PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A MILLING MACHINE FOR PRODUCING BROILER PELLET CRUMBLES | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 3, Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2016, Page 29-42 PDF (1.03 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2016.98020 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Hanan, M.S. El-Shal | ||||
| Lecturer, Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The goal of this study is evaluating some operating parameters affecting performance of a roller mill and the particle size distribution during producing broiler crumbled feeds (CF) from poultry pellets for the phase of starter. These pellets were manufactured from standard formulation including ingredients with percentages that recommended to the broiler starter. The performance of the milling machine was evaluated under operational variables including; four different roller rotational speeds of 350, 400, 466.67 and 560 rpm corresponding to 2.75, 3.14, 3.66 and 4.40 m/s, three roll clearances of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mm ,three feeding rates of 1.3, 4.1 and 6.8 Mg/h. The performance of the machine was evaluated taking into consideration the machine capacity, particle size distribution of the CF, and energy requirement. The obtained results reveal that, it is recommended to use the roller mill at roll speed of 466.67 rpm (3.66 m/s), feeding rate of 6.80 Mg/h and roll clearance of 1.50 mm to achieve the best CF particle size distribution (˂1 mm= 19.45%, ˃1 mm= 29.46%, ˃2mm= 38.64% and ˃3 mm=12.45 %) that suit the broiler in the phase of starter at machine capacity of 5.650 Mg/h and consumed energy of about 0.476 kW.h/Mg. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| roller mill; broiler; crumbled feeds; particle size distribution; roll clearance | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Aviagen (2014) ROSS Broiler Management Handbook: Provision Feed and Water, 30 pp.
Banerjee, G.C. (1998) Poultry. Third edition, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta, India, 120-121 pp.
Behnke, K.C. (1994) Factors Affecting Pellet Quality. Maryland Nutrition Conference, Department of Poultry Science and Animal Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Madison, USA.
Behnke, K.C. (1998) Why pellet? in Proceeding. of Kansas State University /Amer. Feed Industry Association Pellet Conference, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Dozier, W.A. (2002) Reducing utility cost in the feed mill. Watt Poultry USA, 53:40-44 pp.
Jahan, M. S.; M. Asaduzzaman and A.K. Sarkar (2006) Performance of broiler fed on mash, pellet and crumble. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5 (3): 265-270 pp.
Mohamed, E.A. and E.A. Talha (2012) The effect of feeding pellets versus mash on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. Vol: 2 (2), www.bepls.com
Nir, I. and I. Ptichi (2001) Feed particle size and hardness: Influence on performance, nutritional, behavioral and metabolic aspects. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Feed Conference, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 157-186 pp.
Nir, I.; R. Hillel; I. Ptichi and G. Shefet (1995) Effect of particle size on performance. 3: Grinding pelleting interactions. Poultry Science, 74: 771-783 pp.
Waldroup, P.W. (1997) Particle size reduction of cereal grains and its significance in poultry nutrition. Technical Bulletin, American Soybean Association, Sinclearanceore, 14 pp. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 165 PDF Download: 223 |
||||
