria. Agricultural water management, 109, pp.162-169.
Jensen, M.E., 1983. Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. ASAE, Michigan, USA. pp. 827.
Kang, S., Shi, W. and Zhang, J., 2000. An improved water-use efficiency for maize grown under regulated deficit irrigation. Field crops research, 67(3), pp.207-214.
Karlberg, L., Rockström, J., Annandale, J.G. and Steyn, J.M., 2007. Low-cost drip irrigation—A suitable technology for southern Africa?: An example with tomatoes using saline irrigation water. Agricultural Water Management, 89(1), pp.59-70.
Liang, X., Liakos, V., Wendroth, O. and Vellidis, G., 2016. Scheduling irrigation using an approach based on the van Genuchten model. Agricultural Water Management, 176, pp.170-179.
LIU, M.X., Yang, J.S., Li, X.M., Mei, Y.U. and Jin, W.A.N.G., 2012. Effects of irrigation water quality and drip tape arrangement on soil salinity, soil moisture distribution, and cotton yield (Gossypiumhirsutum L.) under mulched drip irrigation in Xinjiang, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11(3), pp.502-511.
Liu, Y., Yan, S., Li, S., Chen, X., Chen, F., 2010. Growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.:) in response to different field water management practices: resource captures and uses efficiency. Agric. Meteorol. 150, 606–613 Melgarejo, P., Martínez, J., Martínez, J.J., Martínez Valero, R. and Amorós, A., 1998. Estudio de la capacidad de enraizamiento de once clones de granado (Punicagranatum L.), utilizando la técnica de acolchadodelsuelo. In I Symposium Internacionalsobre el granado.Orihuela (Alicante).
Mukherjee, A., Sarkar, S. and Chakraborty, P.K., 2012. Marginal analysis of water productivity function of tomato crop grown under different irrigation regimes and mulch managements. Agricultural Water Management, 104, pp.121-127.
Nangare, D.D., Singh, Y., Kumar, P.S. and Minhas, P.S., 2016. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.) as affected by deficit irrigation regulated on phenological basis. Agricultural Water Management, 171, pp.73-79.
Ramalan, A.A., Nega, H. and Oyebode, M.A., 2010. Effect of deficit irrigation and mulch on water use and yield of drip irrigated onions.WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ, 134, pp.39-50.
Ramirez Builes, V.H., Porch, T.G., Harmsen, E.W., 2011. Genotypic differences inwater use efficiency of common bean under drought stress. Agron. J. 103 (4),1206–1215.
Saleh, A.L., Abd El-Kader, A.A. and Hegab, S.A.M., 2003. Response of onion to organic fertilizer under irrigation with saline water. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci, 18(12), pp.707-716.
Semida, W.M., Abd El-Mageed, T.A., Howladar, S.M., 2014. A novel organo-mineral fertilizer can alleviate negative effects of salinity stress for eggplant production on reclaimed saline calcareous soil. ActaHortic. 1034, 493–499 Shahrokhnia, M.H. and Sepaskhah, A.R., 2016. Effects of irrigation strategies, planting methods and nitrogen fertilization on yield, water and nitrogen efficiencies of safflower.Agricultural Water Management, 172, pp.18-30.
Snedecor, C.W. and W.C. Cochran. 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th Ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.
Topak, R., Acar, B., Uyanöz, R. and Ceyhan, E., 2016. Performance of partial root-zone drip irrigation for sugar beet production in a semi-arid area. Agricultural Water Management, 176, pp.180-190. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 139 PDF Download: 216 |
||||
