DRIP IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT FOR WHEAT PRODUCTION IN SANDY SOIL USING NUCLEAR TECHNIQUE UNDER SALINITY CONDITIONS | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 33, Issue 3, July 2016, Page 849-868 PDF (1.08 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2016.97737 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| S. K. El-Tohory1; M. F. Kassab1; A. M. El-Gindy2; K. F. EL-Bagoury2 | ||||
| 1Soil and Water Research Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| A field experiment was conducted in the experimental farm of Soil and Water Research Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority. Soil mulching and drip irrigation system are strategies for saving irrigation water. This trail was carried out during 2014/2015 winter season in Egypt to evaluate the effects of soil mulching and drip irrigation system on combating salinity and in the same time improving the yield and water-use efficiency by grown wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) cv Masr 2 variety in sandy soil. Treatments of water salinity, i.e. fresh water F (0.5 ds m-1), S1 (6 dSm-1) and S2 (8 dS m-1) were applied under mulching (rice straw) or non-mulching soil. Each treatment was irrigated twice a week using a total amount of 440 mm during the growing season. Volumetric water content was measured using the neutron scattering technique to detect the soil wettability during the growing season. In general, wheat yield for non-mulched treatment irrigated by fresh water was (9.43Ardab.fad-1)or 3366 Kg.ha-1 higher than the mulched one irrigated with fresh water (9.04Ardab.fad-1) or 3227 Kg.ha-1 and also, it was higher than both mulched and non-mulched treatments irrigated with saline water of 6 and 8 dS.m-1. Under saline irrigation, the wheat yield and water use efficiency of mulched treatments were higher than the non-mulched ones for both 6 and 8 dS.m-1. In non-mulched conditions, the treatment irrigated by 6 dS.m-1 recorded a higher production (6.75Ardab.fad-1) or 2411 Kg.ha-1 than the one irrigated by 8 dS.m-1 (6.25 Ardab.fad-1) or 2231 Kg.ha-1 in the same sequence mulched treatment irrigated by 6 dS.m-1 recorded a higher production (8.22 Ardab.fad-1) or 2936 Kg.ha-1 than the mulched one irrigated by 8 dS.m-1 (7.1 Ardab.fad-1) or 2573 Kg.ha-1. The above results indicated that surface mulching could improve the growth and yield of wheat especially under saline irrigation by reducing soil evaporation which sustains soil wetness that enhances the wheat ability to combat salinity stress. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Mulching; Drip irrigation; salinity; wheat; Water use efficiency; Neutron scattering | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Ali, M.; L. Ali; M. Sattar and M. A. Ali (2010). Improvement in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield by Manipulating Seed Rate and Row Spacing in Vehari Zone. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 20(4): 225-230.
Allen, R. G.; L. S. Pereira; D. Raes and M. Smth (2006).Crop Evapotranspiration, guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Aragüés, R. and E. Teresa (2014). Effectiveness of inorganic and organic mulching for soil salinity and sodicity control in a grape vine orchard drip-irrigated with moderately saline waters. Instituto Nacional de Investigación Tecnología Agraria Alimentaria (INIA). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(2): 501-508.
Carter, M. R. and E. G. Gregorich (2008). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. (2nd ed.), CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL, p. 1224.
Dayyoub, A.; A. Hamdy; N. Katerji and M. Mastrorilli (2007). Water saving potentialities through the use of saline water and the application of deficit irrigation. CIHEAM,Options Méditerranéennes: Série B. Etudes et Recherches; No. 56 Vol. II: 45- 59.
Doorenbos, J. and A. H. Kassam (1979). Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, FAO, Rome, Italy.
Dordipour, I.; H. Ghadiri; M. Bybordi; H. Siadat; M. J. Malakouti and J. Hussein (2004). The Use of Saline Water from the Caspian Sea for Irrigation and Barley Production in Northern Iran . International Soil Conservation Organization Conference – Brisbane. Paper No. 986.
El-Shabrawi, H. M.; B. A. Bakry; M. A. Ahmed and M. A. El-Lail (2015). Humic and Oxalic Acid Stimulates Grain Yield and Induces Accumulation of Plastidial Carbohydrate Metabolism Enzymes in Wheat Grown under Sandy Soil Conditions. Agricultural Sciences, 6: 175-185.
FAO (2012). Country Programming Framework (CPF) Government of Egypt 2012-2017.
Gaber, A. M. (2000). Water consumptive use, water use efficiency and production of some Wheat varieties. Egypt .J. Sci., 40 (4): 545-556.
Hamdy, A. (2005). The use of non-conventional water resources. Options Méditerranéennes, Séries A n. 66, Proceedings of the international Workshop Alger, Algeria.
IAEA (2008). Field estimation of soil water content: practical guide to methods, Instrumentation and Sensor Technology. Training course series 30 Vienna.
Kang, S.; L. Zhang; Y. Liang and H. Cai (2002). Effects of Limited Irrigation on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat on the Loess Plateau of China. ACIAR Monograph No. 84, 105–116.
Mansour, H. A.; M. E. El-Hagarey; A. Saad; A. A. A. Ibrahim and V. F. Bralts (2015). Management of Sprinkler Irrigation System and Different Egyptian Wheat Varieties for Uniformity, Yield and Water Productivity.European Journal of Academic Essays, 2(6): 1-6.
Merriam, J. L. and J. Keller (1978). Farm Irrigation System Evaluation: a guide for management. UTAH State University. Logan, Utah, USA.
Mojid, M. A.; K. F. I. Murad; S. S. Tabriz and G. C. L. Wyseure (2013). An advantageous level of irrigation water salinity for wheat cultivation. J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 11(1): 141–146.
Sarwar, M. A.; N. Akbar; H. M. R. Javeed; M. A. Shehzad; A. Mehmood and H. T. Abbas (2013). Response of Zero Tilled Wheat Crop to Different Mulching Techniques in a Semiarid Environment. International Journal of Advanced Research., 1, Issue.9:768-776.
Shenkut, A.; K. Tesfaye; F. Abegaz and T. Hordofa (2013). Determination of Water Requirement and Crop Coefficient for Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) at Melkassa, Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences, 7 (1): 41-50.
Yamanaka, T.; M. Inoue and I. Kaihotsu (2004). Effects of gravel mulch on water vapor transfer above and below the soil surface. Agric. Water Manage.67:145-155.
Yazar, A.; A. Hamdy; B. Gencel and M. Sezen (2015). Corn yield response to saline irrigation water applied with atrickle system. Researchgate, http://www.researchgate.net/publication/265242964
Zhang, Q. T.; M. Inoue; K. Inosako; M. Irshad; K. Kondo; G. Y. Qiu and S. P. Wang (2008). Ameliorative effect of mulching on water use efficiency of Swiss chard and salt accumulation under saline irrigation. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol. 6 (3&4): 480-485. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 311 PDF Download: 267 |
||||
