COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT VERTICAL BOOM SPRAYER NOZZLES FOR | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 8, Volume 31, Issue 1, January 2014, Page 155-172 PDF (1.11 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2014.99957 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| S. M. Younis1; K. M. Abdelbary2; M. S. M. Metawe3 | ||||
| 1Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Assist. Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 3M. Sc. Student, Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Recent research work deals with using vertical spray booms for the safe and efficient application of crop protection chemicals in greenhouses. Nozzle type and setting significantly affect spray deposition and crop nutrition and should be carefully considered. Six different types of nozzles were tested and calibrated with two operating pressures for each and different spacing between nozzles. Wetted radius, precipitation rate, discharge were measured and calculated. Nozzle types included: Copper nozzle, Plastic nozzle with four exits, Single fogger (naandan®), Oblique nozzle, Rondo flow-regulated mini sprinkler (green) (RFR) and Rondo mist sprayer (violet). Copper nozzle was recommended for further aspects of selection and technical evaluation. It is demonstrated the best delivery of pest and the best distribution in the lap and inside the greenhouse after testing. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| greenhouse; delivery; pest management; environment; vertical boom; prototype; distribution; spray deposition | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abuarab,M.E.,M. H., Hassan,A. E. Badr, M. El-Sherbini. (2008). Water and soil moisture distribution patterns under micro sprinkler irrigation systems. Ph. D. Thesis. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University.
Braekman, P., D. Foque., M. C. Labeke, G. Pieters and D. Nuyttens. (2009) Influence of spray application technique on spray deposition in greenhouse ivy pot plants grown on hanging shelves, HORTSCIENCE, 44(7):1921–1927.
Braekman, P. , D. Foque, W. Messens, M.C. Van Labeke, J G Pietersd and D. Nuyttens. ( 2007). Effect of spray application technique on spray deposition in greenhouse strawberries and tomatoes. ASABE Annual International Meeting, (April 2009), P: 203-212.
Burks, T. (2006). Development of a prototype greenhouse robotic sprayer system, FNGLA, Endowed Research Fund, Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Dept, University of Florida. USA.
Derksen, R., C. Ranger, L.A. Cañas, J.C. Locke, H. Zhu and C. R. Krause.(2009).Comparison of handgun and boom spray delivery systems for greenhouses. ASABE Annual International Meeting.Paper Number: 097453.
Derksen, R., J. Frantz, C. Ranger, J. Locke, H. Zhu and C. Krause.(2007)a. The effect of spray volume and quality on handgun delivery of pesticides to greenhouse plants.ASABE Annual International Meeting.2950 Niles Roads, St. Joseph, Michigan 49085-9659. USA.
Fritz, B., W. C. Hoffmann and W. E. Bagley.(2010). Effects of spray mixtures on droplet size under aerial application conditions and implications on drift. ASABE, Vol. 26(1): 21-29.
Miller P., A. Lane and H. Wheeler.(2001).Matching spray applications to canopy characteristics in cereal crops Princeton Architectural Press, New York, ISBN 1-56898-242-9
Nuyttens D., M. De Schampheleire, K. Baetens and B. Sonck.(2007). The influence of operator-controlled variables on spray drift from field crop sprayers. ASABE, Vol. 50(4): 1129-1140
Nuyttens D., M. De Schampheleire, P. Verboven, E. Brusselman and D. Dekeyser.(2009). Droplet size and velocity characteristics of agricultural sprays. ASABE, Vol. 52(5): 1471-1480.
Nuyttens, D., S. Windey and B. Sonck .(2004). Optimization of a vertical spray boom for greenhouse sprayapplications. Biosystems Engineering.P: 417-423.
Pascuzzi S., A. Guarella. (2008). Pesticide application over covered crops with hand held equipment: analysis of the contaminations. International Conference: September 15-17, 2008 Ragusa – Italy
Van Os, E.A., J.M.G.P. Michielsen, F.J.M. Corver, J.V. van den Berg, M.A. Bruins, H.A.J. Porskamp and J.C. van de Zande.(2005). Reduction of spray pressure leads to less emission and better deposition of spray liquid at high-volume spraying in greenhouse tomato. WUR-Agro technology and Food Innovations, Wageningen, Netherlands. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 168 PDF Download: 208 |
||||
