MACRO- AND MICRO- ESTHETICS ANALYSIS AMONG EGYPTIAN DENTAL STUDENTS
Osman, A., Shalaby, Y., Elboksomaty, M., El Fawal, N. (2021). MACRO- AND MICRO- ESTHETICS ANALYSIS AMONG EGYPTIAN DENTAL STUDENTS. EKB Journal Management System, 46(Issue 2), 113-120. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.24067.1047
Azza F. Osman; Yousreya A. Shalaby; Maha M. Elboksomaty; Naguib A. El Fawal. "MACRO- AND MICRO- ESTHETICS ANALYSIS AMONG EGYPTIAN DENTAL STUDENTS". EKB Journal Management System, 46, Issue 2, 2021, 113-120. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.24067.1047
Osman, A., Shalaby, Y., Elboksomaty, M., El Fawal, N. (2021). 'MACRO- AND MICRO- ESTHETICS ANALYSIS AMONG EGYPTIAN DENTAL STUDENTS', EKB Journal Management System, 46(Issue 2), pp. 113-120. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.24067.1047
Osman, A., Shalaby, Y., Elboksomaty, M., El Fawal, N. MACRO- AND MICRO- ESTHETICS ANALYSIS AMONG EGYPTIAN DENTAL STUDENTS. EKB Journal Management System, 2021; 46(Issue 2): 113-120. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.24067.1047

MACRO- AND MICRO- ESTHETICS ANALYSIS AMONG EGYPTIAN DENTAL STUDENTS

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 6, Volume 46, Issue 2, August 2021, Page 113-120  XML PDF (1.17 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.24067.1047
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Azza F. Osman* 1; Yousreya A. Shalaby2; Maha M. Elboksomaty3; Naguib A. El Fawal4
1BDS,2006, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Science and Technology, Sudan
2Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
3Assistant Professor of Graphic Designing and Communication, Faculty of Arts, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
4Lecturer of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Abstract
Introduction: Esthetics has great importance in restorative dentistry. It is important to obtain standardized anthropometric data to increase both treatment and esthetic success. A harmonious facial appearance is the most important goal of successful treatment in the esthetic field. It is a steady fact that human faces contrast from each other based on gender, race and ethnicity.
Objectives: This study was aimed to analyze the macro-esthetics of the face and the micro-esthetics of the maxillary anterior teeth to establish the normative values of Egyptian adults and detect possible gender differences.
Materials and methods: The sample consisted of 126 Egyptian dental students (63 males and 63 females) aged (18-24) years. Each student was clinically examined, and then extra-oral and intra-oral photographs were taken. The facial and dental measurements obtained using 2D Adobe Photoshop® CS5 software. Descriptive statistics were applied to the measured parameters and independent samples t-test was performed to assess gender differences.
Results: The results showed that for the linear and vertical facial variables (macro-esthetic appearance) the males have larger facial dimensions than females with highly significant gender differences. While for most of the maxillary anterior teeth proportions (micro-aesthetic appearance), the females have larger proportions than males with statistically significant gender differences.
Conclusion: Based on 2D digital photogrammetry, the macro-esthetic appearance, maxillary anterior teeth measurements and, the micro-esthetic appearance of Egyptian adults were analyzed and data were obtained. In most of the parameters, there was a statistically significant gender difference (P≤0.05).
Keywords
macro-esthetic; micro-esthetic appearance; digital photogrammetry
References
Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients' satisfaction with dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:805-8.

    • Goldstein RE. Esthetic principles for ceramo-metal restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 1977;21:803-22.

    • Van Loenen M, Degrieck J, De Pauw G, Dermaut L. Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. Eur J

    Orthod. 2005;27:258-62.

    • Scott GR, Turner CG. Anthropology of modern human teeth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

    • Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: Facial and dental

    proportions. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:530-8.

    • Lavelle CL. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories.

    Am J Orthod Dentofac. 1972;61:29-37.

    • Gupta L, Gupta K, Hegde V, Pradeep S, Singh P. Embodiment of Macro and Mini aesthetic elements in

    rehabilitation of maxillary anterior teeth with porcelain laminates veneer- A clinical report. Int J Clin Dent.

    2019;12:52-9.

    • Muhammad S, Shahid R, Siddiqui MI. Tooth Morphology and Aesthetics While Smiling in Accordance to

    Golden Proportion. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2016;10:281-4.

    • Collier J. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston;

    1967.

    • Isa Z, Tawfiq O, Noor N, Shamsudheen M, Rijal O. Regression methods to investigate the relationship between

    facial measurements and widths of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:182-8.

    • Becker DG, Tardy ME. Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls. Facial plast surg.

    1999;15:93-9.

    • Dolen UC, Cinar S. Perfect lighting for facial photography in aesthetic surgery: ring light. Aesthetic plast surg.

    2016;40:319-26.

    • Milutinovic J, Zelic K, Nedeljkovic N. Evaluation of Facial Beauty Using Anthropometric Proportions. Sci

    World J. 2014;22:21-8.

    • Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2013.

    • Bishara S, Jakobsen J. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:466-502.

    • Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:244-52.

    • SnowSR.Estheticsmileanalysisofanteriortoothwidth:thegoldenpercentage.JEsthetDent.1999;11:177-84.

    • Sterrett JD, Oliver T, Robinson F, Fortson W, Knaak B, Russell CM. Width/length ratios of normal clinical

    crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26:153-7.

    • Sarver D, Jacobson RS. The aesthetic dentofacial analysis. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34:369-94.

    • RajparaY,ShyagaliT.Anassessmentofsexualdimorphismconcerningfacialasymmetryinestheticallypleasing

    faces. Acta Inform Med. 2015;23:44-8.

    • Zaghloul NM. Sex And Stature Determination From Maxillo-Facial Anthropometry In Adult Egyptian

    Population Sample. EJFSAT. 2019;19:13-28.

    • Muhammad H, Hazem AS. Vertical facial dimensions and indices in adult upper Egyptians. Am J Sci.

    2011;7:785-91.

    • Shah T, Patel M, Nath S, Shobhana K. Determination of sex using cephalo-facial dimensions by discriminant

    function and logistic regression equations. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2015;10:1-5.

    • MohammedDR,Al-SheakliI.PhotographicAnalysisofMacro-AandMicro-AestheticAppearanceinaSample

    of Iraqi Adults With Class I Normal Occlusion. J Bagh Coll Dentistry. 2017;29:153-9.

    • Sawyer AR, See M, Nduka C. 3D Stereophotogrammetry Quantitative Lip Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg.

    2009;33:497-504.

    • Abdel-Rahman RH, Amr SG, Mansoura AK. Sexual Dimorphism of Anthropometric Measurements of

    Periorbital Soft Tissues in a Sample of Egyptian Adults. Mansoura J Forens Med Clin Toxicol. 2019;27:122-9.

    • Al-WazzanKL.TheRelationshipBetweenIntercanthalDimensionsandtheWidthsofMaxillaryAnteriorTeeth.

    J Prosth Dent. 2001;86:608-12.

    • El-SheikhNM,MendilawiLR,KhalifaN.IntercanthalDistanceofaSudanesePopulationSampleasaReference

    for Selection of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Size. Sudan J Med Sci. 2010;5:117-21.

    • OsunwokeEA,DidiaBC,OlotuEJ,YerikemaAH.Astudyonthenormalvaluesofinnercanthal,outercanthal,

    interpupillary distance and head circumference of 3-21 years Ijaws. J Sci Ind Res. 2012;3:441-5.

    • Farag MS, Khattab NM, Refai WM. Validity of Bolton analysis among a group of Egyptian population. Egypt

    Dent J. 2012;58:40-7.

    • Subhashini MH, Prasad MK, Jain AR. Incidence of golden proportion among a target South Indian population.

    J Pharm Res. 2018;12:20-3.

    Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. X-Linked inheritance of tooth size. J Dent Res. 1965;44:439-41.

    • Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Bawankar P. Proximal contact areas of maxillary anterior teeth and their influence on

    interdental papilla. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30:324-9.

    • Stappert CF, Tarnow DP, Chu SJ. Proximal contact areas of the maxillary anterior dentition. Int J Periodont

    Restorat Dent. 2010;30:471-7.

    • Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, Evans DB. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J

    Prosthodont. 1994;7:410-7.

    • Fayyad MA, Jamani KD, Aqrabawi J. Geometric and mathematical proportions and their relations to maxillary

    anterior teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;5:62-70.

    • Mahshid M, Khoshvaghti A, Varshosaz M, Vallaei N. Evaluation of ‘‘Golden Proportion’’ in Individuals with

    an Esthetic Smile. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:185-93.

    • Hassan AZ, Shalaby Y, Osman H, El Tantawi M, Boksomaty M. Facial and dentofacial esthetic analysis in a

    group of Egyptian dental students. Alexandria university; Egyptian Universities Library Consortium;2010.

    • Al-Kaisy N, Garib BT. Analysis of the golden proportion and width/height ratios of maxillary anterior teeth in

    Arab and Kurdish populations. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:981-6.

    • Murthy BS, Ramani N. Evaluation of natural smile: Golden proportion, RED or Golden percentage. J Conserv

    Dent. 2008;11:16-21.

    • Koidou VP, Chatzopoulos GS, Rosenstiel SF. Quantification of facial and smile esthetics. J Prosthet Dent.

    2015;113:198-204.

    Statistics
    Article View: 410
    PDF Download: 1,535