Evaluation of the Retention of Two Different Retention Mechanisms (Nylon Caps and Retention Sil ) in Locators Retained Implant Mandibular Over-Denture. A Randomized Clinical Trial (Rct) | ||||
Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls | ||||
Article 8, Volume 8, 1-C, January 2021, Page 65-70 PDF (517.65 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2020.42237.1294 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Doaa A. Rostom 1; Nora M. Sheta2 | ||||
1Lecturer in Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
2Assistant Professor in Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Purpose: to evaluate the retention of two different retention mechanisms (nylon caps and retention sil) in locators retained implant mandibular overdenture. Materials and methods: This randomized control trail was carried on twelve completely edentulous patients who received two mandibular implant in the cuspid region bilaterally with locators abutments. The patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups at the time of implant loading. Group I: overdentures were pickup with conventional metal housing and nylon caps, Group II: overdentures were pickup with silicone housing retention sil, Forcemeter digital device was used to evaluate the retention of the 2 groups during the follow up period at the time of loading ,three, then six month later. Results: The results revealed that there was a statistical significance difference between the 2 groups with higher retention value for direct pick up metal housing and nylon cap group 1 .While there was no statistical significance difference within each group. Conclusion: Retention sil silicon housing is no longer reliable technique for retaining implant assisted overdenture mandibular. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Locator; Retention Sil; Digital forcemeter | ||||
Statistics Article View: 264 PDF Download: 397 |
||||