النزاعات القانونية الناشئة عن استخدام خدمات التخزين السحابي: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة / Legal Disputes Arising from the Use of Cloud Storage Services A Comparative Analytical Study
العتيبي, . (2025). النزاعات القانونية الناشئة عن استخدام خدمات التخزين السحابي: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة / Legal Disputes Arising from the Use of Cloud Storage Services A Comparative Analytical Study. EKB Journal Management System, 50(50), 3939-4039. doi: 10.21608/jlr.2025.393611.1763
بدر سعد العتيبي. "النزاعات القانونية الناشئة عن استخدام خدمات التخزين السحابي: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة / Legal Disputes Arising from the Use of Cloud Storage Services A Comparative Analytical Study". EKB Journal Management System, 50, 50, 2025, 3939-4039. doi: 10.21608/jlr.2025.393611.1763
العتيبي, . (2025). 'النزاعات القانونية الناشئة عن استخدام خدمات التخزين السحابي: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة / Legal Disputes Arising from the Use of Cloud Storage Services A Comparative Analytical Study', EKB Journal Management System, 50(50), pp. 3939-4039. doi: 10.21608/jlr.2025.393611.1763
العتيبي, . النزاعات القانونية الناشئة عن استخدام خدمات التخزين السحابي: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة / Legal Disputes Arising from the Use of Cloud Storage Services A Comparative Analytical Study. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 50(50): 3939-4039. doi: 10.21608/jlr.2025.393611.1763

النزاعات القانونية الناشئة عن استخدام خدمات التخزين السحابي: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة / Legal Disputes Arising from the Use of Cloud Storage Services A Comparative Analytical Study

مجلة البحوث الفقهية والقانونية
Volume 50, Issue 50, July 2025, Pages 3939-4039    PDF (1.36 M)
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية
DOI: 10.21608/jlr.2025.393611.1763
Author
بدر سعد العتيبي*
الكويت
Abstract
تُقدم هذه الدراسة تحليلًا معمقًا للنزاعات القانونية الناشئة عن الاستخدام المتزايد لخدمات التخزين السحابي، من خلال تحليل الإطار القانوني، واستعراض أهم الإشكاليات التي تثيرها في مختلف الأنظمة القانونية. وتهدف الدراسة إلى بيان مدى كفاية القوانين الحالية في تنظيم العلاقة بين مزودي هذه الخدمات ومستخدميها، وتحليل أوجه القصور التي قد تؤدي إلى نشوء منازعات قضائية.
وتُبرز الدراسة أبرز المشكلات القانونية، مثل تحديد الاختصاص القضائي في النزاعات العابرة للحدود، والمسؤولية القانونية لمزودي خدمات التخزين السحابي عند فقدان أو اختراق البيانات، وكذلك إشكالية حماية خصوصية المستخدمين وحقوقهم الرقمية. كما تتطرق إلى أحكام العقود الإلكترونية المبرمة بين الأطراف، وإشكاليات الإثبات الرقمي عند نشوء المنازعات.
وتعتمد الدراسة على منهج مقارن بين القوانين والتشريعات ذات الصلة في بعض الأنظمة القانونية، مثل القانون الأوروبي، والقانون الأمريكي، والقانون المصري، بهدف الوقوف على أوجه التشابه والاختلاف في تنظيم هذه الخدمات وحماية حقوق المستخدمين.
وخلصت الدراسة إلى ضرورة تطوير الإطار التشريعي الوطني والدولي، بما يضمن حماية حقوق المستخدمين ومزودي الخدمات على حد سواء، ويدعم مبادئ العدالة الرقمية. كما توصي الدراسة بضرورة تعزيز التعاون الدولي لوضع قواعد موحدة أو اتفاقيات دولية لمعالجة النزاعات الناشئة عن خدمات التخزين السحابي، بما يحقق التوازن بين متطلبات الابتكار وحماية الحقوق القانونية.
 
This study offers an in-depth analysis of the legal disputes arising from the increasing use of cloud storage services. It examines the legal framework governing such disputes and identifies the key issues that arise in various legal systems. The study aims to assess the adequacy of current laws in regulating the relationship between cloud service providers and their users, while analyzing potential gaps that may lead to legal disputes.
The study highlights the most significant legal issues, such as determining jurisdiction in cross-border disputes, the legal liability of cloud storage providers in cases of data loss or breaches, as well as challenges related to the protection of users’ privacy and digital rights. It also addresses the provisions of electronic contracts concluded between the parties and the evidentiary challenges of digital evidence in the event of disputes.
The study adopts a comparative approach, examining relevant laws and regulations in selected legal systems, such as European law, American law, and Egyptian law. This comparative analysis seeks to identify the similarities and differences in regulating these services and in safeguarding users’ rights.
The study concludes that it is necessary to develop national and international legislative frameworks to ensure the protection of both users and service providers, while supporting the principles of digital justice. Furthermore, it recommends enhancing international cooperation to establish unified rules or international agreements to address disputes arising from cloud storage services, thereby striking a balance between fostering innovation and protecting legal rights.
Keywords
الحوسبة السحابية، حماية البيانات من السرقة، الخصوصية، الأمن السيبراني، الاختصاص القضائي، التحكيم الإلكتروني./ Cloud Computing; Data Protection Against Theft; Privacy; Cybersecurity; Jurisdiction; Electronic Arbitration
References
أولًا: المراجع العربية:-

  • أحمد جعفر شاوي. (2020). معايير تحديد القانون الواجب التطبيق على عقود الاستهلاك – دراسة مقارنة. مجلة كلية القانون والعلوم السياسية. العدد السادس. الصفحات 209- 2041. https://doi.org/10.61279/vrz1pf56.
  • أحمد شرف الدين (2021). ضوابط حجية المحررات الإلكترونية في الإثبات تعليق على تحديثات اللائحة التنفيذية لقانون التوقيع الإلكتروني في ضوء أحكام محكمة النقض. المجلة الدولية للفقه والقضاء والتشريع. مجلد 2. عدد 1. الصفحات 94 –
  • إيهاب محمد سعيد محمود عويضة العماوي. (2022). القانون الواجب التطبيق على عقود التجارة الدولية. المجلة القانونية. مجلد 14. عدد 6. الصفحات 1913-1966. https://doi.org/10.21608/jlaw.2022.269930.
  • سيد أحمد محمود. (2024). حماية البيانات الشخصية الرقمية وفقًا لأحكام القانون المصري رقم 151 لسنة 2020 (حماية البيانات الشخصية المعالجة إلكترونيًّا) بين الواقع والمأمول. مجلة العلوم القانونية والاقتصادية. مجلد 66. عدد 1. الصفحات 1439-1482. doi: 10.21608/jelc.2024.341026
  • شرف خالد إبراهيم. (2022). اتفاق التحكيم الدولي المبرم من خلال التطبيقات الإلكترونية: التعليق على قضية "سناب شات" أمام المحاكم الكويتية. جامعة الكويت - مجلس النشر العلمي. مجلد 46. عدد 4. الصفحات 115 –
  • صفاء شكور عباس. (2020). التنظيم القانوني للعقود المركبة في القانون المدني. مجلة الدراسات المستدامة. مجلد 2. عدد 1. الصفحات 215-230.
  • فاطمة الزهراء رباح، بشرى عمور. دور المحكم في تحديد القانون الواجب التطبيق على موضوع النزاع. دفاتر البحوث العلمية. مجلد 11، عدد 1. الصفحات 355-373.
https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/221872.

  • لجنة الأمم المتحدة للقانون التجاري الدولي (الدورة الثالثة والخمسون). (2020). الدليل القانوني إلى الصكوك القانونية الموحدة في مجال العقود التجارية الدولية (مع التركيز على البيع) - مذكرة من الأمانة. ص 9. ومتاح من خلال الرابط التالي:
https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/v20/011/76/pdf/v2001176.pdf.

وتم الاطلاع عليه بتاريخ: 6/7/2025.

  • مجلس حقوق الإنسان. (2018). تقرير المفوّض السامي للأمم المتحدة حول "الحق في الخصوصية في عصر الرقمنة" (A/HRC/39/29). للأمم المتحدة. ومتاح من خلال الرابط التالي: https://docs.un.org/ar/A/HRC/39/29. وتم الاطلاع عليه بتاريخ 5/7/2025.
  • محمد عبدالقادر حفني الخطيب. (2024). حرية الأطراف في اختيار القانون الواجب التطبيق على منازعات عقود الوكالة التجارية الدولية. مجلة البحوث القانونية والاقتصادية، تصدر عن کلية الحقوق ـ جامعة المنصورة. مجلد 14، عدد 87. الصفحات 1-48.
https://doi.org/10.21608/mjle.2024.343026.

  • محمد محمود على. (2022). تنازع القوانين في مجال إنفاذ اتفاقات التسوية التجارية الدولية طبقاً لمعاهدة سنغافورة للوساطة 2018. المجلة الدولية للفقه والقضاء والتشريع. مجلد 3. عدد 1. الصفحات 1 –
  • الهيئة العامة للاتصالات وتقنية المعلومات. والمتاح من خلال الرابط التالي: https://citra.gov.kw/sites/ar/Pages/ServiceDetails.aspx?SrvcID=93. وتم الاطلاع عليه بتاريخ 15/5/2025.
  • يوسف حامد الياقوت & شيخة طراد الطراد. (2025). تنفيذ حكم التحكيم الإلكتروني وفقًا لقانون المرافعات الكويتي بين الواقع والمأمول: دراسة تحليلية نقدية مقارنة. مجلة العلوم القانونية والاقتصادية. مجلد 67. عدد 1. الصفحات 315-425. doi: 10.21608/jelc.2025.410573.
ثانيًا: المراجع الأجنبية:

  • Sundararajan, G. Liu, M. Starke, R. K. Moorthy & C. Irwin. (2024). Networked Microgrid Ownership, Data, and Control Implications: Challenges and Open Questions. 2024 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). Seattle, WA, USA. PP 1-5. doi: 10.1109/PESGM51994.2024.10688903.
  • Adebola Folorunso, Olufunbi Babalola, Chineme Edgar Nwatu & Adebisi Adedoyin. (2024). A comprehensive model for ensuring data compliance in cloud computing environment. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. Vol 24. Is 2. PP 1983–1995. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.2.3514.
  • Alugoju N. R. (2024). Data Protection in the Cloud: Ensuring Security and Compliance for Organizational Data. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. Vol 12. Is 12. PP 1590–1596. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.66087.
  • Anil Kumar Reddy Avula. (2024). Understanding Cloud Computing: How Data Storage Works in the Cloud. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. Vol. 6. Is 6. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.33472.
  • Anithakumari S., Chandrasekaran K. (2017). Negotiation and Monitoring of Service Level Agreements in Cloud Computing Services. In: Satapathy S., Bhateja V., Joshi A. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Singapore. Vol 469. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1678-3_62.
  • Antu A. D., Kumar A., Kelley R. & Xie B. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Cloud Storage Options for Diverse Application Requirements. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing. PP 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96326-2_6.
  • Ashwini Kumar. (2023). The Digital Personal Data Protection Bill 2022 in Contrast with the EU General Data Protection Regulation: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. Voll 5. Is 2. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.2534.
  • AVSIYEVYCH A. (2024). PROSPECTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs Kogo Derzhavnogo Universytety Vnutrishnikh Sprav. Vol 1. PP 114–117. https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2023-5-114-117.
  • Bala Akhileswar, A., Kumar Chelluboyina, Y., Vardhan Boya, H., Rao, K. V. & Siva Krishna C. N. (2024). An Analysis of Managing the Cloud: Obstacles and Solutions for Efficient Administration and Protection. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). Vol 9. Is 8. PP 2537–2544. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24aug1487.
  • Berman P. S. (2018). Legal Jurisdiction and the Deterritorialization of Data. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3134782.
  • Bradford L., Aboy M. & Liddell K. (2021). Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. Vol 8. Is 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab007.
  • Byali R., Jyothi Ms. & Shekadar M. C. (2022). Design and Analysis of Cloud Data’s Multi-Layer Security Protection. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. Vol 3. Is 8. PP 173–175. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.2022.3.8.5.
  • Chakraborty A. (2014). The Conflicting Economic Views Emerging from the Microsoft Antitrust Case: Literature Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2373708.
  • Chawki M. (2024). An effective cloud computing model enhancing privacy in cloud computing. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective. Vol 33. Is 6. PP 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2024.2307637.
  • Choi Y. B. (2021). Organizational Cyber Data Breach Analysis of Facebook, Equifax, and Uber Cases. International Journal of Cyber Research and Education (IJCRE). Vol 3. Is 1. PP 58-64. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCRE.2021010106.
  • Dayanim Behnam & George Edward (2018). Data breach litigation and regulatory enforcement: A survey of our present and how to prepare for the future. In the Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal. Vol 1. Is 4. P 301. https://doi.org/10.69554/JJSA8822..
  • Dharga Panduranga Kolla. (2024). Automating Real-Time Compliance Data Collection in Cloud Architectures: A Technical Deep Dive. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. Vol 6. Is 6. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.33599.
  • Dobrilă M.-C. (2021). Aspecte teoretice şi jurisprudenţiale privind respectarea GDPR la încheierea şi executarea unui contract. ANALELE ȘTIINŢIFICE ALE UNIVERSITĂŢII „ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA” DIN IAȘI (SERIE NOUĂ). ȘTIINŢE JURIDICE. Vol 67. Is 2. PP 93–106. https://doi.org/10.47743/jss-2021-67-4-6.
  • Drechsler L. & Kamara I. (2022). "Chapter 13: Essential equivalence as a benchmark for international data transfers after Schrems II". In Research Handbook on EU Data Protection Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371682.00022.
  • Dritsas E. & Trigka M. (2025). A Survey on the Applications of Cloud Computing in the Industrial Internet of Things. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. Vol 9. Is 2. PP 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc9020044.
  • Eldar O. & Rauterberg G. V. (2022). Is Corporate Law Nonpartisan? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4125863.
  • Eswari R., Vamshi A., & Sultan M. S. (2023). An Efficient Data Storage Technique for User Files in Cloud. In 2023 International Conference on Quantum Technologies, Communications, Computing, Hardware and Embedded Systems Security (iQ-CCHESS). IEEE. PP 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/iq-cchess56596.2023.10391609.
  • Spanca & A. Salihu. (2024). Unveiling the Consequences of Data Breaches: Risks, Impacts, and Mitigation in the Digital Age. 2024 International Conference on Electrical, Communication and Computer Engineering (ICECCE). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. PP 1-8. doi: 10.1109/ICECCE63537.2024.10823432.
  • Megala & S. Prabu. (2021). A Comprehensive Analysis On Efficient Multimedia Storage Mechanism In Public Cloud Environment With Secured Access. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT). Vol 12. Is 5. PP 1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i5.1794.
  • Gao H. (2023). Data Sovereignty and Trade Agreements. In Data Sovereignty. Oxford University Press, New York. PP 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197582794.003.0010.
  • Gavrila S. P. (2024). CHALLENGES AND DIRECTIONS OF THE EUROPEAN REGULATION OF MEDIATION IN CROSS-BORDER DISPUTES. SWS International Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES – ISCSS. Vol 11. PP 115–126. https://doi.org/10.35603/sws.iscss.2024/vs02/04.
  • Hammer A., Ohlig M., Geus J. & Freiling F. (2023). A Functional Classification of Forensic Access to Storage and its Legal Implications. Digital Threats: Research and Practice. Vol 4. Is 3. PP 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3609231.
  • Helmiawan M. A. & Fadil I. (2020). PRIVATE CLOUD STORAGE IN RURAL’S MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEM USING ROADMAP FOR CLOUD COMPUTING ADOPTION (ROCCA). INTERNAL (Information System Journal). Vol 2. Is 2. PP 172–183. https://doi.org/10.32627/internal.v2i2.85.
  • Hongtao Liu. (2024). Optimization and performance improvement of distributed data storage in hybrid storage systems. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences. Vol 13. Is 1. PP 459–467. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.1.0443.
  • Hussein B. F., & Mahmoud I. A. (2024). The Legal Implications of a Food Service Provider’s Breach of Obligations a Comparative Study. Journal of Ecohumanism. Vol 3. Is 8. PP 9967-9981. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5609.
  • B K & T. J. (2022). Data Storage Security and Privacy in Cloud Computing. 2022 IEEE International Conference for Women in Innovation, Technology & Entrepreneurship (ICWITE), Bangalore, India. PP 1-10. doi: 10.1109/ICWITE57052.2022.10176237.
  • Jarjis Khalaf Saleh F. & Omar Al Amr S. (2023). Conflict of Legislative and Judicial Jurisdiction in Electronic Contract Disputes - A Comparative Study. Alanya International Congress of Social Sciences. Rimar Academy. PP 101–114. https://doi.org/10.47832/alanyacongress2-10.
  • Jennifer Daskal. (2018). Microsoft Ireland, the CLOUD Act, and International Lawmaking 2.0. Stanford Law Review Online. Vol 71. Available through the following link: https://tinyurl.com/26bue4mo. It was viewed on: 28/5/2025.
  • Jiang Y., Li J., Zhang L., Jia Z., Liu W. & Liu C. (2024). Design and Implementation of Secure Cloud Storage System based on Hybrid Cryptographic Algorithm. 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Algorithms for Computational Intelligence Systems (IACIS). IEEE. PP 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/iacis61494.2024.10721716.
  • Judgment of the Court of 30 November 1976. Handelskwekerij G. J. Bier BV v Mines de potasse d'Alsace SA. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Gerechtshof 's-Gravenhage - Netherlands. Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of Judgment - Article 5 (3) (liability in tort, delict or quasi-delict). Case 21-76. Available through the following link: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?&num=21/76. It was accessed on 1/10/2025.
  • Kaile Sun. (2024). Challenges and Solutions in Cloud Computing Security and Privacy Protection. Journal of Electronics and Information Science. Vol. 9. Is 1. PP 62-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/10.23977/jeis.2024.090110.
  • Karagiannis C. & Vergidis K. (2021). Digital Evidence and Cloud Forensics: Contemporary Legal Challenges and the Power of Disposal. Information. Vol 12. Is 5. PP 181(1-16). https://doi.org/10.3390/info12050181.
  • Khan A.Q., Matskin M., Prodan R. et al. (2024). Cloud storage cost: a taxonomy and survey. World Wide Web. Vol 27. article number 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-024-01273-4.
  • Khan S., Kabanov I., Hua Y. & Madnick S. (2022). A Systematic Analysis of the Capital One Data Breach: Critical Lessons Learned. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security. Vol 26. Iss 1. PP 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546068.
  • Kheira A. (2024). Electronic Arbitration as an Alternative Mechanism for Resolving E-Commerce Disputes. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review. Vol 4. Is 4. P e04292. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n04.pe04292.
  • Krishnan S. & Chen L. (2019). Legal Concerns and Challenges in Cloud Computing. (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1905.10868.
  • Kun E. (2024). Challenges in regulating cloud service providers in EU financial regulation: From operational to systemic risks and examining challenges of the new oversight regime for critical cloud service providers under the Digital Operational Resilience Act. Computer Law & Security Review. Vol 52. P e105931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105931.
  • Limam S, Belalem G. (2016). A self-adaptive conflict resolution with flexible consistency guarantee in the cloud computing. Multiagent and Grid Systems. Vol 12. Is 3. PP 217-238. doi:10.3233/MGS-160251
  • A. Z. Bin Idrus, F. D. A. Rahman, O. O. Khalifa & N. M. Yusoff. (2023). Blockchain-based Security for Cloud Data Storage. 2023 IEEE 9th International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. PP 73-77. Doi: 10.1109/ICSIMA59853.2023.10373457.
  • Barati & O. Rana. (2022). Tracking GDPR Compliance in Cloud-Based Service Delivery. in IEEE Transactions on Services Computing. Vol 15. Is 3. PP 1498-1511. doi: 10.1109/TSC.2020.2999559.
  • Harsitha, Lavanya, Manoj Sanikam M. & Mayur Gupta. (2022). A Cloud Storage. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. Vol 2. Is 1. PP 44–52. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-7064.
  • Madhusudhan Dasari sreeramulu. (2024). Analysis of Cloud Computing and Cloud Storage in Mobile Forensics Using the DEMATEL Method. Computer Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol 2. Is 2. PP 33–43. https://doi.org/10.46632/cset/2/2/4.
  • Maha A. Sayal. (2023). Private Storage Cloud for Facilitate the Functions of Organizations. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Engineering. Vol 3. Is 6. PP 43–51. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijitc.36.43.51.
  • Marinescu D. C. (2023). Cloud access and cloud interconnection networks. Cloud Computing Elsevier. PP 175–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-32-385277-7.00013-0.
  • Marinescu D. C. (2023). Cloud data storage. Cloud Computing Elsevier. PP 215–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-32-385277-7.00014-2.
  • Mathai M. K. & Mathew J. (2024). Cloud storage. In Research Advances in Network Technologies. 1st Edition. PP 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003433958-6.
  • Mayorova L. A. (2022). Liability clauses in civil law. Siberian Law Herald. Vol 2022. Is 2. PP 75–79. https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2022.2.75.
  • Meglio M. (2020). Embracing Insecurity: Harm Reduction Through a No-Fault Approach to Consumer Data Breach Litigation. Boston College Law Review. Vol 61. Is 3. PP 1223-1269.
  • Merkin KC R., Saintier S. & Poole J. (2023). 13. Breach of contract. In Poole’s Casebook on Contract Law. Oxford University Press. PP 638–687. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192885081.003.0013.
  • Mollakuqe E., Hamdiu E., Fishekqiu N. S., Jakupi S. & Qarkaxhija J. (2024). Comparison of cloud storage in terms of privacy and personal data - Sync, pCloud, IceDrive and Egnyte. Open Research Europe. (version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review). 4. 128. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16631.1.
  • Kushwaha, P. Roguski and B. W. Watson. (2020). Up in the Air: Ensuring Government Data Sovereignty in the Cloud. 2020 12th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon). Estonia. PP 43-61. doi: 10.23919/CyCon49761.2020.9131718.
  • Nanda A. K., Sharma A., Augustine P. J., Cyril B. R., Kiran V., & Sampath B. (2024). Securing Cloud Infrastructure in IaaS and PaaS Environments. In P. Goel, H. Pandey, A. Singhal, & S. Agarwal (Eds.), Improving Security, Privacy, and Trust in Cloud Computing. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. PP 1-33. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1431-9.ch001.
  • Nora Ellingsen. (2016). The Microsoft Ireland Case: A Brief Summary. The Lawfare Institute. Available through the following link: https://tinyurl.com/27deccsp. It was viewed on: 13/5/2025.
  • Nordic Public Sector Cloud Computing – a discussion paper. (2012). TemaNord. Nordic Council of Ministers. PP 5-56. https://doi.org/10.6027/tn2011-566.
  • Odun-Ayo I., Ajayi O., Akanle B. & Ahuja R. (2017). An Overview of Data Storage in Cloud Computing. 2017 International Conference on Next Generation Computing and Information Systems (ICNGCIS). IEEE. PP 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/icngcis.2017.9.
  • Paputungan I. V. (2023). Chapter 17- Explainable renegotiation for SLA in cloud-based system. In Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, enabling tools, technologies and applications Institution of Engineering and Technology. PP 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1049/pbpc062e_ch17.
  • Pichonnaz P. (2024). Contractual Limitations of Liability and their Impact on Tort Claims. Journal of European Tort Law. Vol 15. Is 1. PP 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2024-0004.
  • Pimenta Rodrigues G. A., Marques Serrano A. L., Lopes Espiñeira Lemos A. N., Canedo E. D., Mendonça F. L. L. d., de Oliveira Albuquerque R., Sandoval Orozco A. L. & García Villalba L. J. (2024). Understanding Data Breach from a Global Perspective: Incident Visualization and Data Protection Law Review. Data. Vol 9. Is 2. PP 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/data9020027.
  • Pribetic A. I. (2009). Case Note: Opinion Of Advocate General Kokott in Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta SpA) and Others v West Tankers Inc. (Case C-185/07 delivered on 4 September 2008). Transnational Dispute Management. Vol 6. Is 1. Available through the following link: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1396. It was viewed on: 13/5/2025
  • Qazi F., Kwak D., Khan F. G., Ali F., & Khan S. U. (2024). Service Level Agreement in cloud computing: Taxonomy, prospects, and challenges. Internet of Things. Vol 25. P e101126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101126.
  • S. Sree & K. Raja. (2022). A Review on Forensic Investigation Analysis in Cloud Computing Environments," 2022 1st International Conference on Computational Science and Technology (ICCST). CHENNAI, India. PP 1067-1074. doi: 10.1109/ICCST55948.2022.10040384.
  • Rane D., Chourey V., Verma R. & Gupta P. (2022). Consideration of Availability and Reliability in Cloud Computing. In Machine Learning and Optimization Models for Optimization in Cloud. Chapman and Hall/CRC. PP 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003185376-4.
  • Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast). Available through the following link: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2012/1215/oj/eng. It was viewed on: 6/7/2025.
  • Rognstad O.-A. (2024). Data ownership’ ambiguity. In Promoting Sustainable Innovation and the Circular Economy. Routledge. 1st Edition. PP 114–133. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003309093-7.
  • Saini J. S., Saini D. K., Gupta P., Lamba C. S. & Rao G. M. (2022). Cloud Computing: Legal Issues and Provision. Security and Communication Networks. Vol 2022. PP 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2288961.
  • Salunke N. R. (2021). Files Storage & Sharing Platform Using Cloud. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. Vol 9. Is 11. PP 1338–1344. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38994.
  • Salunke N. R. (2021). Files Storage & Sharing Platform Using Cloud. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. Vol 9. Is 11. PP 1338–1344. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38994.
  • Salunke N. R. (2021). Files Storage & Sharing Platform Using Cloud. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. Vol 9. Is 11. PP 1338–1344. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38994.b.
  • Seay C., Washington M. & Watson R. J. (2016). Personal Applications of Clouds. In Encyclopedia of Cloud Computing (Wiley). PP 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118821930.ch42.
  • Seth D., Najana M. & Ranjan P. (2024). Compliance and Regulatory Challenges in Cloud Computing: A Sector-Wise Analysis. International Journal of Global Innovations and Solutions (IJGIS). https://doi.org/10.21428/e90189c8.68b5dea5.
  • Tabatadze T. (2023). The relation of the principle of good faith to the limiting and excluding circumstances of contractual liability. Journal of Contemporary Law. Vol 2. Is 2. PP 170–179. https://doi.org/10.31578/jcl.v2i2.30.
  • Tantowi L. & Wijayanti L. (2023). PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN PENYIMPANAN CLOUD STORAGE PADA DOKUMEN DIGITAL. Shaut Al-Maktabah: Jurnal Perpustakaan, Arsip Dan Dokumentasi. Vol 15. Is 1. PP 118–131. https://doi.org/10.37108/shaut.v15i1.803.
  • Thi Bao Thu Le, Nicolas Anciaux, Sébastien Gilloton, Saliha Lallali, Philippe Pucheral & et al. (2016). Distributed Secure Search in the Personal Cloud. EDBT - 19th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, Mar 2016. Bordeaux. France. PP 652-655. hal-01293409
  • Tippavajjula A., Pappachan P., Squicciarini A. & Such J. (2024). ACCORD: Constraint-driven Mediation of Multi-user Conflicts in Cloud Services. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 (pp. 1039–1042). WWW ’24: The ACM Web Conference 2024. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651244.
  • Vaibhav Kharose, Himanshu Mevada, Yash Ambarle, Tushar Devre & Shatabdi Bhalerao. (2024). A Cloud-based Multimedia Storage Protection System. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. Vol 6. Is 2. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.19320.
  • Vankayalapati R. K. (2025). Public clouds: The pillar of scalability and innovation. The Synergy Between Public and Private Clouds in Hybrid Infrastructure Models: Real-World Case Studies and Best Practices. Deep Science Publishing. PP 32-49. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-81-984306-5-6_3.
  • Varun Garg. (2024). Overcoming Data Loss Challenges: Best Practices for Backfill and Reprocessing in Distributed Data Systems. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. Vol 6. Is 5. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.21547.
  • Zuo & H. Ding. (2020). Research on Digital Copyright Infringement Based on Cloud Computing Environment. 2020 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Application (ICCEA). Guangzhou, China. PP 128-133, doi: 10.1109/ICCEA50009.2020.00034.
  • Zheng, X. Lu, J. Zhai and Y. Zhu. (2023). Reflections on Digital Legislative Management of Privacy under the background of Cloud Service. 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Management and Software Engineering (IMSE). Rome, Italy. PP 100-103, doi: 10.1109/IMSE61332.2023.00027.
  • Zhang Y. (2023). Legal Approach to International Cooperation on Cloud Storage of Personal Information. Technium Social Sciences Journal. Vol 40. Is 1. PP 156–165. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8341.
  • Zuo X. & Ding H. (2020). Research on Digital Copyright Infringement Based on Cloud Computing Environment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol 1607. Is 1. P e012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1607/1/012078.
  • Валентина Троцька. (2022). ПОЗАСУДОВЕ ВРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ СПОРІВ ЗГІДНО З ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКИМ ЗАКОНОДАВСТВОМ ПРО АВТОРСЬКЕ ПРАВО І СУМІЖНІ ПРАВА В ЄДИНОМУ ЦИФРОВОМУ РИНКУ. Теорія і практика інтелектуальної власності. No 1. PP 35–43. https://doi.org/10.33731/12022.258189.
  • 杨健, 王剑 & 杨邓奇. (2014). 版权与数字内容分离的云存储DR M方案. 计算机工程与设计. 年卷 期 7. PP 2330-2334. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7024.2014.07.014.
  • 王哈琴. (2023). 云存储结构模型及云存储架构的比较研究. 内蒙古民族大学学报（自然科学). Vol 2013. Is 6. PP 642-645. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0185.2013.06.008.

 

References:

  • 'ahmad jaefar shawi. (2020). maeayir tahdid alqanun alwajib altatbiq ealaa euqud alaistihlak - dirasat muqaranati. majalat kuliyat alqanun waleulum alsiyasiati. aleadad alsaadisi. alsafahat 209- 2041. https://doi.org/10.61279/vrz1pf56.
  • 'ahmad sharaf aldiyn (2021). dawabit hijiat almuharirat al'iiliktruniat fi al'iithbat taeliq ealaa tahdithat allaayihat altanfidhiat liqanun altawqie al'iiliktrunii fi daw' 'ahkam mahkamat alnaqdu. almajalat alduwaliat lilfiqh walqada' waltashriei. mujalad 2. eadad 1. alsafahat 94 - 103.
  • 'iihab muhamad saeid mahmud euaydat aleamawi. (2022). alqanun alwajib altatbiq ealaa euqud altijarat aldawliati. almajalat alqanuniata. mujalad 14. eadad 6. alsafahat 1913-1966. https://doi.org/10.21608/jlaw.2022.269930.
  • sayid 'ahmad mahmud. (2024). himayat albayanat alshakhsiat alraqamiat wfqan li'ahkam alqanun almisrii raqm 151 lisanat 2020 (himayat albayanat alshakhsiat almuealijat 'ilktrwnyana) bayn alwaqie walmamuli. majalat aleulum alqanuniat waliaiqtisadiati. mujalad 66. eadad 1. alsafahat 1439-1482. doi: 10.21608/jelc.2024.341026
  • sharaf khalid 'iibrahim. (2022). aitifaq altahkim alduwalii almubram min khilal altatbiqat al'iiliktruniati: altaeliq ealaa qadia "snab shati" 'amam almahakim alkuaytiati. jamieat alkuayt - majlis alnashr alealmi. mujalad 46. eadad 4. alsafahat 115 - 165.
  • safa' shakur eabaas. (2020). altanzim alqanuniu lileuqud almurakabat fi alqanun almadanii. majalat aldirasat almustadamati. mujalad 2. eadad 1. alsafahat 215-230.
  • fatimat alzahra' rabah, bushraa eamur. dawr almahkam fi tahdid alqanun alwajib altatbiq ealaa mawdue alnizaei. dafatir albuhuth aleilmiati. mujalad 11, eadad 1. alsafahat 355-373. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/221872.
  • lajnat al'umam almutahidat lilqanun altijarii alduwalii (aldawrat althaalithat walkhamsuna). (2020). aldalil alqanuniu 'iilaa alsukuk alqanuniat almuahadat fi majal aleuqud altijariat alduwalia (mae altarkiz ealaa albayea) - mudhakiratan min al'amanati. s 9. wamutah min khilal alraabit altaali:

https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/v20/011/76/pdf/v2001176.pdf. watama aliatilae ealayh bitarikhi: 6/7/2025.

  • majlis huquq al'iinsani. (2018). taqrir almfwwd alsaami lil'umam almutahidat hawl "alhaqi fi alkhususiat fi easr alraqmanati" (A/HRC/39/29). lil'umam almutahidati. wamutah min khilal alraabit altaali: https://docs.un.org/ar/A/HRC/39/29. watama alatilae ealayh bitarikh 5/7/2025.
  • muhamad abdalqadir hafni alkhatib. (2024). huriyat al'atraf fi aikhtiar alqanun alwajib altatbiq ealaa munazaeat euqud alwikalat altijariat alduwaliati. majalat albuhuth alqanuniat walaiqtisadiati, tasdur ean kliat alhuquq jamieat almansura. mujalad 14, eadad 87. alsafahat 1-48. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjle.2024.343026.
  • muhamad mahmud ealaa. (2022). tanazue alqawanin fi majal 'iinfadh aitifaqat altaswiat altijariat alduwliat tbqaan limueahadat singhafurat lilwisatat 2018. almajalat alduwaliat lilfiqh walqada' waltashriei. mujalad 3. eadad 1. alsafahat 1 - 31.
  • alhayyat aleamat liliatisalat watiqniat almaelumati. walmutah min khilal alraabit altaali:

https://citra.gov.kw/sites/ar/Pages/ServiceDetails.aspx?SrvcID=93. watama aliatilae ealayh bitarikh 15/5/2025.

  • yusif hamid alyaqut & shaykhat taraad altaradi. (2025). tanfidh hukm altahkim al'iiliktrunii wfqan liqanun almurafaeat alkuaytii bayn alwaqie walmamuli: dirasat tahliliatan naqdiatan muqaranata. majalat aleulum alqanuniat waliaqtisadiati. mujalad 67. eadad 1. alsafahat 315-425. doi: 10.21608/jelc.2025.410573.
Statistics
Article View: 44
PDF Download: 8