Impact of Sodium Nitrite and Sodium Lactate as Chemical Preservatives on the Shelf Life of locally manufactured Frozen Beef Sausages as compared with Thyme and Cinnamon as Natural Preservatives

doi:10.21608/ejah.2021.199887

Impact of Sodium Nitrite and Sodium Lactate as Chemical Preservatives on the Shelf Life of locally manufactured Frozen Beef Sausages as compared with Thyme and Cinnamon as Natural Preservatives

Egyptian Journal of Animal Health

Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 4, October 2021, Page 1-12 PDF (1.06 MB)

Document Type: Original researches

DOI: 10.21608/ejah.2021.199887

View on SCiNiTO

Abstract

Sausages are common traditional food that served in every Egyptian house. Nine groups of beef sausages were prepared using either natural preservatives (cinnamon 1% and thyme 1%) or chemical preservatives (sodium lactate 1.5%, 3% and sodium nitrite 0.01%) and control samples (without the addition of any preservatives). Samples were stuffed into natural and artificial casing, then kept at freezing condition (-18 °C) until exceeding the permissible limits (became unacceptable). Sensory properties and microbial loads decreased gradually with freezing time in all groups, followed by gradual increase in aerobic plate count (APC) on day 14 for cinnamon, thyme, nitrite and control groups in natural casing (4.54, 4.56 4.47 and 4.45 log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively), while was on day 42 for lactate 1.5% and 3% groups (3.48and 3.41 log₁₀CFU/g, respectively). APC of all sausage samples exceeded the permissible limits on 97^th day of storage except for lactate 1.5% and 3% groups which were unfit on 104^th (14 days after the end of shelf life) and on 118^th day (28 days after the end of shelf life), respectively. The same manner was observed in total psychrotrophic count which decreased gradually with freezing time in all groups, followed by a gradual increase on day 14 for cinnamon, thyme, nitrite and control groups in natural casing (3.66, 3.72, 3.48 and 3.53 log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively), while was on day 42 for lactate 1.5% and 3% groups (2.85and 2.71log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively).
Chemical analysis revealed gradual increase in total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in all sausage samples until exceeded the permissible limits on the 97^th day of freezing, except samples treated with 1.5% and 3% SL. Acceptable values were clear for 3% SL even on 111^th day of freezing. Samples treated with 1.5% SL exceeded the permissible limits on day 104(21.07 mg/100g and 0.96 mg malonaldehyde/kg, respectively) which went on the same way with APC. Samples treated with cinnamon, thyme and nitrite had the best sensory scores among other groups at the beginning of storage, but declined quickly from the 14^th day of freezing. Samples packed in artificial (collagen) casing had lower bacterial load but less overall acceptability than those in natural sheep casing throughout the storage period. SL 3% improved the shelf life of frozen sausage. Thus, using sodium lactate works better as a food additive and preservative for beef sausages than other chemicals as nitrite and natural preservatives as cinnamon and thyme especially when stored under freezing condition (-18 °C) and packed in artificial casing.

Keywords

Sausages; cinnamon; thyme; nitrite; sodium lactate; freezing; microbial; chemical; sensory; casing; shelf life

Full Text

INTRODUCTION

The need to conserve meat soundness motivated the production of processed meat and meat products at first. As the oldest of these ways mainly include fermentation, drying, and salting (Bosse et al. 2018). Beef sausage is one of Egyptian popular meat products, made primarily from beef, fat, salt, and spices. Sausage is a highly perishable food since it is made from fresh meat (Shahin, 2016). Sausages are processed in oxygen quasi-permeable wrapping and held at refrigeration temperatures due to their high fat content, which encourages lipid oxidation (Hugo & Hugo, 2015). Spices and herbs have been applied for the prevention of food decay and pathogenic organisms due to their antimicrobial properties. Ground mustard, clove, and cinnamon, as well as their oils, are considered to help prevent food spoilage due to microbial growth (Al-Wabel, 2007). Smith-Palmer et al. (2001) found that 1% of cinnamon or thyme was the most powerful concentration when comparing the anti-microbial effect of cinnamon and thyme at various concentrations (0.1%, 0.5%, and 1%). Because of their beneficial effect on meat quality and microbiological protection. Nitrates are among the most essential additives in meat industry. Nitrite was often used to preserve meat products like sausages (Parthasarathy & Bryan, 2012), it has a potent bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties against a variety of spoilage bacteria and pathogenic microorganisms found in meat products (Sindelar & Milkowski, 2012). The antimicrobial effect of nitrites is most likely due to reactions involving the production of nitrous acid or nitric oxide (Møller & Skibsted, 2002). Nitrite has been reported to be more effective against Gram positive bacteria than Gram negative bacteria (Pichner et al. 2006). Permissible limits for residual nitrites in meat products have been developed around the world, ranging from 40 to 100 ppm depending on the meat products’ manufacturing condition (ES/3597, 2005; ES/3598, 2005). However, when consumed in large quantities with food, nitrite and indirectly nitrate can pose a health risk to humans. Some of these cases could be handled, while others were fatal. Death can result from a sodium nitrite (SN) intake of 33-250 mg per kg of body weight (Honikel, 2004). Concerns that the use of nitrite may result in the formation of carcinogenic nitrosamines when it reacts with secondary amines found in meat has prompted the search for alternatives (Houtsma, 1996).

Lactate at 1.5–3 g/100 g of meat weight is widely used in the meat industry to increase a variety of meat quality characteristics. Adding sodium lactate to ground beef and other meat products has been seen in several studies to enhance taste, color, tenderness, juiciness, and cooking yields (Vote et al. 2000). According to Koos (1992) lactates' antimicrobial properties are because of the tendency to reduce moisture content and the lactate ion's inhibitory impact. Adding 2-3% of the 60 percent solution to meat and poultry products is generally recommended (Houtsma, 1996). According to Sallam & Samejima (2004), sodium lactate, either by itself or in conjunction with sodium chloride, can be used to preserve chemical characters, minimize microbial growth, and extend the shelf life of ground beef in the refrigerator. This study aimed to compare between the implications of specific sodium nitrite and lactate concentrations as chemical preservatives with thyme and cinnamon as natural ones, on the consistency and shelf life of beef sausage in natural and artificial casing. This would be helpful in improving meat technology, specifically in terms of limiting the use of hazardous preservatives.

MATERIAL and METHODS

Fresh Egyptian sausage were prepared according to the quality criteria described by ES/1972 (2005). Sodium nitrite (SN) and sodium lactate (SL; C3H5NaO3: LOBA CHEMIE PVT. LTD Batch # L312122002)were obtained from El-Gomhouria Co., Egypt.

2.1.Sausage preparation:

In a bowl chopper, meat and fat were minced then mixed. Other spices and additives were applied before the starch was added. The paste obtained was divided into nine equal groups, each group weighed about 1000 g. G1 (control group) was stuffed in natural casing without adding any preservatives. G2 was treated withSL 1.5 g/100 g meat. G3 was treated with SL 3 g/100 g meat, which is the maximum limits as permitted by the USDA-Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) at a level of up to 3 g/100 g meat (Bedie et al. 2001). G4 and G5 were given 1% ground cinnamon and 1% ground thyme respectively, as recommended by Smith-Palmer et al. (2001). G6 was treated with SN at a concentration 0.01% (100 ppm), which is the maximum allowable amounts in meat products according to the FAO/WHO (1991) standard and the ES/3597 (2005). G1 to G6 groups were stuffed in natural casing. G7 (control group) was stuffed in artificial casing without adding any preservatives. G8 was treated with SL 1.5 g/100 g meat. G9 was treated with SL 3 g/100 g meat. Groups G7, G8 and G9 were stuffed in synthetic collagen casing.

Cinnamon and thyme were added to the sausage formulations as ingredients, while SL solutions and SN powder were added after mixing the sausage ingredients. The final mixture was transferred to a commercial sausage filling machine and stuffed into the natural and the permeable synthetic casing with 21 mm calibre. Beef sausages of each group was then packed separately in polyethylene bags, labelled and stored at -18 °C.

2.2. Sausage Examination:

The treated and the control groups were inspected for physical, chemical, and microbial deteriorative parameters during freezing storage until spoilage occurred and each experiment was repeated three times, as stated below:

2.2.1. Sensory evaluation

Sensory tests were performed on sausage samples right after they were made, then periodically every 14 days as defined byChabela & Mateo-Oyague (2005). After frying and slicing the samples, an experienced nine-member committee evaluated the efficacy and sensory attributes features of the sausages as described by Watts et al. (1989)and focused to compare between natural and artificial casing. After the panel members had carried out the sensory parameters, they recorded the color, taste, odor, juiciness, springiness, and overall acceptability, depending on a nine-point rating scale, with 9 being extremely good and 1 being incredibly bad ( Jin et al. 2016). On the days of the microbiological study, the sausages were visually inspected for spoilage.

2.2.2. Bacteriological examination

The sausage sample groups were microbiologically evaluated immediately after preparation, then every fourteen days as the sensory evaluation. Sausage in each group was cut into a sterile bag and mixed. The 25 g samples from these mixtures were mixed in a stomacher for 2 minutes in 225 mL of 0.1 % peptone water in an aseptic stomacher bag. Duplicate 1 mL inoculum of sufficient dilutions is plated into the following selected culture medium using serial decimal dilutions made of same diluent. Inoculated plate count agar was incubated for 72 hours at 30°C for the estimation of aerobic plate count (APC) according to ISO 4833-2 (2013). While the enumeration of psychrotrophic count was calculated out in accordance with APHA, (2001) in which plates were incubated for 10 days at 7°C.

2.2.3. Chemical analysis

Total volatile basic nitrogen value (TVB-N) was measured according to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 2000). Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) value was determined using the distillation method applied according to a technique described by AOAC, (2000).

2.2.4. Statistical analysis

The experiment was conducted in triplicate for microbiological and chemical examinations. After logarithmic transformation of the bacterial count, the data was analyzed statistically using SPSS software (IBM, co). ANOVA was employed to find significance (α = 0.05) at the same day. To determine whether there was a significant difference between groups, the least significant difference test (LSD) was utilized. Fisher's least significant difference test (LSD) was used to separate the means, and significance was determined at 0.05. The values obtained were then defined as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with p ≤ 0.05. Differences were considered to be statistically significant with values of P<0.05.

RESULTS

Sensory trait

Treatment

Freezing Time (Days)

Day 14

Day 28

Day 42

Day 56

Day 70

Day 84

Day 90

Day 97

Day 104

Day 118

Taste

7.8

6.5

6.7

7.3

6.1

5.9

6.6

5.9

5.3

6.1

5.4

5.1

5.7

4.8

4.5

5.2

4.4

4.0

4.8

3.9

3.5

4.2

3.3

2.9

3.7

2.6

2.3

2.8

2.2

1.8

2.2

1.7

1.4

8.5

8.3

7.3

7.8

7.3

6.8

6.2

5.8

5.5

5.4

4.9

4.5

4.6

4.4

4.1

4.2

4.1

3.8

3.3

3.5

3.4

2.7

2.4

2.6

2.2

2.0

2.1

1.9

1.6

1.7

1.5

1.3

1.2

Odor

7.2

7.1

6.7

6.5

6.8

6.1

5.9

6.0

5.4

5.3

5.6

5.4

5.1

5.3

5.0

4.8

4.9

4.6

4.4

4.1

4.2

3.4

3.6

3.5

2.8

3.2

3.0

2.4

2.6

1.8

1.9

2.0

8.2

7.7

7.0

7.6

7.4

6.6

6.3

5.8

5.9

5.7

5.1

5.0

5.2

4.7

4.3

4.5

4.1

4.0

3.5

3.2

3.3

2.9

2.5

2.7

2.4

1.9

2.3

2.0

1.6

1.7

1.5

1.2

Color

7.6

6.8

7.2

6.3

6.6

6.4

5.5

5.8

5.3

5.5

4.8

5.0

5.1

4.5

4.7

4.4

4.1

4.2

3.9

3.4

3.5

3.2

2.8

2.9

2.6

2.3

2.4

2.1

1.9

1.8

1.5

1.4

7.1

7.6

8.4

6.7

6.9

8.1

5.5

6.1

7.2

4.3

5.6

6.2

3.9

5.1

5.5

3.5

4.7

4.9

3.1

4.4

4.6

2.3

2.5

4.2

1.8

1.9

3.6

1.4

1.5

2.8

1.1

1.0

2.2

Flavor

7.3

6.7

6.4

6.9

6.5

6.3

6.0

5.7

5.9

5.4

5.1

4.8

5.0

4.6

4.3

4.2

4.1

3.8

3.4

3.5

3.2

2.8

2.7

2.9

2.5

2.2

2.4

2.0

1.7

1.9

1.4

1.2

1.3

8.6

8.3

7.2

7.5

7.2

6.7

6.5

6.1

5.8

4.9

4.5

5.1

4.2

3.8

4.7

3.7

3.5

4.2

3.3

2.9

3.6

2.6

2.3

3.0

2.1

1.8

2.6

1.7

1.5

2.2

1.2

1.1

1.7

Juiciness

6.8

6.4

6.3

6.1

6.0

5.6

5.2

5.5

5.0

4.8

4.7

4.4

4.2

4.0

3.8

3.5

3.3

3.2

2.8

2.6

2.7

2.4

2.0

2.4

1.9

1.5

1.9

1.4

1.1

1.4

0.9

0.6

7.3

6.9

6.5

6.8

6.4

6.1

5.7

5.5

5.1

5.4

4.5

4.8

4.7

3.9

4.1

3.6

3.3

3.7

3.4

2.9

3.0

2.6

2.4

2.6

2.3

2.0

2.1

1.8

1.6

1.5

1.1

0.9

0.8

Springiness

5.8

5.6

5.2

5.3

5.1

4.9

4.7

4.5

4.2

4.0

3.7

3.4

3.6

3.2

3.0

3.1

2.7

2.5

2.6

2.2

2.1

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.3

1.4

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.5

5.5

5.7

5.5

4.9

4.7

4.6

4.5

4.3

4.0

4.1

3.8

3.4

3.3

3.0

2.8

2.5

2.7

2.3

1.9

1.5

1.2

1.3

1.0

0.8

0.7

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.1

Overall acceptability

78.7 %

72.4 %

71.3 %

71.5 %

68.9 %

65.9 %

56.6%

61.3%

63.9%

51.6%

55.7%

57.1%

46.3%

50.4%

52.8%

40.8%

41.4%

44.3%

33.7%

35.8%

37.2%

29.4%

31.7%

35.1%

23.4%

25.8%

26.2%

19.9%

20.4%

21.7%

13.6%

14.2%

15.5%

83.7 %

82.4 %

77.6 %

76.5 %

73.9 %

72.0 %

59.2%

58.4%

60.0%

52.2%

52.6%

53.7%

47.9%

46.1%

47.2%

40.7%

41.5%

42.4%

35.2%

35.9%

35.2%

27.4%

25%

29.4%

25.1%

21.5%

23.7%

21.3%

17.8%

18.4%

16.3%

12.4%

13.9%

Table (1): Scores of sensory characters in sausage samples with natural casing during freezing storage.

Table (2):Scores of sensory characters in sausage samples with synthetic casing during freezing storage.

Sensory trait

Treatment

Freezing Time (Days)

Day 14

Day 28

Day 42

Day 56

Day 70

Day 84

Day 90

Day 97

Day 104

Day 118

Taste

6.3

6.0

6.1

5.8

5.6

5.3

5.5

5.1

5.0

4.9

4.7

4.5

4.2

4.1

3.8

3.4

3.0

3.3

3.1

2.6

2.7

2.5

2.1

2.4

2.1

1.7

2.1

1.6

1.4

1.6

1.2

1.0

Odor

6.9

6.6

6.5

6.4

6.0

6.1

5.8

5.6

5.7

5.2

5.3

5.1

4.7

4.5

4.6

4.5

4.1

4.3

4.0

3.8

3.9

3.5

3.4

3.5

3.1

2.9

3.0

2.7

2.5

2.6

2.3

2.2

Color

6.7

6.5

6.4

6.1

6.0

5.7

5.6

5.5

5.3

5.1

5.0

4.6

4.8

4.5

4.1

4.3

4.1

3.9

3.7

3.6

3.5

3.3

2.8

2.6

2.9

2.5

2.1

2.3

2.0

1.7

Flavor

6.4

6.1

6.2

6.0

5.8

5.6

5.4

5.3

5.1

4.9

4.7

4.5

4.6

4.3

4.1

4.0

3.7

3.8

3.5

3.3

3.1

2.9

2.7

2.8

2.6

2.2

2.4

2.3

1.6

1.9

1.6

1.2

1.5

Juiciness

6.3

6.1

6.3

5.8

5.6

5.4

5.3

5.4

5.1

4.9

4.8

4.5

4.4

4.3

4.0

4.1

3.7

3.6

3.4

3.2

3.0

2.8

2.9

2.6

2.4

2.2

2.1

1.7

1.6

1.7

1.3

1.2

Springiness

7.6

7.5

7.6

7.5

7.3

7.1

7.0

6.9

6.7

6.4

6.3

6.0

6.1

6.0

5.8

5.7

5.8

5.5

5.4

5.3

5.0

5.1

4.7

4.5

4.3

4.0

3.9

3.6

3.4

3.1

2.8

Overall acceptability

74.4%

71.8%

72.4%

70.4%

68.1%

65.7%

55.3%

60.3%

62.3%

52.8%

57.4%

59.3%

49.6%

50%

51.6%

39.4%

45.7%

46.2%

36.8%

42.9%

44.6%

32.3%

37.2%

39.4%

27.1%

32.7%

34.8%

21.6%

27.5%

30.9%

16.7%

22.2%

25.3%

Freezing time	Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5	Group 6	Group 7	Group 8	Group 9
Zero time	4.37±0.01	4.33^c ±0.01	4.27 ͣ^b±0.01	4.48±0.03	4.56±0.02	4.40±0.01	4.31^c ±0.01	4.29 ͣ ±0.01	4.25^b±0.01
Day 1	4.32±0.01	4.28±0.02	4.18±0.02	4.37±0.02	4.42±0.02	4.35±0.01	4.19±0.01	4.12 ͣ ±0.02	4.13 ͣ ±0.02
Day 14	4.45^a ±0.02	4.16±0.03	4.03±0.02	4.54±0.01	4.56±0.01	4.47 ^a ±0.02	4.33±0.01	4.02±0.00	3.88±0.02
Day 28	4.52±0.02	3.56±0.01	3.53±0.01	4.61 ͣ ±0.01	4.63 ͣ ±0.01	4.54±0.01	4.47±0.01	3.85±0.01	3.67±0.02
Day 42	4.73±0.01	3.48±0.01	3.41±0.00	4.89±0.01	4.92±0.01	4.70±0.02	4.62±0.02	3.97±0.01	3.55±0.01
Day 56	4.89±0.01	4.03±0.01	3.85±0.00	4.94±0.01	5.01±0.01	4.81±0.01	4.79±0.01	4.21±0.01	4.26±0.01
Day 70	5.45 ±0.01	4.14±0.01	4.10±0.00	5.18±0.01	5.25±0.01	5.16 ͣ ±0.01	5.15 ͣ ±0.01	4.40^b±0.01	4.39^b±0.01
Day 84	5.50 ±0.02	4.36 ±0.01	4.28 ±0.02	5.29 ±0.01	5.34 ±0.00	5.22 ±0.01	5.26 ±0.01	4.72 ±0.00	4.61 ±0.02
Day 90	5.66±0.01	4.85±0.02	4.33±0.02	5.37±0.01	5.40±0.01	5.31±0.02	5.33±0.01	5.08±0.01	5.03±0.02
Day 97	6.99±0.01	5.47±0.01	4.71±0.00	6.82±0.02	6.85±0.01	6.71±0.01	6.87±0.02	5.41±0.01	5.15±0.00
Day 104	U	6.93±0.01	5.18±0.02	U	U	U	U	6.58±0.01	5.29±0.01
Day 111	U	U	5.63±0.01	U	U	U	U	U	5.40±0.02
Day 118	U	U	6.30±0.01	U	U	U	U	U	6.24±0.01

Table (3): Aerobic plate count (log₁₀CFU/g) in sausage samples with natural and synthetic casing during freezing storage.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. There are significance differences at (P<0.05) between all the groups in all examination times except those means having the same alphabetical letters superscript along row.

U= means Unacceptable according to the ES/1972 (2005).

Table (4): Psychrotrophic count (log₁₀CFU/g) in sausage samples with natural and synthetic casing during freezing storage.

Freezing time	Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5	Group 6	Group 7	Group 8	Group 9
Zero time	3.11 ͣ ±0.01	3.05±0.01	3.02^b ±0.02	3.26±0.01	3.28±0.01	3.09±0.03	3.10 ͣ ±0.01	3.03±0.01	3.00^b ±0.02
Day 1	3.07±0.01	2.94±0.02	2.90±0.01	3.12 ͣ ±0.02	3.15 ͣ ±0.01	3.04±0.01	3.01±0.01	2.82±0.01	2.75±0.01
Day 14	3.53±0.03	2.80±0.01	2.76±0.02	3.66±0.02	3.72±0.01	3.48±0.01	3.39±0.03	2.63±0.03	2.60±0.03
Day 28	3.86±0.01	2.73±0.01	2.64 ͣ ±0.01	3.95±0.01	3.98±0.02	3.80±0.03	3.52±0.01	2.50 ͣ ±0.01	2.43±0.01
Day 42	4.61 ͣ ±0.02	2.85±0.01	2.71±0.01	4.77±0.01	4.88±0.03	4.52 ͣ ±0.02	4.44±0.01	2.61±0.01	2.56±0.02
Day 56	4.90±0.01	3.16 ±0.02	3.05 ͣ ±0.01	4.98±0.03	5.00±0.02	4.84±0.02	4.74±0.01	3.01 ͣ ±0.02	2.82±0.01
Day 70	5.37 ±0.02	3.91±0.01	3.58±0.02	5.40^a ±0.01	5.56±0.01	5.39 ͣ ±0.01	5.15±0.03	3.42±0.02	3.20±0.01
Day 84	5.47 ±0.02	4.18 ±0.00	4.10 ±0.01	5.51 ±0.02	5.72 ±0.01	5.42 ±0.00	5.65 ±0.01	4.03 ±0.02	4.39 ±0.00
Day 90	5.58±0.01	4.57±0.03	4.32±0.01	5.64±0.02	5.83±0.01	5.55±0.01	5.81±0.02	4.16±0.03	4.44±0.01
Day 97	6.81^a ±0.01	5.63±0.02	4.89±0.03	6.76±0.01	6.80^a ±0.01	6.71±0.02	6.73±0.01	5.39±0.01	4.93±0.02
Day 104	NP	6.67±0.01	5.25±0.02	NP	NP	NP	NP	6.51±0.01	5.14±0.01
Day 111	NP	NP	5.74±0.01	NP	NP	NP	NP	NP	5.67±0.02
Day 118	NP	NP	6.23±0.01	NP	NP	NP	NP	NP	6.18±0.01

NP = means “Not Performed” as their corresponding aerobic plate counts were unacceptable

Table (5): Total volatile nitrogen (mg /100g) in sausage samples with natural and artificial casing during freezing storage.

Freezing time	Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5	Group 6	Group 7	Group 8	Group 9
Zero time	9.13± 0.21	8.57± 0.25	8.90± 0.36	9.33±0.31	8.87± 0.21	9.07± 0.25	7.37±0.25	8.17±0.42	7.80±0.50
Day 14	11.53± 0.15	10.53±0.25	10.50±0.36	11.87±0.31	12.33±0.40	10.73±0.35	9.50±0.20	9.13±0.31	8.67±0.21
Day 28	12.83± 0.47	11.90±0.30	11.83±0.35	13.34±0.21	13.71±0.50	11.99±0.10	11.27±0.45	10.97±0.60	9.50±0.20
Day 42	14.17± 0.32	13.00±0.30	12.05±0.20	14.83± 0.30	14.17±0.35	12.60±0.30	12.68±0.10	12.50±0.20	11.67±0.15
Day 56	15.73± 0.25	14.83±0.25	13.53±0.15	15.26±0.20	15.84±0.25	13.74±0.10	14.09±0.45	13.93±0.25	12.50±0.46
Day 70	16.52± 0.40	15.12±0.35	14.90±0.15	16.73±0.61	16.29±0.10	15.83±0.45	14.83±0.35	14.07±0.35	13.11±0.30
Day 84	18.61± 0.15	16.74±0.40	15.87±0.31	17.55±0.31	17.37±0.31	16.04±0.20	16.12±0.25	15.80±0.15	14.73±0.45
Day 90	19.84± 0.30	17.67±0.10	16.83±0.31	18.37±0.45	19.47±0.35	18.73±0.25	18.23±0.40	16.29±0.40	15.22±0.35
Day 97	21.70± 0.20	18.39±0.20	17.16±0.15	24.43±0.31	25.17±0.35	23.90±0.36	25.23±0.55	17.17±0.60	16.57±0.25
Day 104	U	21.07±0.31	18.57±0.25	U	U	U	U	23.77±0.35	17.86±0.10
Day 111	U	U	19.67±0.15	U	U	U	U	U	18.24±0.15
Day 118	U	U	21.29±0.20	U	U	U	U	U	23.10±0.00

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. There are significance differences at (P<0.05) between all the groups in all examination times

U= Unacceptable according to theES/1972 (2005).

Table (6): Thiobarbituric acid (mg-malondialdehyde/kg) in sausage samples with natural and artificial casing during freezing storage.

Freezing time	Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5	Group 6	Group 7	Group 8	Group 9
Zero time	0.25± 0.02	0.25±0.03	0.21± 0.03	0.24±0.05	0.29±0.03	0.25± 0.05	0.28±0.03	0.23±0.03	0.26±0.03
Day 14	0.29± 0.01	0.27±0.02	0.25± 0.03	0.31±0.04	0.36±0.02	0.33± 0.03	0.37±0.03	0.29±0.04	0.30±0.04
Day 28	0.37± 0.02	0.30±0.01	0.29± 0.02	0.39±0.02	0.40±0.03	0.38± 0.01	0.41± 0.01	0.36±0.01	0.36±0.00
Day 42	0.41± 0.03	0.38±0.02	0.37± 0.03	0.43±0.01	0.46±0.04	0.44± 0.01	0.49± 0.04	0.43±0.03	0.39±0.00
Day 56	0.53± 0.03	0.42±0.03	0.40± 0.01	0.58±0.03	0.55±0.04	0.47± 0.02	0.55±0.03	0.47±0.01	0.41±0.02
Day 70	0.60± 0.02	0.51±0.03	0.49± 0.03	0.65±0.02	0.68±0.05	0.62± 0.02	0.68±0.03	0.51±0.05	0.44±0.01
Day 84	0.78± 0.03	0.59±0.02	0.53± 0.03	0.74± 0.02	0.76± 0.01	0.72± 0.00	0.70± 0.03	0.59±0.02	0.49±0.00
Day 90	0.85± 0.01	0.65±0.03	0.58± 0.01	0.80±0.06	0.86±0.02	0.88±0.03	0.81±0.05	0.63±0.03	0.55±0.02
Day 97	0.93± 0.02	0.74±0.03	0.63± 0.02	1.27±0.03	1.24±0.04	0.96± 0.03	1.03±0.05	0.74±0.02	0.65±0.04
Day 104	U	0.96±0.03	0.67± 0.05	U	U	U	U	0.91±0.01	0.75±0.02
Day 111	U	U	0.75± 0.04	U	U	U	U	U	0.83±0.02
Day 118	U	U	0.90±0.02	U	U	U	U	U	0.93±0.03

Values are expressed as mean ± SD. There are significance differences at (P<0.05) between all the groups in all examination times

U= Unacceptable according to the ES for frozen sausage (2005).

4. DISCUSSION

4.1. Effect of preservatives on sensory properties of sausage samples

Data in tables 1 and 2 showed that sensory traits of frozen meat sausages (taste, odor and color as well as flavor, juiciness and springiness) decreased gradually with storage time in all group samples. This could be due to freezing that causes massive ice crystals formation, leading to loss of nutrients, loss of juice and unfavorable appearance upon thawing (Marapana et al.2018). G4 and G5 had the highest sensory scores and overall acceptability among other groups at the first 14 days of storage as shown in table 1. This is due to the familiar flavor of cinnamon and thyme to the Egyptian consumers who used to add these herbs during sausage preparation. This agreed with Batiha et al. (2021); Mendonca et al. (2018); and Shan et al. (2009) who mentioned that those herbs had an immediate effect on sensory parameters when applied to food. On the other hand, Jin et al. (2016) concluded that adding thyme to sausages at the start of storage does not enhance sensory evaluation, but it could promote anti-oxidative and antimicrobial activity because thyme is good natural sources of dietary bioactive components.

G6 had the best color scores during the first 14 days of freezing as the bright red color of sausage is one of characteristic effects of nitrite on meat product which agreed with Wójciak et al. (2019). Taste ratings were poorer in case of synthetic casing (G7, G8 and G9) than natural ones as illustrated in table 2. This could be referred to the fact that sausages stuffed in artificial casing are unfamiliar to Egyptian customers (edible but not preferable) due to its high elasticity and since they are not common in butchers and beef retails markets. These findings disagree with Marapana et al. (2018) who found that the flavor scores were high in Devro-Collagen and cellulose casing as it allows water to pass through during cooking giving the good flavor and taste of sausages. However, collagen casing maintained uniform shape and length of sausage samples throughout the freezing storage giving good overall acceptability. Flavor scores of G2, G3, G8 and G9 were lower than all other groups from day zero to day 14. This disagreed with Houtsma (1996) who reported that SL enhances the meat flavor. However, G2 and G3 had higher sensory scores than other groups near the end of the storage time, meaning that SL had the ability to delay the deterioration in sensory characters of beef sausages during freezing. Even more, SL had not change the taste or odor of sausages even when examined directly after preparation and on the 90^th day of storage.

On 90^th day of freezing storage at - 18°C, no signs of spoilage appeared on beef sausage even the control groups which could be attributed to freezing process that delay spoilage process. But all sausage groups had very bad sensory evaluations and became not accepted by all committee members on day 97 of storage except G2 and G8 became unacceptable on the 104^th day of storage while G3 and G9 on the day 118^th.These findings go in the same way with Massart et al. (1986) who found that sodium lactate inhibit the formation of off-flavors in fresh beef due to its indirect inhibition of autoxidation. Moreover, in the present research yellowish discolorations of the external surface of beef sausage samples in G3 were noticed on the 84^th day. However, the current study disagreed with Brewer et al. (1991) who reported that SL up to 3% does not affect the color of the meat products otherwise, it tended to maintain reddish color, and to enhance tastes in sausage. Besides, the yellowish discolorations in the current study disagreed with Papadopoulos et al. (1991) who reported that the increase in SL levels from 0-4% in cooked beef roasts resulted in a darker red color with less gray surface of this meat product. Juiciness of all sausage samples reduced throughout freezing storage, due to the surface dehydration FAO (1986). So far, there are no reliable studies on the side effects or cumulative impact of using sodium lactate as a chemical preservative in food.

4.2. Effect of chemical and natural preservatives on microbiological properties of sausage samples

Data in table 3 showed that microbial loads of aerobic plate count (APC) decreased gradually with freezing time in all groups, followed a gradual increase in APC on day 14 for G1, G4, G5, G6 and G7 (4.45, 4.54, 4.56, 4.47 and 4.33 log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively), while was on day 42 for G2, G3, G8 and G9 (3.48, 3.41, 3.97 and 3.55log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively). Table 4 showed that total psychrotrophic count declined steadily with freezing time in all groups in the same way followed by a progressive rise in psychrotrophic count on day 14 for G1, G4, G5, G6 and G7 (3.53, 3.66, 3.72, 3.48 and 3.39 log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively), while was on day 42 for G2, G3, G8 and G9 (2.85, 2.71, 2.61 and 2.56log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively), meaning that adding SL would delay the rise of microbial load during freezing up to 28 days than other groups with natural casing without treatment. On 90 days of storage in the freezer, the APC of all groups remained within the permissible limits according to the ES/1972 (2005) (less than 10⁶) but G3 had the lowest TAC (4.33 log₁₀CFU/g) and psychrotrophic count (4.32 log₁₀CFU/g). However, G2 and G8 exceeded the permissible limits at 104^th day (6.93 and 6.58 log₁₀ CFU/g respectively) of storage (14 days after the end of shelf life), while was on 118^th day (28 days after the end of shelf life) for G3 and G9 (6.30 and 6.24 log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively). These results supported those of Maca et al. (1997) who found that SL (3%) reduced the mesophilic bacteria count and enhanced the cooked roast beef color for beef rounds. In addition, Lamkey et al. (1991) concluded that the shelf life of sausage was extended by more than two weeks when 3% sodium lactate was added. Moreover, these results were consistent with those of Marapana et al. (2018) who investigated the impact of freezing conditions on quality of sausages and reported that APC decreased within 3 weeks of freezing and started to increase after 7^th week and remain within the accepted level even after 3 months period (Mean value of the slow frozen samples 3.37 x10⁴cfu/g). Furthermore,Shelef (1994) found that lactic acid reduced the APC. Our findings disagreed with Álvarez-Astorga et al. (2002) who recorded high microbial loads in sausages in Spain markets which had total bacterial counts of mesophiles and psychrotrophs from 7.14 to 7.28 and 7.72 to 7.87 log CFU/g, respectively and about 80% of those sausages were deemed unsuitable for consumption. G6 showed lower TAC than G4 and G5 throughout the freezing storage and even on the 90^th day (G6=5.55, G4= 5.64andG5=5.83 log₁₀ CFU/g). This agreed with Houtsma (1996) who assumed that the microbial safety of meat products is improved by the addition of nitrite. In addition, Smith-Palmer et al. (2001) mentioned that 1% thyme or cinnamon had a strong antimicrobial effect.

APC of G9 on 90^th day of storage was lower than that of G7 and G8 (5.03,5.33and5.08 log₁₀CFU/g, respectively), but higher than that of G3 (4.33 log₁₀CFU/g) as illustrated in table 3. These observations could be clarified according to Marapana et al. (2018) who mentioned that temperature fluctuations and frequent freezing/thawing of sausage samples during storage may act as stress factors that are harmful to microorganisms.

4.3. Effect of preservatives on chemical properties of sausage samples

The permissible limits of TVB-N and TBA are 20 mg/100g and 0.9 mg malonaldehyde/kg respectively according to the ES/1972 (2005). TVB-N and TBA values of G2 became unacceptable on day 104 (21.07 mg/100g and 0.96 mg malonaldehyde/kg respectively) as shown in tables 5 and 6 and the same for G8 (23.77 mg/100g and 0.91 mg malonaldehyde/kg respectively). While those of G3 and G9 become unacceptable on 118^th day of storage. These results agreed with Choi & Chin (2003) who reported that sausage containing 3.3% SL itself had lower (P<0.05) thiobarbituric acid amounts than the control. In addition, Abd El-Salam (1978) added that the TVB-N content of frozen meat increased during storage, minimizing the shelf life of sausage made from frozen meat. However, Brewer et al. (1991) mentioned that TBA was unaffected by SL level.

The results of the current research indicated that natural preservatives as cinnamon and thyme didn’t differ significantly than the control sausage samples throughout the storage time. The current study backed up Sallam & Samejima (2004) findings, which show that sodium lactate alone can be used to preserve chemical properties, minimize microbial growth, and extend the shelf life.

CONCLUSION

From the current study it is clear that using sodium lactate at 3% as a preservative extends the shelf life of beef sausages better than other chemicals such as nitrite and natural preservatives such as cinnamon and thyme even for 3 weeks after its original shelf life when stored at -18 °C which could be positively reflected on the customer health. The addition of sodium lactate 3% did not change the natural flavor of sausages and those packed in synthetic casing had reasonable microbial quality and chemical values but lower sensory attributes. Thus, it is recommended using sodium lactate 3% as a reliable preservative in the sausage industry. While the addition of cinnamon or thyme improved the sensory traits of sausage for a couple of weeks after freezing and it had antibacterial effect. Eventually, freezing sausage might be a reliable option to hold its microbial quality for up to ninety days allowing a better health significance.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Dr. Hanan A. Fahmy; Deputy Director for Research and Environmental Health, Prof. Dr. Mohamed El-Mossallamy, Prof. Dr. Khalid Tolba, Prof. Dr. Jehan Mahmoud Ouf, Prof. Dr. Khaled M. El-Khawas and Prof. Dr. Bassma Ahmed Hendy from Reference Lab for Safety Analysis of Food of Animal Origin, Animal Health Research Institute, Giza, who gave valuable advice and guidance that greatly helped in the current study.

Funding

This article did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Authors Contributions

The two authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Abd El-Salam, M. A. (1978). Chemical and technological studies on some Egyptian meat. Mvsc., Thesis, Fac. Agri., El- Azhar Univ.

Al-Wabel, N. A. (2007). ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES OF SPICES. Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut, 30(1), 81–87.

Álvarez-Astorga, M., Capita, R., Alonso-Calleja, C., Moreno, B., del, M., and Garcı́a-Fernández, C. (2002). Microbiological quality of retail chicken by-products in Spain. Meat Science, 62(1), 45–50.

APHA (American public health association) (2001). APHA committee on microbiological methods for foods.Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of food. 4. Ed. Was, 676.

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) (2000). Official methods of analysis. Association of official analytical chemists. 16th ed. Washington, DC, USA.

Batiha, G., Hussein, D. E., Algammal, A. M., George, T. T., Jeandet, P., Al-Snafi, A. E., Tiwari, A., Pagnossa, J. P., Lima, C. M., Thorat, N. D., Zahoor, M., El-Esawi, M., Dey, A., Alghamdi, S., Hetta, H. F., and Cruz-Martins, N. (2021). Application of natural antimicrobials in food preservation: Recent views. Food Control, 126, 108066.

Bedie, G. K., Samelis, J., Sofos, J. N., Belk, K. E., Scanga, J. A., and Smith, G. C. (2001). Antimicrobials in the formulation to control Listeria monocytogenes postprocessing contamination on frankfurters stored at 4 degrees C in vacuum packages. Journal of Food Protection, 64(12), 1949–1955.

Bosse (née Danz), R., Müller, A., Gibis, M., Weiss, A., Schmidt, H., and Weiss, J. (2018). Recent advances in cured raw ham manufacture. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58(4), 610–630.

BREWER, M. S., MCKEITH, F., MARTIN, S. E., DALLMIER, A. W., and MEYER, J. (1991). Sodium Lactate Effects on Shelf-Life, Sensory, and Physical Characteristics of Fresh Pork Sausage. Journal of Food Science, 56(5), 1176–1178.

Chabela, M., and Mateo-Oyague, J. (2005). Frozen Meat:Quality and Shelf Life.

Choi, S. H., and Chin, K. B. (2003). Evaluation of sodium lactate as a replacement for conventional chemical preservatives in comminuted sausages inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes. Meat Science, 65(1), 531–537.

ES/1972 (2005). Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality Control, Ministry of Industry. Cairo, Arab Republic of Egypt.

ES/3597. (2005). Egyptian Standard Specification. Egyptian Standard Specification for Sodium Nitrite Used in Food Products. Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality Control.

ES/3598. (2005). Egyptian Standard Specification. Egyptian Standard Specification for Sodium Nitrate Used in Food Products. Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality Control.

FAO/WHO. (1991). Joint FAO/ WHO standards programme. Codex Alimentarius Ccommission. 19th Session, Rome.

FAO. (1986). Manuals of food quality control. (P.G. Martin, ed). Food and Agriculture Organization. 8. Food Analysis. Food and Nutrition. Rome., 248, 14/5.

Honikel, K. O. (2004). CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR SPECIFIC COMPONENTS | Curing Agents. In Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences, 195–201.

Houtsma, P. C. (1996). The antimicrobial activity of sodium lactate [Houtsma]. https://edepot.wur.nl/200260

Hugo, C. J., and Hugo, A. (2015). Current trends in natural preservatives for fresh sausage products. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 45(1), 12–23.

ISO 4833-2. (2013). Microbiology of the food chain Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms Part 1: Colony count at 30 °C by the surface plating technique. Geneva, Switzerland.

Jin, S. K., Choi, J. S., Lee, S. J., Lee, S. Y., and Hur, S. J. (2016). Effect of Thyme and Rosemary on The Quality Characteristics, Shelf-life, and Residual Nitrite Content of Sausages During Cold Storage. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 36(5), 656–664.

Koos, I. J. T. de. (1992). Lactic acid and lactates. Preservation of food products with natural ingredients. J. Food Market. Technol., 6, 5–11.

LAMKEY, J. W., LEAK, F. W., TULEY, W. B., JOHNSON, D. D., and WEST, R. L. (1991). Assessment of Sodium Lactate Addition to Fresh Pork Sausage. Journal of Food Science, 56(1), 220–223.

Maca, J. V, Miller, R. K., Maca, J. D., and Acuff, G. R. (1997). Microbiological, sensory and chemical characteristics of vacuum-packaged cooked beef top rounds treated with sodium lactate and sodium propionate. Journal of Food Science, 62(3), 586–590.

Marapana, R., Nayanarasi, H., Senanayaka, S., Perera, P., and Kodagoda, K. (2018). Effect of processing conditions on quality of chicken sausages stuffed in different casings.

Massart, D.L., H. Deelstra, P. D. and C. van P. (1986). Vreemde stoffen in onze voeding. Soorten-effecten-normen. Pelckmans, Kapellen, 2nd edn, 320.

Mendonca, A., Jackson-Davis, A., Moutiq, R., and Thomas-Popo, E. (2018). Chapter 14 - Use of Natural Antimicrobials of Plant Origin to Improve the Microbiological Safety of Foods (S. C. Ricke, G. G. Atungulu, C. E. Rainwater, and S. H. B. T.-F. and F. S. S. and A. Park (eds.); 249–272. Academic Press.

Møller, J. K. S., and Skibsted, L. H. (2002). Nitric oxide and myoglobins. Chemical Reviews, 102(4), 1167–1178.

PAPADOPOULOS, L. S., MILLER, R. K., RINGER, L. J., and CROSS, H. R. (1991). Sodium Lactate Effect on Sensory Characteristics, Cooked Meat Color and Chemical Composition. Journal of Food Science, 56(3), 621–626.

Parthasarathy, D. K., and Bryan, N. S. (2012). Sodium nitrite: The “cure” for nitric oxide insufficiency. Meat Science, 92(3), 274–279.

Pichner R, Hechelmann H, Steinrück H, G. M. (2006). Shigatoxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in conventionally and organically produced salami products. Fleischwirtschaft, 10, 112-114.

Sallam, K. I., and Samejima, K. (2004). Microbiological and chemical quality of ground beef treated with sodium lactate and sodium chloride during refrigerated storage. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft + [i.e. Und] Technologie. Food Science + Technology. Science + Technologie Alimentaire, 37(8), 865–871.

Shahin, M. F. S. A. (2016). Production of Ready to Eat Sausage by New Method. Middle East J. Appl. Sci., 6(3), 474–478.

Shan, B., Cai, Y.-Z., Brooks, J. D., and Corke, H. (2009). Antibacterial and antioxidant effects of five spice and herb extracts as natural preservatives of raw pork. Journal of the Science ofFood and Agriculture, 89(11), 1879–1885.

Shelef, L. A. (1994). Antimicrobial Effects of Lactates: A Review. Journal of Food Protection, 57(5), 445–450.

Sindelar, J. J., and Milkowski, A. L. (2012). Human safety controversies surrounding nitrate and nitrite in the diet. Nitric Oxide : Biology and Chemistry, 26(4), 259–266.

Smith-Palmer, A., Stewart, J., and Fyfe, L. (2001). The potential application of plant essential oils as natural food preservatives in soft cheese. Food Microbiology, 18(4), 463–470.

Vote, D. J., Platter, W. J., Tatum, J. D., Schmidt, G. R., Belk, K. E., Smith, G. C., and Speer, N. C. (2000). Injection of beef strip loins with solutions containing sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium lactate, and sodium chloride to enhance palatability. Journal of Animal Science, 78(4), 952–957.

Watts, B.M.; Yamaki, G.L.; Jeffery, L.E. and Elias, L. G. (1989). Basic sensory methods for food evaluation / B.M. Watts ... [et al.] ; prepared with the support of the International Development Research Centre (B. M. Watts and I. D. R. C. (Canada) (eds.); First). The Centre.

Wójciak, K. M., Stasiak, D. M., and Kęska, P. (2019). The Influence of Different Levels of Sodium Nitrite on the Safety, Oxidative Stability, and Color of Minced Roasted Beef. In Sustainability11(14).

Statistics

Article View: 482

PDF Download: 215