THE SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF TUNNELS IN LIQUEFACTION SOIL: A NUMERICAL STUDY | ||||
| Sohag Engineering Journal | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 1, Issue 1, March 2021, Page 49-61 PDF (4.26 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original research articles | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/sej.2021.155856 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ahmed O. Mahmoud  1, 2; Mamdouh A. Kenawi2
| ||||
| 1Civil engineering department – Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada | ||||
| 2Civil engineering department – Faculty of Engineering, Sohag University, 82524, Sohag, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Underground structures can be severely damaged during strong earthquakes. Potential damage to infrastructure due to uplift increases in liquefied soils. Several models can be used to simulate soil liquefaction. This study presents a new numerical method to estimate the overall response of shallow-buried tunnels and to interpret the liquefaction mechanism in saturated sand around the structure under seismic action. The new method stems from the energy-based concept that can be used to compute the excess pore water pressure () and turn it into external forces that would cause the uplift of the underground structure. This study uses a comparative numerical study of implementing the computer code, FLAC on the seismic performance of underground structures using this energy-based approach procedure to estimate pore pressure built-up and evaluate the underground structures' uplift. Moreover, the proposed pore water pressure model is validated against well-documented laboratory data. Also, several study parameters have been considered to investigate the seismic behavior of tunnels. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Tunnel; Liquefaction; Energy model; Excess pore water pressure; Uplift | ||||
| References | ||||
|
[1] Q. Yue and J. Li, “Seismic analysis of utility tunnel considering wave passage effect,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2007. [2] S. C. Chian and K.Tokimatsu, “Floatation of Underground Structures during the Mw9.0 Tōhoku Earthquake of 11th March 2011,” Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 2012. [3] M. Yoshida et al., “Experimental study on mitigation of liquefaction-induced flotation of sewerage manhole by using permeable recycled materials packed in sandbags,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 2008. [4] R. Des-Roches et al., “Overview of the 2010 Haiti earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 27, no. S1, pp. S1-S21, 2011. [5] S. Potter et al., “An overview of the impacts of the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 14, pp. 6–14, 2015. [6] RP. Orense “Soil liquefaction during the 2010 Darfield and 1990 Luzon Earthquakes: A comparative study,” Proceeding of the 9th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society, 14-16 April, Auckland, New Zealand, 2011. [7] A. Yamaguchi et al., “Liquefaction in Tohoku district during the 2011 off the pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 811-829, 2012. [8] G. Kang et al., “Seismic simulation of liquefaction-induced uplift behavior of a hollow cylinder structure buried in shallow ground,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 64, pp. 85–94, 2014. [9] A. A. Javadi et al., “Evaluation of liquefaction-induced lateral displacements using genetic programming,” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 33, no. 4/5, pp. 222-233, 2006. [10] R. A. Green, “Energy-based evaluation and remediation of liquefiable soils,” Ph.D. thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Virginia Polytechnical Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 2001. [11] C. Polito et al., “Effect of load shape on relationship between dissipated energy and residual excess pore pressure generation in cyclic triaxial tests,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1118-1128, 2013. [12] J. Sunitsakul, “The Cyclic Behavior of Silt Soils, Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering,” Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, 2004. [13] M. Karray et al., “Failure mechanisms of underground structures during earthquake: an overview,” 68th Canadian Geotechnical Conference and 7th Canadian Permafrost Conference (Geo-Québec), Québec, Canada, 2015. [14] Itasca Consulting Group, “FLAC3D: Fast lagrangian analysis of continua in 3-dimensions 5.01 manual,” Itasca, Minneapolis, 2013. [15] S. C. Chian et al., “Soil liquefaction–induced uplift of underground structures: physical and numerical modeling,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 140, no. 10, pp. 04014057, 2014. [16] Z. Wang et al., “A full coupled numerical analysis approach for buried structures subjected to subsurface blast,” Computers and Structures, vol 83, pp. 339–356, 2005. [17] F. Khoshnoudian, and I. Shahrour “Numerical Analysis of the Seismic Behavior of Tunnels Constructed in Liquefiable Soils,” Soils and Foundations, vol 42, no. 6, pp. 1-8, 2002. [18] J. Zhou et al., “Micro-and macro-observations of liquefaction of saturated sand around buried structures in centrifuge shaking table tests,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 72, pp. 1-11, May 2015. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 454 PDF Download: 691 |
||||
