EFFECT OF STORAGE CONDITIONS ON THE QUALITY OF ONION BULBS | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 13, Volume 31, Issue 3, July 2014, Page 919-936 PDF (1.01 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2014.98928 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| M. H. Hatem1; S. A. Shehata1; Y. B. AbdEl-hay2; Karima F. AbdEl-Gwad3; B. A. Abaker3 | ||||
| 1Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo University, Egypt | ||||
| 2Veg. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo University, Egypt | ||||
| 3Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Zalingei University, Sudan | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Onion is one of the important commercial vegetable crops grown on a large scale in many countries. As the onion bulbs are to be stored for long period for use during off-season, a considerable loss occurs by way of deteriorating, sprouting, and moisture evaporation during storage.This study was conducted to investigate the effect of storage conditions on the quality parameters of onion bulbs, in objective to keep quality, reduce losses, prolong shelf life and keep the price stable and ensure uniform providing of the onion bulbs during the year. Three different storage conditions were used namely, forced ventilated, natural ventilated and traditional storage systems. The considered parameters of the onion bulbs those to be studied are moisture loss, deterioration, sprouting and marketable percentage. The environmental factors such as temperature and relative humidity were recorded during storage. The results indicated that, the average temperature in center of onion pile during the storage period ranged between 16.73 to 28.61 ˚C for the forced ventilated, where it was ranged between 18.18 to 31.03 ˚C for the natural ventilated, while in traditional storage system ranged between 19.52 to 32.93 ˚C. The bulbs stored under natural ventilated system showed the lowest moisture loss 2.83 %, and the lowest percentage of deterioration 6.55%, while lowest percentage of sprouting was recorded for the forced ventilated and natural ventilated systems 1.47 and 1.52%, respectively. The forced ventilated and natural ventilated storage systems recorded maximum marketable percentage (85.31 and 83.55% respectively), compared to traditional storage system (81.51%). According to above results, natural ventilated with perforated pipes can be recommended for local community, which assure simplicity and easy to apply. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| storage systems; onion bulbs; temperature; relative humidity; forced ventilation; natural ventilation; traditional system; moisture losses; onion pile; deterioration; sprouting | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Anonymous (1994). Post-harvest losses, Research Digest, AICRP on Post-Harvest Technology (1980-90), Gujarat Agric. University, Junagadh, India. p. 9.
Aoyagi, M.; Makino, H. and Sato, J. (1997). The effect of storage temperature on keeping quality of onion bulbs. Research Bulletin Aichiken, 9: 54-60.
Bongiwar, D.R. and Shirsat, S.G. (2000). Demonstration food irradiation facilities for prevention of losses due to sprouting in onion and garlic by use of gamma radiation at Lasalgoan in maharashtra. National Research Centre for Onion and Garlic, Rajgurunagar, Nasik, pp. 32-36.
Brewster, J.L. (1994). Onions and Other Vegetable Alliums. Wallingford, UN: CAB International.
Chavan, V.B.; Dsouza, T.F. and Rajeshkumar, A. (1997). Evaluation of different structures for storage of onions. Vegetable Science, 24(1): 73-74.
Electricity Council (1981). Vegetable conditioning and storage- onion. Technical information AGR 8-2.
FAOSTAT (2011). Food and agricultural organization of the united nations, statistical database (www.faostat.es). Agricultural production. Postharvest treatment
Gubb, I.R and Tavish, H.S.M. (2002). Allium crop science, Recent Advance ed. by Ravinowitch, H.D and Currah, L. 10 Onion Pre and Post-harvest considerations, walling ford Oxon: CABI Publishing. pp.233-265.
Jamali, L. A.; Ibupotp, K. A.; Chattha, S. H. and Laghari, R. B. (2012). Study on physiological weight loss in onion varieties during storage. Pak. J. Agri., Agri. Engg., Vet. Sci., 28 (1): 1-7.
Kader, A. A. (1992). Postharvest biology and technology: An overview. In Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. Publication 3311. Pp.15-37. University of California, Division of Agric. and Natural Resources.
Maini, S.B. and Chakrabarti, A.K. (2000). Postharvest management of onions and garlic. Souvenir, National Symposium on Onion and Garlic Production and Postharvest Management: Challenges and Strategies, 19-21 Nov.2000, National Research Centre for Onion and Garlic, Rajgurunagar, Nasik, pp. 25-32.
Maw, B. W.; Seebold, K. W.; Purvis, A. C. and Paulk, J. T. (2005). Low humidity, warm air storage effective for medium-term storage of sweet onions. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 21(2): 259-264.
Musa, S.K.; Abdalla, Y.M.; Haimoura, E. and Suliman, Y. (1994). Improvement of onion storage in the Sudan. Tropical Sciences, 34(2): 185-190.
Opara, L. U. (2003). Chapter XXVI Onions: Post-Harvest Operation, Mejia D, Parrucci E, (eds) Compendium on Post–Harvest Operations, FAO Information Network on Postharvest Operations, http://www.fao.org/inpho/
Pandey, U.B. (1989). Problems in post-harvest handling of onion and current status of research work done by AADF in the field of post-harvest technology. Associated Agric. Develop. Foundation, Nasik. Newsletter No. 3 & 4, Vol. 9.
Ramin, A. A. (1999). Storage potential of bulb onion under high temperature. Journal of Horticultural Sciences and Biotechnology, 74(2): 181-186.
Ranpise, S.A.; Birade, R.M.; Patil, B.T. and Sawant, S.V. (2001). Factors affecting the storage of onion: A Review. The Orissa Journal of Horticulture, 29(1): 1-12.
Salunkhi, D.K. and Desai, B.B. (1984). Postharvest biotechnology of vegetables. Vol. II., CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 23-34. Shippers, P.A. (1968). A preliminary experiment for weight loss in onions. N.Z. Comm. Grow. 23(10): 23-29.
Slade, L. and Levine, H. (1991). Beyond water activity: recent advances based on an alternative approach to the assessment of food quality and safety. CRC Critical Reviews on food science and nutrition, 30:115-360.
Thampson , A.K.; Booth, R.H. and Proctor, F.J. (1972). Onion storage in tropics. Tropical Sciences, 14(1): 19-34.
Tripathi, P.C. and Lawande, K.E. ( 2003). Onion storage structure for small and marginal farmers. ICAR News, A Science and Technology Newsletter, 9(4): 18-19.
Va´zquez-Barrios; M.E. Lo´pez-Echevarrı´a; G. Mercado-Silva; E. Castan˜o-Tostado; E. Leo´n-Gonza´lez, F. (2006). Study and prediction of quality changes in garlic cv. Perla (Allium sativum L.) stored at different temperatures. Scientia Horticulturae, 108 : 127–132
Wilhelm, L.R.; Dwayne A. S. and Gerald H. B. (2004). Physical Properties of Food Materials. Chapter 2 in Food & Process Engineering Technology, 23-52. St. Joseph, Michigan: ASAE. © American Society of Agricultural Engineers. (Rev. Aug. 2005). | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 258 PDF Download: 1,278 |
||||
