Numerical study of shock waves in non-ideal magnetogasdynamics (MHD) | ||||
| Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society | ||||
| Volume 24, Issue 1, 2016, Page 116-124 PDF (861.25 K) | ||||
| DOI: 10.1016/j.joems.2014.10.002 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Addepalli Ramu; Narsimhulu Dunna; Dipak Kumar Satpathi | ||||
| Department of Mathematics, BITS-Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, India | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| One-dimensional unsteady adiabatic flow of strong converging shock waves in cylindrical or spherical symmetry in MHD, which is propagating into plasma, is analyzed. The plasma is assumed to be non-ideal gas whose equation of state is of Mie–Gruneisen type. Suitable transformations reduce the governing equations into ordinary differential equations of Poincare type. In the present work, McQueen and Royce equations of state (EOS) have been considered with suitable material constants and the spherical and cylindrical cases are worked out in detail to investigate the behavior and the influence on the shock wave propagation by energy input and b(q/q0), the measure of shock strength. The similarity solution is valid for adiabatic flow as long as the counter pressure is neglected. The numerical technique applied in this paper provides a global solution to the implosion problem for the flow variables, the similarity exponent a for different Gruneisen parameters. It is shown that increasing b(q/q0) does not automatically decelerate the shock front but the velocity and pressure behind the shock front increases quickly in the presence of the magnetic field and decreases slowly and become constant. This becomes true whether the piston is accelerated, is moving at constant speed or is decelerated. These results are presented through the illustrative graphs and tables. The magnetic field effects on the flow variables through a medium and total energy under the influence of strong magnetic field are also presented. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Similarity solutions; Shock waves; Magnetogasdynamics; Rankine–Hugoniot condition; Mie–Gruneisen type; Numerical solution | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 42 PDF Download: 45 |
||||
