DESIGNING AND VALIDATING A TOOL TO ASSESS RISKS AFFECTED HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN PORT SAID CITY

mohammed abd el salam, faten ahmed; El–Said, Sahar Hamdy; Abdel-Azeem, Sanaa Ibrahim; Abdel-Aleem, Marwa Mohammed

doi:10.21608/pssjn.2020.24493.1015

	DESIGNING AND VALIDATING A TOOL TO ASSESS RISKS AFFECTED HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN PORT SAID CITY
Port Said Scientific Journal of Nursing
Article 9, Volume 7, Issue 1, June 2020, Page 119-137 PDF (324.42 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/pssjn.2020.24493.1015
View on SCiNiTO
Authors
faten ahmed mohammed abd el salam ¹; Sahar Hamdy El–Said²; Sanaa Ibrahim Abdel-Azeem³; Marwa Mohammed Abdel-Aleem³
¹administration,nursing,Mansoura,Dakhalia
²Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing,El-Zagazig University
³Administration Department, Faculty of Nursing, PortSaid University
Abstract
*Background:* Today, maintaining quality while eliminating risk is a major challenge facing everyone in the healthcare delivery system. Also, the Patients, healthcare system expect the best care possible, and as well as administrators of healthcare organizations expect healthcare providers to deliver this best care in the most efficient manner. Design: A methodological research design was used to design and validating a tool to assess risks affected hospitalized patient in Port Said city. Setting: The study was conducted in Port Said General Hospital and El –Zohour Hospital. Subject: A sample of 35 experts (faculty and non-faculty members) in nursing and medical field was recruited (jury group). Opinionnaire validating sheet was used for data collection. Results: The highest percentage of the jury group members agreed upon all items, with no statistically significant differences between the two jury groups. The highly reliability coefficient was for the general work condition domain 0.969, while the lowest was for fire measures domain 0.453. *Conclusion:* The results demonstrated that the majority of two jury group agreed upon the general form (face validity), content of the environmental risk factors tool. *Recommendations:* Further studies are needed for testing the applicability of the tool. Generalize the designed tool to be used in other hospitals in the country.
Keywords
Designing; Validating; Tool; Risk; Patients


References
Abo–El Hassan, N. (2011): Designing and validating a tool to assess environmental risk factors affecting hospitalized patients. (Unpublished doctorate thesis, faculty of nursing, Ain Shams University, Egypt). Association for Professional in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). (2015): 2^nd edition text of infection control and epidemiology, aseptic technique- 20-2, respiratory care 63. Burden, Quinn, O’Brien and Dawes, (2010):Quality assurance and risk reduction guidelines. Acta Cytol. ...... Quinn MA. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix – are there arguments for a different. Available at www.cervicalcheck.ie/QAfinal- web-version. Carayon, P., & Alvarado, C. J. (2007): Workload and patient safety among critical care nurses. Critical care nursing clinics of North America, 19(2), 121-129.‏ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008): Self-reported falls and fall-related injuries among persons aged > or = 65 years--United States, 2006. MMWR: Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 57(9), 225-229.‏ Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013): Research Methods in Education. Routledge Department of Education and Training (DET) (2008):Guidelines for assessing competence in VET. DET, East Perth, Western Australia.‏ Espin, S., Lingard, L., Baker, G. R., & Regehr, G. (2016): Persistence of unsafe practice in everyday work: an exploration of organizational and psychological factors constraining safety in the operating room. BMJ Quality & Safety, 15(3), 165-170.‏ Fitzpatrick, J. J. (Ed.) & Kazer, M.W. [Wallace], (Assoc. Ed). (2011): Encyclopedia of Nursing Research. 3rd Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company, ISBN (9780826107503), Publication date, August 24, 2011. George, J., Farina, (2015): Environment of Care; Hand Book. Second Edition.Joint Commission Resources. USA. New York. Hansen, E., Landstad, B. J., Gundersen, K. T., & Vinberg, S. (2016):Leader-Based Workplace Health Interventions—A Before–After Study in Norwegian and Swedish Small-Scale Enterprises. International Journal of Disability Management, 11.‏ Hessler, K., & Humphreys, J. (2008): Student evaluations: Advice for novice faculty. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(4), 187-189. ‏ Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) (2012):The Safety Checklist Program: Creating a Culture of Safety in Intensive Care Units. Volume 28, Number6 Khatab, A. (2013): Reliability and Validity of Measures. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31 (6), 648- 658. McDonald, K.M. (2009):Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices Evidence report/technology assessment, No 43. New York, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Fatigue, sleepiness, and medical errors. Chapter 40. Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/chap40.htm. OSHA Inspection Checklist (2009): Presented by OSHA council. www.abc.org/. p. 309. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. t, & Hungler, BP, (2010): Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, appraisal and Ufilizafion.‏ Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.‏
Statistics Article View: 147 PDF Download: 257

DESIGNING AND VALIDATING A TOOL TO ASSESS RISKS AFFECTED HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN PORT SAID CITY

Fitzpatrick, J. J. (Ed.) & Kazer, M.W. [Wallace], (Assoc. Ed). (2011): Encyclopedia of Nursing Research. 3rd Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company, ISBN (9780826107503), Publication date, August 24, 2011.