SITE-SPECIFIC PIVOT SPRINKLER ASSESSED FOR SAVING WATER IN AGRICULTURE
Mostafa, H., Thormann, H. (2015). SITE-SPECIFIC PIVOT SPRINKLER ASSESSED FOR SAVING WATER IN AGRICULTURE. EKB Journal Management System, 32(2), 571-588. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98588
Harby Mostafa; H-H Thormann. "SITE-SPECIFIC PIVOT SPRINKLER ASSESSED FOR SAVING WATER IN AGRICULTURE". EKB Journal Management System, 32, 2, 2015, 571-588. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98588
Mostafa, H., Thormann, H. (2015). 'SITE-SPECIFIC PIVOT SPRINKLER ASSESSED FOR SAVING WATER IN AGRICULTURE', EKB Journal Management System, 32(2), pp. 571-588. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98588
Mostafa, H., Thormann, H. SITE-SPECIFIC PIVOT SPRINKLER ASSESSED FOR SAVING WATER IN AGRICULTURE. EKB Journal Management System, 2015; 32(2): 571-588. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98588

SITE-SPECIFIC PIVOT SPRINKLER ASSESSED FOR SAVING WATER IN AGRICULTURE

Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Article 11, Volume 32, Issue 2, April 2015, Page 571-588  XML PDF (1.02 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98588
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Harby Mostafaorcid 1; H-H Thormann2
1Agric. and Biosys. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Egypt.
2Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Braunschweig, Germany
Abstract
All center pivot systems currently available from the manufacturers can apply different rates of water during irrigation by varying speed. However, these systems generally cannot change the application rate along the length of the pivot boom. The whole system can speed up to apply less water or slow down to apply more. If a pivot is simultaneously crossing areas that are wet (drainage area) and dry (sandy), then a traditional system would have to address one problem of over- or under-irrigate one area or another. Conversely, a variable-rate pivot could apply less water to the wet area and more to the dry area at the same time. The system at the current study is a true variable rate center pivot. The system was developed and tested for two years where the water saving and sugar beet production were measured. Due to the dry weather in most of a season, the differences were clearer than the high rainy year during another season. The results indicated water saving in the second season (102 mm) while low change existed in water use in the first season (36 mm).  Sugar beet and sugar production were similar under full irrigation (100% of water balance) and VRI (80% of water balance) for loamy soil (medium quality) for both two seasons, which means that we can obtain the same production with water saving.   
Keywords
Variable rate irrigation; water saving; sugar beet; site-specific pivot
References
Al-Kufaishi, S., S. Blackmore, H. Sourell, and G. Maletti (2005). Assessment of two variable rate irrigation controllers used on a centre pivot. Agr. Eng. Int.: the CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript LW 05 002. Vol. VII.

ASABE (2012). S436.1: Test procedure for determining the uniformity of water distribution of center pivot and lateral move irrigation machines equipped with spray or sprinkler nozzles.  St. Joseph, MI:  ASABE. 

Evans, R. G., J. LaRue, K. C. Stone, and B.A. King (2013). Adoption of site-specific variable rate sprinkler irrigation systems.  Pub. from USDA-ARS / UNL Fac. Paper 1245. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1245 (accessed on March 2014).

Evans, R. G., J. LaRue, K. C. Stone, and B. A. King (2012). Adoption of site-specific variable rate sprinkler irrigation systems. Irrigation Science:1-17. 

Farmscan (2011). Operator’s manual. http://advancedagsystems.com/PDF/7000VRI_USA.pdf

Fraser, T. (2011). Variable-rate irrigation. landcare research. http://www.ourfuture.net.nz/Stories/122 (accessed on August 2013).

Hedley C., I. Yule, M. Tuohy, and I. Vogeler (2009). Key performance indicators for variable rate irrigation implementation on variable soils. St. Joseph, ASABE.

Hedley, C. B. and I. J. Yule (2009). Soil water status mapping and two variable‐rate irrigation scenarios. Precision Agriculture 10(4):342 ‐355. 

Hezarjaribi, A., H. Sourell, and F-J. Bockisch (2008). Site-specific for subfields: Development of irrigation map and a dynamic control for center pivot. Landtechnik, volume 63(3), Pp: 154-155, in German.

Kikiras, P.C., and D. Drakoulis (2003). The European approach to augmented satellite based positioning systems and their application in precision farming, proceedings of the Int.  Symp. at Volos,  Greece,  7–9, Nov. 2003.

Konstantinos, K., X.Apostolos, K. Panagiotis, and S. George (2007). Topology optimization in wireless sensor networks for precision agriculture applications. Sensor Tec. and Apps. 2007. Int. Conf. on sensor Comm.: 526–530.

Liu X. and X. Li, (2013). Application of information technology for Precision agriculture. ASABE Ann. Int. Mtg. Spon. by ASABE  Kansas City, Missouri July 21 – 24.

McCarthy, A.C., N.H. Hancock, and S.R. Raine (2010). VARIwise: A general-purpose adaptive control framework for spatially and temporally varied irrigation at sub-field level.  Computers and Electronics in Agr., 70: 117-128.

Thörmann, H-H, K. Nolting, M. Kraft, and H. Sourell (2012). Possibilities of precision irrigation. Aquarius – Proj. report. Agr. chamber Lower Saxony District at Uelzen.: 101-119, in German.

Vellidis, G. 2005. A real-time smart sensor array for scheduling irrigation in cotton, NESPAL – Nat. Envi. Sound Prod. Agr. Lab.

Statistics
Article View: 186
PDF Download: 196