Three ports versus conventional five ports laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for treatment of morbid obesity; a retrospective study. | ||||
| Zagazig University Medical Journal | ||||
| Article 40, Volume 30, Issue 1.1, January and February 2024, Page 305-312 PDF (874.3 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2021.69497.2182 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mohammed Algazar   1; Wael M. Abdalla2; Tamer Rushdy Elalfy3
| ||||
| 1general surgery department faculty of medicine zagazig university | ||||
| 2Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt | ||||
| 3Lecturer general surgery faculty of medicine zagazig university | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Aim: To assess and compare the feasibility and efficacy of three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (3P LSG) and conventional 5 ports laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (5P LSG). Patients and Methods: A prospective comparative randomized clinical trial to compare patients who underwent 3P LSG versus conventional 5P LSG, each group contain 120 patients. Results: The follow-up was 12 months for both groups. Mean operative time was longer in 3P LSG (65.5 ± 10.24 min) vs. (55.9± 5. 2 min) in 5P LSG, (P < 0.000). There were 2 cases of intraoperative bleeding in each group. One case of leak in each group. Wound infection at port site was observed in 1 and 2 trocar sites in 3P LSG and 5P LSG (P = 1.000), respectively. At mean 12 months follow-up, with no lost, excess weight loss percentage (%EWL) was 40.44 ±6.34 in 3P LSG and 41.62±5.74 in 5P LSG ( P= 0.127). Conclusion: Three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (3P LSG) is a feasible technique without affecting (%EWL) rates, with acceptable complication rate, but with longer operative time. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Morbid obesity; Sleeve gastrectomy; reduced port; laparoscopy; bariatric surgery | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 175 PDF Download: 28 |
||||
