A SIMPLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR MEASURING ADVANCE TIME AND WATER HEIGHT IN FURROW IRRIGATION SYSTEM | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 30, Issue 4, October 2013, Page 1059-1078 PDF (699.96 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2013.99893 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| A. E. Guirguis1; A. M. Zayton1; S. G. Hemeda2 | ||||
| 1Sen. Res., Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Researcher, Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| A simple electronic device was designed and created instead of traditional method for measuring advance, recession times and water heights inside and along furrows to be more convenient with an optimization method based on the volume balance approach, originally developed for estimating infiltration parameters for furrow irrigation. Field experiments were conducted at a sugar crops research station- Alexandria, where sugar beet was grown in clay soils to test the accuracy of the developed device work in measurements. The furrow irrigation inflow rates were 1.14, 1.42 and 2.25 (l/s). Measurement parameters included furrow geometry, slope, width, length, advance and recession times, and furrow water heights through irrigation event for each inflow rate. A volume balance method was applied to simulate water flow in the furrow system. The results obtained from the used device were compared with the field collected data by traditional method. The results showed that total advance times (tL) were 56.0, 42.4, and 30.5 min, while, total recession times (tR) were 70.0, 53.4, and 46.0 min, for each inflow rate, respectively. The recession time increased as inflow rate decreased; this revealed to water infiltrated into soil takes more time to disappear. Water infiltrated volume increased when inflow rate was decreased due to slow water movement along the furrow. Maximum calculated values of the infiltrated volumes (Vcal) were 0.515, 0.424, and 0.346 (m3/furrow length) while, minimum values were 0.353, 0.299, and 0.271 (m3/furrow length), by applying 1.14, 1.42 and 2.25 (l/s) inflow rates, respectively. The verification results between measured and calculated data showed that, the data for all the irrigation events with the optimization method using modified Kostiakov equation, fall very close to the 45о line degree with deviate a little. This means, that the used electronic device is expected to be superior for estimating infiltration characteristics and evaluating furrow irrigation system with high accuracy. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abbasi, F., F. J. Adamsen, D. J. Hunsker, J. Shouse and M. Th Van Genuchten. (2003). Effects of flow depth on water flow and solute transport in furrow irrigation: Field data analysis. J. Irrig . and Drain. Eng. ASCE, (129): 237-246.
Amer, K.H. (2007). Surface irrigation evaluation based on analytical interrelation among water infiltration, advance, and recession. Proceeding of Irrigation Association, 9-11 Dec in San Diego, CA: 433-445.
Ampas, V. and E. Baltas. (2009) Optimization of the furrow irrigation efficiency. Global NEST Journal, 11 (4) : 566-574.
Bassett, L. D., D. D. Frangmeier and T. Strelkoff . (1983). Hydraulics of Surface Irrigation, In: Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems, Edited by Jensen, ASAE, PP: 449-498.
Clemmens, A.J.( 2007) Simple approach to surface irrigation design Theory. Journal of Land and Water. 1: 1-19.
Elliott, R. L. and W. R. Walker. (1982). Field evaluation of furrow infiltration and advance functions. Trans. of the ASAE, (25): 396-400.
Esfandiari, M. and B. L. Maheshwari. (1997). Application of the optimization method for estimating infiltration characteristics in furrow irrigation and its comparison with other methods. Agricultural Water Management 34: 169-185.
Forrest M. Mimis. (1989) .Engineer’s Mini –Notebook SSS timer IC circuits, cat. No. 276-5010.
Hunsaker, D.J., D.E. Pettit, and A.J. Clemmens. (2011). A-self-contained probe for measuring water advance and recession times in surface irrigated fields. App. Eng. In Agric. 27 (5): 729-736.
Lal, R. and A. C. Pandya. (1972). Volume balance method for computing infiltration rates in surface irrigation. Trans., ASAE, 15: 69-72.
Larry G. James (1993). Principles of farm irrigation system design. Krieger publishing company Malabar, Florida. PP:301:381.
Maheshwari, B.L., A.K. Turner, T.A. McMahon and B.J. Campbell . (1988). An optimization technique for estimating infiltration characteristics in border irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 13:13-24.
Oyonarte, N. A., L. Mateos and M. J. Palomo. (2002). Infiltration variability in furrow infiltration. J. Irrig. and Drain.Eng., ASCE, 128: 26-33.
Strelkoff, T. and F. Souza. (1984) Modeling effect of depth on furrow irrigation. J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 110(4):375-387.
Trout, T. J. (1992). Flow velocity and wetted perim effects on furrow infiltration, Trans. Of the ASAE, (35): 855-862.
Walker, W.R. and J.D. Busman (1990). Real-time estimation of furrow infiltration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Eng., ASCE, 116(3): 299-318.
Wöhling, Th., R. Singh, and G. H. Schmitz. (2004). Physically based modeling of interacting surface-subsurface flow during furrow irrigation advance. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 130(5) : 349–356. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 141 PDF Download: 195 |
||||
