IMPROVING WATER PRODUCTIVITY OF BEANS THROUGH DOUBLE RIDGE FURROW IRRIGATION METHOD | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 12, Volume 33, Issue 4, October 2016, Page 1387-1398 PDF (435.75 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2016.97610 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| A. H. Elmetwalli1; M. M. Ibrahim2 | ||||
| 1Assoc. Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Tanta Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Lecturer, Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Al-Mansoura Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Food security and water resources are in danger as a result of water scarcity and there is a need to produce more crop yields with less water. Consequently, adopting new efficient irrigation methods is crucially important to sustain population growth. This study compared the effects of applying two different surface irrigation methods (traditional furrow and double ridge furrow irrigation methods) on yield, water productivity of dry beans in sandy loam soils taking two irrigation intervals into consideration. Different irrigation treatments were compared in terms of beneficial water use and economical water productivity for the two irrigation methods. Comparing the results obtained from different treatments, the double ridge furrow method is advantageous in comparison with traditional furrow irrigation in terms of water saving. It was obvious that double ridge furrow method can at least save 40-50% of water which can directly expand the cultivated area in the Nile Delta and Valley. As a result of saving water, beans water productivity increased by 41 and 34% over the traditional furrow method. The results therefore showed that double ridge furrow method can be a robust irrigation method to increase water productivity by applying less irrigation water while having higher yields. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| improving; surface; double; ridge; furrow; irrigation; water; productivity and costs | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Craciun, I. and Craciun, M. (1999). Water and nitrogen use efficiency under limited water supply for maize to increase land productivity. In: Kirda, C. Moutonnet, P., Hera, C. and Nielsen, D.R. (Eds), Crop yield response to deficit irrigation. Kluwer Academic Publisher, the Netherlands, pp. 87-94.
Efetha, A.; Harms, T. and M. Bandara (2011). Irrigation management practices for maximizing seed yield and water use efficiency of Othello dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in southern Alberta, Canada. Irri. Sci., 29: 103-113.
Geerts, S. and D. Raes (2009). Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric. Water Manag., 96: 1275-1284.
Humpherys, A.S. (1978). Improving farm irrigation systems by automation. In: Proceeding of the international commission on Irrigation and Drainage, 10th Congress, Athens, Greece, pp. 35.
Hunsaker, D.J.; A.J. Clemmens and Fangmeier, D.D. (1998). Cotton response to high frequency surface irrigation. Agric. Water Mang., 37: 55-74.
Kang, S. Z.; P. Shi; Y.H. Pan; Z.S. Liang; X.T. Hu and J. Zhang (2000). Soil water distribution, uniformity and water use efficiency under alternate furrow irrigation in arid areas. Irri. Sci., 19: 181-190.
Okwany, R. O.; Peters, T. R.; Ringer, K. L.; Walsh, D. B. and Rubio, M. (2012). Impact of sustained deficit irrigation on spearmint (Mentha spcata L.) biomass production, oil yield and oil quality. Irri. Sci. 30: 213-219.
Rodrigues, G.C. and Pereira, L.S. (2009). Assessing economic impacts of deficit irrigation as related to water productivity and water costs. Biosystems Eng., 103: 536-551.
Sezen, S.M. Yazar, A.; Kapur, B. and Tekin, S. (2011). Comparison of drip and sprinkler irrigation stratigies on sunflower seed and oil yield and quality under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Agric. Water mang., 98: 1153-1161.
Sidhu, A.S.; Mahal, S.S.; Mahey, R.K. and Kumar, K. (2008). Root density, water use efficiency, harvest index and seed yield of hybrid canola (Brassica napus) as influenced by different irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels. Environ. Ecol., 26 (1A): 261-265.
Thind, H. S.; Buttar, G. S. and Aujla (2010). Yield and water use efficiency of wheat and cotton under alternate furrow and check basin irrigation with canal and tube well water in Punjab, India. Irri. Sci. 28: 489-496.
Unlu, M.; R. Kanber; S. Onder; M. Sezen; K. Diker; B. Ozekici and M. Oylu (2007). Cotton yields under different furrow irrigation management techniques in the southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) area, Turkey. Irri. Sci., 26: 35-48.
Weber, H.A.; C.A. Madramootoo; M. Bourgault; M.G. Horst; G. Stulina and D.L. Smith (2006). Water use efficiency of common bean and green gram grown using alternate furrow and deficit irrigation. Agric. Water Mang., 86: 259-268. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 128 PDF Download: 200 |
||||
