اختلاف نمط ممارسة الأنشطة الإلکترونية ضمن بيئة التعلم المعکوس وأثره في تنمية الأداء التقني والثقة بالنفس لدى طلاب تکنولوجيا التعليم. The Difference of the Electronic Activities Pattern within the flipped Learning Environment and its Effect on Developing Technical Performance and Self-confidence among Educational Technology Department Students | ||||
| التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) | ||||
| Article 1, Volume 39, 186ج3, April 2020, Page 11-63 PDF (765.87 K) | ||||
| Document Type: بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2020.102104 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| هويدا سعيد عبد الحميد السيد عبدالحميد | ||||
| جامعةعين شمس | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| هدف البحث إلى التعرف على اثر اختلاف نمط ممارسة الأنشطة الإلکترونية (فردي/ تعاوني) ضمن بيئة التعلم المعکوس في تنمية الأداء التقني والثقة بالنفس لدى طلاب تکنولوجيا التعليم، تکونت مجموعة البحث من (60) طالب وطالبة بالفرقة الرابعة تکنولوجيا التعليم – کلية التربية النوعية – جامعة عين شمس، تم تقسيمهم إلى مجموعتين قوام کل مجموعة (30) طالب، تم تصميم الأنشطة التعليمية وفق نموذج التصميم العام، وقد استمرت تجربة البحث ثلاث أسابيع متتالية، حيث نفذت مجموعتي البحث الأنشطة التعليمية بنمطيها عبر المجتمع الافتراضي Schoology،وداخل القاعة الدراسية، وقد تم تطبيق أدوات البحث وهي اختبار تحصيلي، بطاقة ملاحظة، مقياس الثقة بالنفس، ثم تم رصد النتائج ومعالجتها احصائيًا، وجاءت النتائج لصالح نمط ممارسة النشاط الفردي . The Study aimed to identify the effect of the different pattern of electronic activities (individual / cooperative) within the Flipped learning environment in developing technical performance and self-confidence among students of educational technology, the research group consisted of (60) students in the fourth year of educational technology - the Faculty of Specific Education - University Ain Shams, they were divided into two groups, the strength of each group (30) students, educational activities were designed according to the general design model, and the research experiment lasted for three consecutive weeks, as the two research groups carried out educational activities with their two modules through the Schoology virtual community, and the research tools were applied and they are Enumeration test Next, a note card, a measure of self-confidence, then the results were monitored and statistically processed, and the results came in favor of a pattern of individual activity in developing technical performance and self-confidence among students of educational technology. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| التعلم المعکوس; الأنشطة الإلکترونية; الأداء التقني; الثقة بالنفس. Flipped learning؛ e-activities؛ technical performance؛ self-confidence | ||||
| References | ||||
1) المراجع العربيةهنداوى, أسامة سعید على ( ٢٠١٤ ). أثر التفاعل بین نمط وتوقیت ممارسةالأنشطة فى وحدة تعلیمیة الکترونیة حول إدراک الألغاز والخدع البصریة الرقمیة على مهارات التمییز البصری ومستوى قراءة البصریات لدى تلامیذ الصف الخامس الابتدائی, دراسات عربیة فى التربیة وعلم النفس, 2(53), 17-70. شحاتة, حسن سید و النجار, زینب (2003). معجم المصطلحات التربویة والنفسیة. الدار المصریة اللبنانیة
شحاته, حسن سید. ( ٢٠٠٠ ). النشاط المدرسی. الدار المصریة اللبنانیة. الوکیل, حلمی حسن و المفتی, محمد أحمد (1996). أسس بناء المناهج وتنظیماتها. دار المیسرة. سلیمان, سناء محمد (2005) التعلم التعاونی (أسسه- استراتیجیاته- تطبیقاته). عالم الکتب. أبو علام, العادل (1987). مقیاس الثقة بالنفس عند الطالبات. على الصباح للنشر والتوزیع. زیتون, عایش محمود (2007). النظریة البنائیة واستراتیجیات تدریس العلوم. دار الشروق. الجزار, عبد اللطیف بن الصفی (2000). أثر تغییر عدد الطالبات المعلمات فی مجموعة التعلم التعاونی وتأمل نمط التعلم على اکتساب أسس التصمیم التعلیمی وتطبیقها فی تطویر الدروس متعددة الوسائط, تکنولوجیا التعلیم- سلسلة دراسات وبحوث محکمة, مج (10), الکتاب الرابع, الجمعیة المصریة لتکنولوجیا التعلیم, القاهرة, عالم الکتب. القریطی, عبد المطلب أمین (2001). سیکولوجیة ذوی الاحتیاجات الخاصة وتربیتهم(ط3). دار الفکر العربی. العنزی, فریح (2000). المکونات الفرعیة للثقة بالنفس والخجل, دراسة ارتباطیة. مجلة العلوم الاجتماعیة, جامعة الکویت, مجلس النشر العلمی, 29(3), 47-77. أبوحطب, فؤاد و أحمد, آمال صادق (1984): علم النفس التربوی(ط3). مکتبة الأنجلو المصریة.
أبو مسلم, مایسة فاضل (2012). التنمیة المهنیة وضمان جودة التعلیم, مجلة بحوث ودراسات جودة التعلیم, الهیئة القومیة لضمان الجودة والاعتماد, (1), 263- 280. خمیس, محمد عطیة (2003). عملیات تکنولوجیا التعلیم. دار الکلمة. خمیس, محمد عطیة (2014). النظریة والبحث التربوی فی تکنولوجیا التعلیم. دار السحاب للنشر والتوزیع. محمد مصطفى الدیب & صلاح عبدالسمیع باشا (2002): الثقة بالنفس ومستوى التحصیل الدراسی عند طلاب وطالبات القسم العلمی والأدبی بالمرحلة الثانویة, مجلة کلیة التربیة جامعة الأزهر. المرکز الوطنی للتعلم الإلکترونی والتعلیم عن بعد (2015, 2- 5 مارس). المؤتمر الدولی الرابع للتعلم الإلکترونی والتعلیم عن بعد -تعلم مبتکر: لمستقبل واعد, السعودیة. 2) المراجع العربية مترجمة Translation of the Arabic ReferencesHindawy, O.(2014). The effect of interaction between the pattern and the time of practising activities in an electronic learning unit on realising digital visual puzzles and tricks on the skills of visual excellence and the level of visual reading among the fifth primary grade pupils, Arab studies in education and psychology, 2 (53), 17-70.
Shehata, H.& Al-Najar, Z. (2003) Dictionary of educational and psychological terms. Egyptian-Lebanese House, https://novoeu.com/saskatchewan/pdf-35.php
Shehata, H. (2000). School activity. The Egyptian-Lebanese house.
Al Wakeil. H.& Al Mofty, Mز(1996). Basics of constructing and organising curriculum. Dar Al-Masera.
Soliman, S.(2005). Collaborative learning (its foundations, strategies, applications). The World of Books.
Abo-Allam, Al-Adel (1987). Self-confidence scale among female students. Ali Al-Sabah for publication and distribution.
Zitoun, Aysh Mahmoud(2007). Constructive theory and strategies of teaching science. Dar Al-Shorouk.
Al-Jazar, Abd Ellatif Bin Al-Safi (2000). The impact of changing the number of female student-teachers in the collaborative learning group and the Mediation of the pattern of learning on the basis of learning design and its application in the development of multimedia lessons, technology learning - a series of refereed studies and research, Vol. (10), the fourth book, the Egyptian Society for Learning Technology, Cairo, The World of Books.
Al-Qurtoby, Abdel-Moteleb Ameen (2001). Psychology of people with special needs and their education. Dar Alfikr Al Araby.
Al-Anzy, Fareh (2000). Sub-components of self-confidence and shyness, a correlational study. The Educational Journal, Univrsity of Kwuit, Scientific Publishing Council, 29 (3), 47-77.
Abo-Hatab, F.& Ahmed, A.(1984): Educational psychology(3rded.). The Egyptian Anglo library.
Abo-Muslim, M.(2012). Professional development and quality assurance of education, Journal of Research and Studies of The Quality of education, The National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation, (1), 263-280.
Khamees, M.(2003). Learning technology processes. Dar Al-Kalemah.
Khamees, M.(2014). Theory and educational research in the technology of education. Al-Sahab Publishing and Distribution House.
Al-Deeb, M.& Abdel-Samea Basha, S. (2002): Self-confidence and the level of academic achievement among the students of the scientific and literature department in the secondary level, Journal of Education, Al-Azhar University.
National Center for E-Learning and Distance Learning (2015, March 2-5). The 4th International Conference on E-Learning and Distance Learning - creative education: For a Promising Future, Saudi Arabia
3) المراجع الأجنبية:Abdelhalim, S. M. (2018). An Integrative Strategy Based on Incorporating Flipped Model of Instruction and Self-Reflection Practices to Enhance EFL Students' Listening Comprehension and Self-Regulated Learning. Online Submission.
Atayero, A. A., & Feyisetan, O. (2011). Security issues in cloud computing: The potentials of homomorphic encryption. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(10), 546-552.
Andrew, P. (2012). The Learning Activity Management System, Atherton, J. (2009). Learning and teaching: Deep and surface Learning, (Online). Available at: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/deepsurf.htm.
Arbaugh, J. B., Godfrey, M. R., Johnson, M., Pollack, B. L., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 71-87.
Artino Jr, A. R. (2009). Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success?. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 117-125.
Atherton, S., Antley, A., Evans, N., Cernis, E., Lister, R., Dunn, G., ... & Freeman, D. (2016). Self-confidence and paranoia: an experimental study using an immersive virtual reality social situation. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy, 44(1), 56-64.
Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J. (2001). Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: Lessons from the field. The journal of environmental education, 32(4), 8-15.
Bekele, T. A., & Menchaca, M. P. (2008). Research on Internet-supported learning: A review. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(4), 373.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the meeting of American Society of Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA. (Online). Available at: http://dts.drake.edu/wp-.
Boling, N, Carol, (2015). Which Method Individual Learning Cooperatives, Learning or Interactive Multimedia Best Enhances Lecture- Based Distance Education, Diss- Abs.int 57 11).
Bonser, S. P., de Permentier, P., Green, J., Velan, G. M., Adam, P., & Kumar, R. K. (2013). Engaging students by emphasising botanical concepts over techniques: innovative practical exercises using virtual microscopy. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 123-127.
Brame, C. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.
Burleson, W., Ganz, A., & Harris, I. (2018). Educational innovations in multimedia systems. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 21–31.
Caffarella, R. S., & Daffron, S. R. (2013). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
Campeau, D., Higgins, C., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
Charles, C. (2014). Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. (Online). Available at: https://www.ydae.purdue.edu/lct/HBCU/documents/Active_Learning_Creating_Excitem ent_in_the_Classroom.pdf.
Chen, C. F. (2014) The study on Scrom-Based adaptive learning model for the Learning Management System designed,” Unpublished education dissertation, National Taichung Teachers College.
Cherry, K. (2016,): How do psychologists define self-esteem? (Online). Available at:
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-esteem-2795868.
Danny Mareco (2017): Technology In Education, (Online). Available at: www.securedgenetworks.com.
Edith Galy, Clara Downey, and Jennie Johnson (2019): The Effect of Using E-Learning Tools in Online and Campus-based Classrooms on Student Performance, Journal of Information Technology Education, 10,209-230.
Educause. (2012). 7 things you should know about flipped classrooms. (Online). Available at: http://www. educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-flipped-lassrooms.
Green, G. (2012). The Flipped Classroom and School Approach: Clintondale High School. Presented at the annual Building Learning Communities Education Conference, Boston, MA. (Online). Available at:
http://2012.blcconference.com/documents/flipped-classroom-school- approach.pdf
Hoskins, B., & Crick, R. D. (2018): Competerices for learning to learn and active citizenship: different currencies or two sides of the same coin? European Journal of education,45(1),121-137.
Johnson, L. W., & Renner, J. D. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement (doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Karla, D. (2013). The language teacher and students’ motivation: Let’s use different types of activities in the classroom, Encuentro22, 2013, ISSN 1989-0796, 29-37. (Online). Available at: www.encuentrojournal.org/.../Del%20Carpio_Motivatio.
Kristen Moran & Amy Milsom (2015). The Flipped Classroom in Counselor Education, Counselor Education & Supervision • March, 54.
Lazar Stosic (2017): the importance of using technology in learning, www.researchgate.net.
Lee, J., Lim, C., &Kim, H (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, (2) 427–453, April.
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transac-tions on Education, 56, 430–435.
Michael Brückner (2018): the importance of using technology in learning, www.researchgate.net.
Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9, 85–87.
Nilson, L., (2013): Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons 86- 176. ISBN: 9780470401040.
Nilsson, L. (2013). Flipping your classroom: What does it mean? Power Point presented at the Office of Teaching Effectiveness and Innovation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Nyiayu Fahriza, Didi Suryadi& Turmudi Fuadiah (2019): Teaching and Learning Activities in Classroom and Their Impact on Student Misunderstanding, International Journal of Instruction 12(1):407-424.
Oney, E., & Oksuzoglu-Guven, G. (2015). Confidence: A critical review of the literature and an alternative perspective for general and specific self-confidence. Psychological Reports, 116, 149-163.
Osborn, D., & Costas, L. (2013). Role-playing in counselor student development. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 8, 92–103.
Parry, Andrew (2015). The Learning Activity Management System, 4Th Annual National VLE Conference-21 June 2004, University of Bristol Learning Technology Support Service.
Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., Boswell, W. R., Schroeder, A. N., & Stine-Cheyne, K. J. (2019). Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 526-544.
Peter Sommerauer & Oliver Müller (2018): Augmented Reality for Teaching and Learning – A Literature Review on Theoretical and Empirical Foundations Research paper, Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL),: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2018_rp
Pulakos, E. D., & O’Leary, R. S. (2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 146-164.
Sadia Shaukat & Mehwish Bashir (2016): University Students’ Academic Confidence: Comparison between Social Sciences and Natural Science Disciplines, Journal of Elementary Education,25 (2,113-123.
Sanders, P., Putwain, D. & Fuente, L. J. (2013). Relationship between undergraduate student confidence approach to learning and academic performance: the role of gender, Revista de sicodidactica, 18 (2).403-420.
Sandra, S. & Ruppert, C. (2006). Factor affecting students’ quality of academic performance: Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 24 (2), 1-4.
Stankov, L. & Lee, J. (2014). Quest for the best non-cognitive predictor of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 34, 1-8.
Thomas Edison (2018): Technology In Education, www.brookings.edu.
Vygotskyii, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Online). Available at: https://books.google.com.eg/books?id=RxjjUefze_oC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ar#v=onepage&q&f=false
Zhonggen, Y. & Guifang, W. (2016). Academic Achievments and satisfaction of the clicker- Aided Flipped Business English Writing class, Educational Technology& Society, (19) 2, 298-312.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 374 PDF Download: 1,608 |
||||
