WATER MANAGEMENT FOR SESAME CROP IN SANDY SOIL

Sharaf, G. A.; Khalil, A.; Hassan, Azza; Mahmoud, Hashem M.

doi:10.21608/mjae.2015.97743

	WATER MANAGEMENT FOR SESAME CROP IN SANDY SOIL
Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Article 8, Volume 32, Issue 4, October 2015, Page 1529-1552 PDF (1.28 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.97743
View on SCiNiTO
Authors
G. A. Sharaf¹; A. Khalil²; Azza Hassan²; Hashem M. Mahmoud³
¹Prof. of Ag. Eng., Soil Dept. Fac. of Ag.(Saba- Basha), Alexandria Univ., Egypt.
²Sen. Res., Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
³Researcher, Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to investigate the proper water regime of sesame crop under different irrigation methods in sandy soil in Egypt, Bostan West Delta. Two successive growing seasons of sesame production were conducted during 2013 and 2014 by the use of split plot design. The irrigation regime treatments were to apply 80%, 100% and 120% of the crop evapotranspiration. The three methods of irrigation were drip surface, drip subsurface and sprinkler methods. The irrigation intervals were 2 days and 4 days for the drip and sprinkler systems respectively. A seasonal water consumptive use by sesame were 490, 465 and 525 mm/season for drip surface, drip subsurface and sprinkler irrigation system respectively. Average irrigation applied water was 2641m³ /fed , 2496 m³ /fed and 4193 m³ /fed by the drip surface, drip subsurface and sprinkler systems respectively. The corresponding average seed yields were 557, 555 and 585 kg/fed.. Significant difference was found in seed production due to the irrigation system and the irrigation regime. The average oil yields were 237, 244 and 249.8 kg/fed. for the same previous order. The WUE of seeds and oil affected significantly by both the irrigation systems and irrigation regime. A high correlation was found between the biological yield and plant height, No. of capsules/plant and weight of dry seeds/plant as 0.86, 071 and 0.94 respectively. The yield functions of seeds and oil were non linear. A set of yield functions for seeds and oil under the different irrigation system were performed. The results indicated that when applying maximum irrigation water 2620 m³/fed., the subsurface drip irrigation system produced 702.6 kg seeds/fed. and 311.4 kg oil/fed., meanwhile the surface drip irrigation system produced 686.5 kg seeds/fed. and 304.8 kg oil/fed. when 2798.2 m³ water was added per fed. The sprinkle irrigation system produced 616.7 kg seeds/fed. and 268.1 kg oil/fed. when 4010.3 m³ water was added per fed.. Among all the study treatments, the application of subsurface drip irrigation system at 100% of ETc indicated the best results related with the yield of seeds and oil and the other yield components, Although, there is no significant difference between the irrigation water used between the subsurface drip and surface drip irrigation.


References
ASAE Standers 2001 : Standers, Engineering practices, data. No. 47143403. Amer. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI. pp 1027 ASCE, Describing Irrigation Efficiency and Uniformity. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., ASCE 1978, 104 (IRI), 35–41. Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira; D. Raes and Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, Rome , Italy. 297 pp. Benami, I. and A. Ofen 1984. Irrigation Engineering. Irrigation Engineering Publications (IESP), Haifa, Israel. 257 pp. Black, C. A., D. D. Evans, L.E.Ensminger, J. L. White, F. E. Clark and R. C. Dinauer. 1985. Methods of soil analyses. Seven Printing. Amer. Soc. of Agro. Madison, Wisconsin USA. Christiansen J.E. (1942): Irrigation by Sprinkling. California Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin, No. 670 CoHort Software (2005). Costat Statistical package (version 6.311), P.O.Box 1149, Berkeley, CA, 94701, USA. Doorenbos, J. and W. O. Pruit (1977). Guideline for predicting crop water requirments. FAO, Irrig. and Drain. Paper No. 24 pp: 122- 132 El-Wakil, A.M. and S.A. Gaafar, (1988). Effect of water stress on sesame. Assiut J. Agric. Sci., 9: 363-374. Erkan. B., D., Mehmet, M. Simsekd and S Gereck. (2007). Effect of irrigation methods and irrigation intervalsspacing on yield and yield components of sesame growing in arid area. J. of Agronomy 6 (3): 439-443. Kassab O.M., A.A. El-Noemani and H.A. El-Zeiny , (2005). Influence of Some Irrigation Systems and Water Regimes on Growth and Yield of Sesame Plants. J. of Agronomy, 4: 220-224. Li J and Rao M., 2004. Crop yield as affected by uniformity of sprinkler irrigation system. Agricultural Eng. Int: the CIGR J. Sci. Res. Dev. Manuscript LW01 004, 111. Manal M. T., S. A. Ouda and F. A. Khalil. (2007). Irrigation Optimization for Different Sesame Varieties Grown under Water Stress Conditions. J of Applied Sciences Research, 3(1): 7-12. Merriam J.L., Keller J. (1978): Farm Irrigation System Evaluation: A Guide for Management. Department of Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering, Utah State University, Logan.271 pp. Molden D. 2003. A water-productivity framework for understanding and action in: Kijne, J.W., Barker, R Molden, D. (Eds.), Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, pp. 1–18. Simonne, E. H. and M. D. Dukes, 2010. Principles and practices of irrigation management for vegetables. University of Florida, Hort. Sci. Extension. pp 17-23. Solomon, K. (1977). Evaluation criteria for trickle irrigation emission devices. Proc. 4th Annu. Int. Drip Irrig. Assoc. Meet. pp. 65-76. Vermeieren, I. and Gobling G. A., 1980. Localized irrigation. Design, installation, operation, evaluation. FAO paper No. 36. Walker, W.R. 1980. Sprinkler and Trickle Irrigation. Colorado Sate University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. 10 Chapters.
Statistics Article View: 231 PDF Download: 233