Agricultural Extension Role of Field Schools in Beheira Governorate | ||||
| Alexandria Science Exchange Journal | ||||
| Article 22, Volume 39, July-September - Serial Number 3, July 2018, Page 226-242 PDF (1.76 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2018.127174 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Samir Abd El-Aziem Osman* 1; Soheir Mohamed Azmy* 1; Mostafa Kamal Hafiz* 1; Mona Amin Mohamed* 2 | ||||
| 1Department of Agricultural Extension Education, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria | ||||
| 2Institute for Agricultural Extension Research and Rural Development, Center for Agricultural Research | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| This research mainly aimed to study the agricultural extension role of field schools in Beheira Governorate . Aquestionnaire through personal interview was to collect data for this from 160 respondent . statistical methods for analyzing research data including : mean , standard deviation , simple coloration coefficient and multiple gradual regression . Important findings could be summarized as follows: 1- Knowledge level was about (15 %) was low , and (59,4 %) has moderate level while (25,6 %)had high level . 2- The results showed that age , education level , exposure to sources of agricultural information , motives of field school admission , land tenure , and participation in extension activities have explained (45,1 %) of the variance in the knowledge level of the respondents . 3- The application level was about (18,8 %) was low and (60 %) has moderate level while (21,2 %) had high level . 4- The results revealed that age , education level , exposure to sources of agricultural information , motives of field school admission , participation in extenstion activation , land tenure and duration of field school enrollment have explained (44,2 %) of the variance in the application level of the respondents . This research mainly aimed to study the agricultural extension role of field schools in Beheira Governorate . Aquestionnaire through personal interview was to collect data for this from 160 respondent . statistical methods for analyzing research data including : mean , standard deviation , simple coloration coefficient and multiple gradual regression . Important findings could be summarized as follows: 1- Knowledge level was about (15 %) was low , and (59,4 %) has moderate level while (25,6 %)had high level . 2- The results showed that age , education level , exposure to sources of agricultural information , motives of field school admission , land tenure , and participation in extension activities have explained (45,1 %) of the variance in the knowledge level of the respondents . 3- The application level was about (18,8 %) was low and (60 %) has moderate level while (21,2 %) had high level . 4- The results revealed that age , education level , exposure to sources of agricultural information , motives of field school admission , participation in extenstion activation , land tenure and duration of field school enrollment have explained (44,2 %) of the variance in the application level of the respondents . | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Field schools; Agricultural extension role; Cognitive and applied level | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 133 PDF Download: 219 |
||||
