Are microscopy and culture enough to diagnose Dientamoeba fragilis: A preliminary study | ||||
| Parasitologists United Journal | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 17, Issue 3, December 2024, Page 222-226 PDF (388.71 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/puj.2024.316334.1267 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Maha Abou-Gamra; Rania Tawfik; John Nazeer   ; Sara Alkady
| ||||
| Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Detection of D. fragilis relies upon microscopic examination of permanently stained fixed stool smears, and/or culture. Although molecular diagnostic techniques, were developed for several pathogens, those for D. fragilis are not used routinely. Objective: To evaluate usefulness of nested PCR in diagnosis of D. fragilis. Patients and Methods: Fresh stool samples were collected from 100 children aged 6-12 y complaining of gastrointestinal disturbances. Samples were subjected to microscopic examination of iron hematoxylin stained smears, culture in Loeffler’s medium and nPCR. Results: The study detected D. fragilis molecularly in 4% of samples (4/100) and by microscopy and culture on Loeffler’s medium in 2% (2/100). Molecular assay showed 100% sensitivity and specificity compared to microscopy (50%, and 95%, respectively), and Loeffler’s culture medium (50%, and 100% respectively). Conclusion: Nested PCR offers superior accuracy over microscopy and culture for diagnosis. In cases where PCR is not accessible in a diagnostic laboratory, at least two alternative diagnostic methods should be employed. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| diagnosis; dientamoebiasis; intestinal protozoa; loeffler’s culture; molecular assay; trichomonad | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 79 PDF Download: 146 |
||||
