Social and Digital Transformations in Service Design | ||||
| International Design Journal | ||||
| Article 25, Volume 15, Issue 5 - Serial Number 68, September and October 2025, Page 339-350 PDF (1.47 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/idj.2025.435244 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
sara taha   ; fekry gamal Abrahim; abdelnabi aboel-magd abdelmotagaly
| ||||
| Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Applied Arts, Helwan University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| In recent decades, the world has undergone profound social and digital transformations that have reshaped how services are designed and delivered. Through digital technologies, such as (AI), (IoT), and Cloud Computing are redefining public service systems, user experiences, and social structures in key sectors like healthcare, education, and transportation. This study analyzes the impact of digital and social transformations on service design within social contexts, aiming to propose a unified framework that ensures effective, inclusive, and socially responsible service delivery. It emphasizes the importance of integrating social ergonomics to enhance user satisfaction, well-being, productivity, and collaboration within service environments. This research adopts a descriptive-analytical methodology, supported by an in-depth study of digital transformation and its social impacts, to illustrate service design as a transformative force for building more just and humane digital societies, in line with the principles of social work environment. The findings reveal that digital transformation not only changes service delivery mechanisms but also reshapes patterns of social interaction, gender roles, cultural identity, family dynamics, community engagement, and the nature of work. This calls for design models that are fully aligned with social and cultural contexts. Therefore, integrating social ergonomics into service design promotes well-being and social responsibility, enhances trust, belonging, equality, and balances human-technology interactions. Ultimately, the study concludes that service design must go beyond technical efficiency to include ethical, cultural, and social dimensions. By adopting socially responsible design principles rooted in a social work environment and contributing to collective well-being. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Social ergonomics; service design; begins with the types of products and services; social structural changes; service design certificates are considered social | ||||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||||
| References | ||||
|
1- Al-Khulaifi, M. (2021). Digital Transformation in Egyptian Public Services. Journal of E-Government Studies, 12(3), 45–58.
2- Anderson, T. (2016). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed.). AU Press.
3- Cipolla, C., & Bartholo, R. (2014). Empathy or inclusion: A dialogical approach to socially responsible design. International Journal of Design, 8(2), 87-100. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3432465161/empathy-or-inclusion-a-dialogical-approach-to-socially
4- Clegg, C. W. (2000). Sociotechnical principles for system design. Applied Ergonomics, 31(5), 463–477.
5- Cooper, R. (2005). Ethics and altruism: What constitutes socially responsible design? Design Management Review, 16(3), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2005.tb00197.x
6- Davenport, T. H., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
7- De Vere, Ian; Bissett-Johnson, Katherine; Thong, Christine (2009). Educating the responsible engineer: Socially responsible design and sustainability in the curriculum. Swinburne. Conference contribution. https://doi.org/10.25916/sut.26227055.v1
8- Ferreira, A.M., Souleles, N., Savva, S. (2020). Social Design, Innovation and Ergonomics: Reflections on Education, Transdisciplinarity and New Blurred Models for Sustainable Social Change, AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 970. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_4
9- G.V., Baranova. (2022). Paradoxes and contradictions of family relations in a transforming society. Vestnik RGGU, 1(1):86-96. doi: 10.28995/2073-6401-2022-1-86-96
10- Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2016). Digital transformation challenges. In MCIS 2016 Proceedings.
11- Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
12- Jane Gregory, (2015), Science Communication, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), Elsevier, Pages 219-224, dol: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.95088-8
13- Kiely, S., & Waller, D. (2021). "Designing Employee Experience: The Key to Effective Service Delivery," Journal of Service Management, 32(1), 24-37.
14- Lacy, P., & McDowell, M. (2020). "Sustainability in Service Design: Integrating Environmental and Social Value," Journal of Business and Environmental Sustainability, 28(4), 87-101
15- Lee, S., Oh, H. Y., & Choi, J. (2021). Service Design Management and Organizational Innovation Performance. Sustainability, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010004
16- Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2021). "Understanding the Role of Omnichannel Experiences in Service Design," Journal of Service Research, 24(2), 123-136.
17- Lupton, D. (2014). Self-tracking cultures: Towards a sociology of personal informatics. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/2686612.2686623
18- Nosratabadi, S., Atobishi, T., & Hegedűs, S. (2023). Social Sustainability of Digital Transformation: Empirical Evidence from EU-27 Countries. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050126
19- Qian Sun& Carolyn Runcie, Is Service Design in Demand?, Design Management (dmi): Journal, Volume11, Issue1,19 June 2017, Pages 67-78, DO: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmj.12028
20- Sanders, E. B. N., et al. (2020). "Co-Creation in Service Design: The Role of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration," Design Management Review, 31(4), 42-55.
21- Sangiorgi, D., & Junginger, S. (2015). Service design as a transformative approach to innovation. Design Journal, 18(2), 193-210 .
22- Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.
23- Sterne, J., et al. (2020). "AI and Big Data in Service Design: Advancing from Descriptive to Prescriptive Analytics," Journal of Service Design, 21(4), 129-145.
24- UNCTAD. (2021). COVID-19 and E-commerce: A Global Review. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2020d13_en.pdf
25- Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Press.
26- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
27- Vink, J., & Koskela-Huotari, K. (2021). Building Reflexivity Using Service Design Methods. Journal of Service Research, 25(3), 371-389, . https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211035004 (
28- Vrbek, S. and Jukić, T. (2024), "Co-creation service readiness model: a decision support for the selection of public services suitable for improvement through co-creation", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 13-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2023-0031
Zeng M, et al. (2021) A Deep Learning Framework for Identifying Essential Proteins by Integrating Multiple Types of Biological Information. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 18(1), 296-305 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 305 PDF Download: 20 |
||||
