Evaluation of Anchorage Loss during Canine Retraction Using Micro-Implant as Temporary Anchorage Device (A Split-Mouth Comparative study)
Abou-Elmaaty, N., Ibrahim, S., Mohamed, M. (2020). Evaluation of Anchorage Loss during Canine Retraction Using Micro-Implant as Temporary Anchorage Device (A Split-Mouth Comparative study). EKB Journal Management System, 7(3-A), 459-466. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2020.13240.1156
Nagwa A. Abou-Elmaaty; Samir A. Ibrahim; Maha M. Mohamed. "Evaluation of Anchorage Loss during Canine Retraction Using Micro-Implant as Temporary Anchorage Device (A Split-Mouth Comparative study)". EKB Journal Management System, 7, 3-A, 2020, 459-466. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2020.13240.1156
Abou-Elmaaty, N., Ibrahim, S., Mohamed, M. (2020). 'Evaluation of Anchorage Loss during Canine Retraction Using Micro-Implant as Temporary Anchorage Device (A Split-Mouth Comparative study)', EKB Journal Management System, 7(3-A), pp. 459-466. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2020.13240.1156
Abou-Elmaaty, N., Ibrahim, S., Mohamed, M. Evaluation of Anchorage Loss during Canine Retraction Using Micro-Implant as Temporary Anchorage Device (A Split-Mouth Comparative study). EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 7(3-A): 459-466. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2020.13240.1156

Evaluation of Anchorage Loss during Canine Retraction Using Micro-Implant as Temporary Anchorage Device (A Split-Mouth Comparative study)

Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls
Article 3, Volume 7, 3-A, July 2020, Page 459-466  XML PDF (783.17 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2020.13240.1156
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Nagwa A. Abou-Elmaaty email 1; Samir A. Ibrahim2; Maha M. Mohamed3
1BDS 2012, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine. Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
2Professor of Orthodontics, Orthodontic department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
3Lecturer of Orthodontics, Orthodontic department - Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Purpose: Anchorage control is considered a keystone for successful orthodontic treatment so this study was to compare and measure the amount of anchorage loss during canine retraction by using micro-implant as a temporary anchorage device. Material and methods: A sample of 10 patients with an age range from 13 to 18 years, requiring extraction of first premolars was selected for this study. A randomized split-mouth study design was used. A nickel titanium closed-coil spring was used for canine retraction on micro-implants placed distal to the upper first permanent molar. In the right side upper first permenant molar was tied back to micro-implant using ligature wire. Amount of anchorage loss was measured by three dimension digital scanner. Results: there was non-significant anchorage loss when using micro-implant as a temporary anchorage device, and was no significantly different from right and left side. Conclusion: There was non-significant anchorage loss when using micro-implant, and the anchorage loss, molar and canine rotation, distance of canine distalization between the right side (tie back) side and the left side was insignificantly different.
Keywords
Anchorage Loss; Micro-Implant; Canine Retraction
Statistics
Article View: 197
PDF Download: 300