EFERTILIZER APPLICATOR EVALUATION USING THE RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 1, Volume 28, Issue 4, October 2011, Page 759-781 PDF (951.26 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2011.102561 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| Z. Ebrahim Ismail | ||||
| Prof. of power technology and farm machinery, Agric. Eng. Dept., Mansoura University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| During the last decade, a great deal of attention gave to reclaim new lands (desert lands) and grow these lands by vegetable crops whereas these crops are considered to be high income in short rotation. Further, increase in vegetables production by increasing the yield per unit area is required by controlling the amount of fertilizer application. The fertilizer machine used in experiments is a banded type applicator consisting of a fertilizing hopper, metering device, agitator unit, fertilizer tubes, forming profile unit and transmission system. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize the operating (peripheral speed of the auger, the gate area levels and auger volume) and constructional-related variables (fertilizer application rate). The design in this study is a Central Composite Design "CCD" by which it studied the influence of three factors in 15 runs at which three levels for each independent variable. These levels were coded "-1"; "0" and "+1" respectively. The design is to be run in a single block, to provide protection against the effects of turning variables, the order of experimental has been fully randomized. The optimum levels of the auger peripheral speed "As", auger volumetric capacity "Av" and gate area "Ga" for three different fertilizer types are very close and they are in good agreement. For Super phosphate as example there were 5 m/s, 45 cm3 and 40 cm2 respectively. The highest value of discharge rate for Urea is 159.6 kg/h that obtained at orifice gate area of 48 cm2, auger volume of 50 cm3 and feeding shaft rotational speed of 10 m/s. Increasing the gate area from 16 to 48 cm2 increases the volumetric efficiency from 64.9 % to 79.0 %; from 68.6 to 79.7, and from 39.4 % to 51.2 % for Urea, Nitrate and Super-phosphate respectively. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Response Surface Methodology (RSM); band spreader; application rate; fertilizing hopper; metering device; agitator unit; forming profile unit; auger shaft speed; auger volume; gate area | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Fouda O. A. (2007). A combined unit to prepare the bed of some vegetable crops. Ph.D. Thesis, Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Mansoura Univ.Egypt.
Ismail, Z. E. (2009). Soil response to tillage treatments. Agricultural Mechanization In Asia, Africa and Latin America (AMA). Vol. 40, No. 4 autumn: 9-14.
Ismail, Z. E. (2007). Applied and theoretical fundamentals in seed-bed preparation implements. Part one, 2nd Ed. Published at MansouraUniversity.
Kaplan, J.; J. Chaplin; P.C. Robert (ed.); R.H. Rust (ed.) and W.E. Larson (1999). Unevenness of fertilizer distribution and determination of the application rate. Biosystems and Agr. Eng. Dept., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. of Prec. Agr., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, 19-22 July 1998. Part A and Part B. 943-952.
Kathleen M.C., N. Y. Kamneva and J. Reminga (2004). Response Surface Methodology. CASOS Technical Report, CMU-ISRI-04-136, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, ISRI - Institute for Software Research International, CASOS - Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems.
Kleijnen, J.P.C. (1998). Experimental Design for Sensitivity Analysis, Optimization, and Validation of Simulation Models. In Handbook of simulation: principles, methodology, advances, applications and practice, ed. J. Banks, 173–223. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Neddermeijer, H.G.; G.J van Oortmarssen.; N. Piersma; R. Dekker (2000). A Framework for Response Surface Methodology for Simulation Optimization Models. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference (edited by J.A. Joines, R.R. Barton, K Kang, and P.A. Fishwick), pp. 129-136.
Lee, W.C.; S. Yusof; N.S.A. Hamid and B.S. Baharin (2006). Optimizing conditions for enzymatic clarification of banana juice using response surface methodology (RSM). Journal of Food Engineering, 73, 55–63.
Liu, F.; H. Jia; C. Zhang; H. Zhang; K. Araya; M. Kudoh and H. Kawabe (1998). Improvement of Planosol Solum. Part 9: Fertilizer distributor for subsoil. Hejiang Agricultural Research Institute, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang, China. J. of Agr. Eng. Res. 71: 3, 213-219.
Persson, K.; J. Bangsgaard and J.V. Stafford (1999). Accuracy of fertiliser distribution for Site Specific Fertilisation. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Bygholm, DK-8700 Horsens, Denmark. Precision agriculture 99, Part 2. Papers presented at the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Odense, Denmark, 11-15 July 1999.
Reumers, J.; E. Tijskens and H. Ramon (2003). Experimental characterisation of the tangential and cylindrical fertilizer distribution pattern from a spinning disc: a parameter study. Biosystems Engineering. 86: 3, 327-337.
William, M. Miller; A. Mold; W. Schumann and J.D. Whitney (2004). Evaluating variable rate granular fertilizer technologies in Florida citrus. Proc.Fla.State hort. Soc. 117:161-166. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 147 PDF Download: 193 |
||||
